Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T05:04:09.859Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Theory Generalization, Problem Reduction and the Unity of Science

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2022

Thomas Nickles
Thomas Nickles*
Affiliation:
University of Illinois at Champaign-Urbana
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Although doubtlessly aimed at later developments in physics, Einstein's famous remark, if interpreted so as to include classical statistical mechanics, nicely captures the spirit of work on the early quantum theory by men like Bohr and Ehrenfest, who, despite their conviction that the classical theories failed, nevertheless mined their riches to the fullest in the development of the new theory. In this paper I try to exhibit and characterize the patterns of reasoning involved in Ehrenfest's attempts to generalize Planck's early theory of the linear harmonic oscillator, and I then employ the same historical case as a basis for arguing that the reduction of problems to problems is an important phenomenon which cannot be fully understood in terms of the reduction of theories.

Type
Symposium: The Unity of Science
Information
PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association , Volume 1974 , 1974 , pp. 33 - 75
Copyright
Copyright © 1976 by D. Reidel Publishing Company, Dordrecht-Holland

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

An abbreviated version of this paper was presented at the 1974 meetings of the Philosophy of Science Association as part of a symposium (with Robert L. Causey and Lawrence Sklar) on the Unity of Science. I am grateful to Professor Dudley Shapere and to John Chapman for helpful advice and to the writings of Martin Klein on the history of the early quantum theory. None of these persons are responsible for errors or inadequacies which remain. I am indebted to the National Science Foundation for research support.

