Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T07:15:41.804Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Sociology and Hacking’s Trousers

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2022

Warren Schmaus
Warren Schmaus*
Affiliation:
Illinois Institute of Technology
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

For Hacking, the word “real” is one of J.L. Austin's trouser-words, taking its meaning from its negative uses in much the same way as the admittedly sexist expression “wear the trousers”. In Representing and Intervening, Hacking proposes that at least some scientific realists can be interpreted as using the word “real” in this way. The word “real” is also substantive-hungry, he adds. Thus when a philosopher states that a type of entity is not real we need to know just what is being denied. The causal entity realist, for example, holds that the entities scientists postulate in their theories can be regarded as real if they have causal powers that can be manipulated to create observable and repeatable effects. Thus the causalist offers sociology a possible way to command respect: if social science entities could be manipulated, the social sciences would then be on a par with physics.

Type
Part V. Problems in Special Sciences
Information
PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association , Volume 1992 , Issue 1: Volume One: Contributed Papers 1992 , 1992 , pp. 167 - 173
Copyright
Copyright © 1992 by the Philosophy of Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

1

I would like to thank Ian Hacking for his comments on an earlier draft of this essay and for sending me offprints of some of his articles. Of course, I accept full responsibility for any remaining errors of interpretation.

References

Bloor, D. (1982), “Durkheim and Mauss Revisited: Classification and the Sociology of Knowledge”, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 13: 267-97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bogen, J. (1988), “Comments on ‘The Sociology of Knowledge About Child Abuse,“’ Nous 22: 65-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Durkheim, E. (1912), Les Formes elementaires de la vie religieuse. Paris, France: Presses Universitaire de France, 1960.Google Scholar
Hacking, I. (1982), “Language, Truth and Reason”, in Rationality and Relativism, Hollis, M. and Lukes, S. (eds.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 48-66.Google Scholar
Hacking, I. (1983a), Representing and Intervening: Introductory Topics in the Philosophy of Natural Science. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hacking, I. (1983b), “The Accumulation of Styles of Scientific Reasoning”, in Kant oder Hegel, D. Henrich (ed.). Stuttgart, Germany: Klett-Cotta, pp.453-65.Google Scholar
Hacking, I. (1984), “Five Parables”, in Philosophy in History: Essays on the Historiography of Philosophy, Rorty, R. et al. (eds.). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, pp. 103-124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hacking, I. (1985), “Styles of Scientific Reasoning”, in Post-Analytic Philosophy, Rajchman, J. and West, C. (eds.). New York, NY: Columbia University Press, pp. 145-165.Google Scholar
Hacking, I. (1986a), “The Invention of Split Personalities”, in Human Nature and Natural Knowledge: Essays presented to Marjorie Grene on the Occasion of Her Seventy-Fifth Birthday, Donagan, A. et al. (eds.). Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, volume 89. Dordrecht: Reidel, pp. 63-85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hacking, I. (1986b), “Making Up People”, in Reconstructing Individualism, Heller, T. et al. (eds.). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, pp. 222-36.Google Scholar
Hacking, I. (1988), “The Sociology of Knowledge About Child Abuse”, Nous 22:53-63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hacking, I. (1989), “Extragalactic Reality: the Case of Gravitational Lensing”, Philosophy of Science 56:555-81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hacking, I. (1990), The Taming of Chance. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hacking, I. (1991), “The Making and Molding of Child Abuse”, Critical Inquiry 17: 253-288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hacking, I. (1992a), “Statistical Language, Statistical Truth and Statistical Reason: The Self-Authentication of a Style of Scientific Reasoning”, in Social Dimensions of Science, McMullen, Ernan (ed.). Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press, forthcoming, pp. 130-57.Google Scholar
Hacking, I. (1992b), “'Style’ for Historians and Philosophers”, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 23 (forthcoming).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hacking, I. (1992c), “The Disunities of the Sciences”, inDisunity and Contextualism, Galison, Peter (ed.), (forthcoming).Google Scholar
Jones, R.A. (1986), Emile Durkheim: An Introduction to Four Major Works. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Smart, J J.C. (1963), Philosophy and Scientific Realism. London, UK: Routledge & KeganPaul.Google Scholar