Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-b95js Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-28T02:06:16.175Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Retrodiction in Geology

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 January 2023

David B. Kitts
David B. Kitts*
Affiliation:
University of Oklahoma
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Our view of the first half of the 20th century has been influenced by what we suppose to have occurred in the middle of that century. It is by now part of the conventional wisdom of the geological community that during the 1950’s and 1960’s a revolution occurred. It is further supposed by many, that before the revolution there was among geologists an uneasiness resulting from the lack of an organizing principle in terms of which accumulating facts could be understood. It is difficult to see our own times in the kind of perspective that historians consider so important an ingredient of ‘good’ history. Geologists now only in their middle years began their careers before the ‘new tectonics’ came to pervade their discipline. They do not look back upon prerevolutionary days as a time waiting to be saved from crisis nor do they see themselves as having collected facts in anticipation of being able to weave them into some pattern on the basis of some as yet undiscovered truth.

Type
Part VI. Philosophical Consequences of the Recent Revolution in Geology
Information
PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association , Volume 1978 , Issue 2: Volume Two: Symposia and Invited Papers 1978 , 1978 , pp. 215 - 226
Copyright
Copyright © 1981 Philosophy of Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

[1] Bateman, A.M. Economic Mineral Deposits. New York: John Wiley and Sons, 1950.Google Scholar
[2] Dunbar, C. O. and Rodgers, J. Principles of Stratigraphy. New York: John Wiley and Sons, 1957.Google Scholar
[3] Ghiselin, M.T. The Triumph of the Darwinian Method. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1969.Google Scholar
[4] Grünbaum, A. Philosophical Problems of Space and Time. New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1963.Google Scholar
[5] Hempel, C.G. Aspects of Scientific Explanation. New York: Free Press, 1965.Google Scholar
[6] Krinsley, D.H. and Donahue, J. “Environmental Interpretation of Sand Grain Surface Textures by Electron Microscopy.” Bulletin of the Geological Society of America 79(1968): 743–748.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[7] Leopold, L.B. and Langbein, W.B. “Association and Indeterminacy in Geomorphology.” In The Fabric of Geology. Edited by Albritton, C.C. Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley, 1963. Pages 184–192.Google Scholar
[8] Pettijohn, F.J. Sedimentary Rocks. 2nd ed. New York: Harper and Brothers, 1957.Google Scholar
[9] Schoff, S.L. “Geology of the Cedar Hills, Utah.” Bulletin of the Geological Society of America 62(1951): 619–646.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[10] Scriven, M. “Truisms as Grounds for Historical Explanations.” In Theories of History. Edited by Gardiner, P. Glencoe, Illinois: Free Press, 1959. Pages 443–475.Google Scholar
[11] Shrock, R.R. Sequence in Layered Rocks. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1948.Google Scholar