Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T06:08:34.826Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Schlick’s Critique of Positivism

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 January 2023

Joia Lewis
Joia Lewis*
Affiliation:
Indiana University
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

It is not well known that Moritz Schlick, whose name is inseparable from the development of logical positivism, was extremely critical of positivism prior to the 1920’s. The positivism Schlick found fault with was associated with the physicist Ernst Mach. Schlick went to considerable lengths to criticize Machian positivism on both epistemological and ontological grounds. He also objected to the positivist claim to be able to account for relativity theory within its framework.

Schlick’s views before his move to Vienna in 1922 have been labeled a “critical empiricist realism” (see Feigl 1938, p. xx) or a “structural realism” (Friedman 1983, p. 501). His exposure to the work of Ludwig Wittgenstein is generally held up as the crucial factor in turning him away from his early realist views towards positivism. There is general acknowledgment of a major change in Schlick’s philosophical thinking in the early 20’s; disagreement exists, however, over both the extent of the change and whether it was a positive or negative one.

Type
Part IV. History of Science
Information
PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association , Volume 1988 , Issue 1: Volume One: Contributed Papers 1988 , 1988 , pp. 110 - 117
Copyright
Copyright © Philosophy of Science Association 1988

References

Blackmore, J. (1972). Ernst Mach, His Work, Life, and Influence. Berkeley: University of Caifornia Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coffa, J. A. (forthcoming). To the Vienna Station: Semantics, Epistemology and the A Priori from Kant to Carnap.Google Scholar
Daum, A., (1982). “Schlick’s Empiricist Realism,” Synthese, 52: 449–493.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feigl, H. (1938). “Moritz Schlick, a Memoir”, in Philosophical Papers Vol. I. Edited by Mulder, H.L. and van de Velde-Schlick, B., Dordrecht: Reidel, 1978.Google Scholar
Friedman, M., (1983). “Moritz Schlick, Philosophical Papers,” Philosophy of Science, 50: 498–514.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schlick, M., (1925). General Theory of Knowledge. Lasalle, Illinois: Open Court, 1985.Google Scholar
Schlick, M., (1909-1922). Philosophical Papers Vol. I. Edited by Mulder, H.L. and van de Velde-Schlick, B., Dordrecht: Reidel, 1978.Google Scholar
Schlick, M., (1925-1936). Philosophical Papers Vol. II. Edited by Mulder, H.L. and van de Velde-Schlick, B., Dordrecht: Reidel, 1979.Google Scholar