References

[1]Bohr, N.: 1913, ‘On the Constitution of Atoms and Molecules’, Part I, reprinted in ter Haar, D. (ed.), The Old Quantum Theory, Pergamon Press, Oxford, 1967, pp. 132–159.Google Scholar
[2]Bohr, N.: 1918, ‘On the Quantum Theory of Line-Spectra’, Part I, reprinted in (36), pp. 95–137.Google Scholar
[3]Burgers, J. M.: 1917, ‘Die adiabatischen Invarianten bedingt periodischer Systeme’, Annalen der Physik 52, 195–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[4]Debye, P.: 1914, ‘Zustandgleichung und Quantenhypothese mit einem Anhang über Wärmeleitung’, in Vorträge über die Kinetische Theorie der Materie und der Elektrizität, Teubner, Leipzig, pp. 19–60.Google Scholar
[5]Ehrenfest, P.: 1905, ‘Uber die physikalischen Voraussetzungen der Planck'schen Theorie der irreversiblen Strahlungsvorgange’, reprinted in (16), pp. 88–101.Google Scholar
[6]Ehrenfest, P.: 1911, ‘Welche Ziige der Lichtquantenhypothese spielen in der Theorie der Warmestrahlung eine wesentliche Rolle?’ Reprinted in (16), pp. 185–212.Google Scholar
[7]Ehrenfest, P.: 1913, ‘A Mechanical Theorem of Boltzmann and its Relation to the Theory of Quanta’, reprinted in (16), pp. 340–346.Google Scholar
[8]Ehrenfest, P.: 1914, ‘Zum Boltzmannschen Entropie-Wahrscheinlichkeits-Theorem’, reprinted in (16), pp. 347–352.Google Scholar
[9]Ehrenfest, P.: 1916, ‘On Adiabatic Changes of a System in Connection with the Quantum Theory’, reprinted in (16), pp. 378–399. An abbreviated version, reprinted in (36), appeared in 1917 with the title, ‘Adiabatic Invariants and the Theory of Quanta’.Google Scholar
[10]Ehrenfest, P.: 1923, ‘Adiabatische Transformationen in der Quantentheorie und ihre Behandlung durch Niels Bohr’, reprinted in (16), pp. 463–470.Google Scholar
[11]Einstein, A.: 1905, ‘On a Heuristic Viewpoint About the Creation and Conversion of Light’, reprinted in ter Haar, D. (ed.), The Old Quantum Theory, Pergamon Press, Oxford, 1967, pp. 91–107.Google Scholar
[12]Einstein, A.: 1936, ‘Physics and Reality’, reprinted in Ideas and Opinions, Crown Publishers, New York, 1954.Google Scholar
[13]Heilbron, J. L. and Kuhn, T. S.: 1969, ‘The Genesis of the Bohr Atom’, Historical Studies in the Physical Sciences, Vol. I, pp. 211–290.Google Scholar
[14]Jammer, M.: 1966, The Conceptual Development of Quantum Mechanics, McGraw-Hill, New York.Google Scholar
[15]Jeans, J. H.: 1905, ‘A Comparison between Two Theories of Radiation’, Nature 72, 293–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[16]Klein, M. J. (ed.): 1959, Paul Ehrenfest: Collected Scientific Papers, North Holland Publ. Co., Amsterdam.Google Scholar
[17]Klein, M. J.: 1962, ‘Max Planck and the Beginnings of the Quantum Theory’, Archive for History of Exact Sciences 1, 459–479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[18]Klein, M. J.: 1964, ‘The Origins of Ehrenfest's Adiabatic Principle’, in Guerlac, H. (ed.), Proceedings of the Tenth International Congress on the History of Science, Hermann, Paris, pp. 801–804.Google Scholar
[19]Klein, M. J.: 1967, ‘Thermodynamics in Einstein's Thought’, Science 157, 509–516.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[20]Klein, M. J.: 1970, ‘Maxwell, His Demon, and the Second Law of Thermodynamics’, American Scientist 58, 84–97.Google Scholar
[21]Klein, M. J.: 1970, Paul Ehrenfest, Vol. I: The Making of a Theoretical Physicist, North-Holland Publ. Co., Amsterdam.Google Scholar
[22]Nickles, T.: 1973, ‘Two Concepts of Intertheoretic Reduction’, Journal of Philosophy 70, 181–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[23]Nickles, T.: 1974, ‘Heuristics and Justification in Scientific Research: Comments on Shapere’, in Suppe, F. (ed.), The Structure of Scientific Theories, Univ. of Illinois Press, Urbana, pp. 571–589.Google Scholar
[24]Planck, M.: 1906, Vorlesungen uber die Theorie der Warmestrahlung, Johann Barth Verlag, Leipzig. The second edition, 1913, appeared in English translation.Google Scholar
[25]Planck, M.: 1912, ‘Rapport sur la Loi du Rayonnement Noir et L'Hypothese des Quantites Élémentaires D'Action’, in Langevin, P. and De Broglie, M. (eds.), La Théorie du Rayonnement et les Quanta, Gauthier-Villars, Paris. (Proceedings of the First Solvay Congress, 1911.)Google Scholar
[26]Post, H. R.: 1971, ‘Correspondence, Invariance, and Heuristics’, Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science 2, 213–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[27]Putnam, H.: 1965, ‘How Not to Talk about Meaning’, in Cohen, R. S. and Wartofsky, M. (eds.), Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, Vol. II, Reidel, D., Dordrecht, pp. 205–222.Google Scholar
[28](Lord), Rayleigh: 1902, ‘On the Pressure of Vibrations’, Philosophical Magazine 3, 338–346.Google Scholar
[29]Richtmyer, F. K., Kennard, E. H., and Lauritsen, T.: 1955, Introduction to Modern Physics, 5th ed., McGraw-Hill, New York.Google Scholar
[30]Rosenfeld, L.: 1936, ‘La Première Phase de L'Évolution de la Théorie des Quanta’, Osiris 2, 149–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[31]Shapere, D.: 1964, ‘The Structure of Scientific Revolutions’, Philosophical Review 73, 383–394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[32]Shapere, D.: 1966, ‘Meaning and Scientific Change’, in Colodny, R. G. (ed.), Mind and Cosmos, Univ. of Pittsburgh Press, Pittsburgh, pp. 41–85.Google Scholar
[33]Shapere, D.: 1971, ‘The Paradigm Concept’, Science 172, 706–709.10.1126/science.172.3984.706CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[34]Tisza, L.: 1963, ‘The Conceptual Structure of Physics’, Reviews of Modern Physics 35, 151–185.Google Scholar
[35]Tomonaga, S.: 1962, Quantum Mechanics, Vol. I, North-Holland Publ. Co., Amsterdam.Google Scholar
[36]van der Waerden, B. L. (ed.): 1968, Sources of Quantum Mechanics, Dover Publications, New York.Google Scholar
[37]Whittaker, E. T.: 1960, A History of Theories of Aether and Electricity, Vol. II, Harper & Brothers, New York.Google Scholar
[38]Yourgrau, W. and Mandelstam, S.: 1968, Variational Principles in Dynamics and Quantum Theory, Saunders, W. B., Philadelphia.Google Scholar