Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T19:14:52.087Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Taking Analogical Inference Seriously: Darwin's Argument From Artificial Selection

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 January 2023

C. Kenneth Waters
C. Kenneth Waters*
Affiliation:
John Carroll University
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

“The question for us,” as Ronald Giere writes in Understanding Scientific Reasoning, “is whether analogies play any role in the JUSTIFICATION of [a] new theory.” Giere’s answer is an emphatic “No.” (Giere 1984, pp. 79-80). Although most philosophers of science would probably qualify Giere’s unmitigated rejection of analogical justification, few attribute much significance to analogical arguments in science. And when philosophers do grudgingly acknowledge an analogical argument, they are hesitant to analyze it.

Take, for example, Charles Darwin’s argument for natural selection. It is difficult to deny that the analogy between artificial and natural selection played an important justificatory role. After all, artificial selectibn was the topic of the first chapter of Darwin’s Origin of Species and was referred to in countless arguments throughout the text.2

Type
Part VIII. Biology
Information
PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association , Volume 1986 , Issue 1: Volume One: Contributed Papers 1986 , 1986 , pp. 502 - 513
Copyright
Copyright © Philosophy of Science Association 1986

Footnotes

1

I thank Fred Churchill and Michael Ruse for helpful comments on an early ancestor of this paper.

References

Darwin, Charles. (1842). “Sketch of 1842.” (As printed in The Foundations of the Origin of Species: Two Essays Written in 1842 and 1 844. (ed.) F. Darwin. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1909. Pages 1–53.)Google Scholar
Darwin, Charles. (1859). On the Origin of Species. London: John Murray. (Facsimile of the first edition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1964.)Google Scholar
Evans, L.T. (1984). “Darwin’s Use of the Analogy between Artificial and Natural Selection.” Journal of the History of Biology 17: 113–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ghiselin, M.T. (1969). The Triumph of the Darwinian Method. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Giere, R.N. (1984). Understanding Scientific Reasoning. 2nd ed. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
Herbert, Sandra. (1971). “Darwin, Malthus, and Selection.” Journal of the History of Biology 4: 209–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hesse, Mary. (1966). Models and Analogies in Science. Notre Dame, IN: Notre Dame University Press.Google Scholar
Kitcher, Philip. (1985). “Darwin’s Achievement.” In Reason and Rationality in Natural Science. Edited by Nicholas Rescher. Lantham, MD: University Press of America, Inc. Pages 127-190.Google Scholar
Kohn, David. (1980). “Theories to Work By: Rejected theories, Reproduction, and Darwin’s Path to Natural Selection.” Studies in the History of Biology 4: 67–170.Google Scholar
Limoges, Camille. (1970). La Selection Naturelle: Etude sur la Premiere Constitution d’un Concept (1837-1859). Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
Lloyd, Elisabeth. (1983). “The Nature of Darwin’s Support for the Theory of Natural Selection.” Philosophy of Science 50: 112–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ospovat, Dov. (1981). The Development of Darwin’s Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ruse, Michael (1975a). “Darwin’s Debt to Philosophy: An Examination of the Influence of the Philosophical Ideas of John F.W. Herschel and William Whewell on the Development of Charles Darwin’s Theory of Evolution.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 6: 159–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ruse, Michael (1975b). “Charles Darwin and Artificial Selection.” Journal of the History of Ideas 36: 339–350. 1975b).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ruse, Michael. (1975c). “Charles Darwin’s Theory of Evolution: An Analysis.” Journal of the History of Biology 8: 219-211.Google Scholar
Ruse, Michael. (1979). The Darwinian Revolution. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Schweber, Silvian S (1977). “The Origin of the Origin Revisited.” Journal of the History of Biology 10: 229–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vorzimmer, Peter (1969a). “Darwin, Mai thus, and the Theory of Natural Selection.” Journal of the History of Ideas 30: 527–542.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vorzimmer, Peter (1969b). “Darwin’s Questions about the Breeding of Animals.” Journal of the History of Biology 2: 269–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weitzenfeld, Julian S. (1984). “Valid Reasoning by Analogy.” Philosophy of Science 51: 137–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Young, Robert M. (1971). “Darwin’s Metaphor: Does Nature Select?” The Monist 5: 442–503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar