Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-5r2nc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-28T22:08:38.957Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Representational Reconstruction of Carnap's Quasianalysis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2022

Thomas Mormann
Thomas Mormann*
Affiliation:
Universität München
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

According to general wisdom, quasianalysis belongs to the large family of Carnap's ingenious, but finally failed contributions to epistemology and philosophy of science. In this paper I want to show that this is not the case. Rather, Carnapian quasianalysis is to be considered as a promising theory of a representational constitution of scientific objects. That is to say, I intend to embed Carnap's approach of quasianalytical constitution in the framework of a general theory of meaningful representation (cf. Mundy (1986)).

The outline of this paper is as follows: In section 2 I recall the basics of the quasianalytical approach, taking into consideration not only the well-known account in “Der Logische Aufbau der Welt” (Aufbau) but also a rather unknown first version of quasianalysis (“Quasizerlegung”) which Carnap developed in an unpublished manuscript written in 1923. This paper deserves attention not only for philosophicohistorical reasons, rather it contains quite a lot of interesting features of the quasianalytical approach which do not appear in the Aufbau account.

Type
Part II. Explanation, Induction, and Linguistic Representation
Information
PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association , Volume 1994 , Issue 1: Volume One: Contributed Papers 1994 , 1994 , pp. 96 - 104
Copyright
Copyright © 1994 by the Philosophy of Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bergstrom, L. (1993), “Quine, Underdetermination, and Skepticism”, The Journal of Philosophy 90: 331–358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brockhaus, K. (1963), Untersuchungen zu Carnaps Logischem Aufbau der Welt. Unpublished PhD dissertation, University of Muenster, Germany.Google Scholar
Carnap, R. (1923), Die Quasizerlegung, Ein Verfahren zur Ordnung nichthomogener Mengen mit den Mitteln der Beziehungslehre. Unpublished Manuscript RC-081-04-01, University of Pittsburgh.Google Scholar
Carnap, R. (1928), Der Logische Aufbau der Welt. (Aufbau). Hamburg: Meiner.Google Scholar
Goodman, N. (1954), The Structure of Appearance. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill.Google Scholar
Moulines, C.U. (1991), “Making Sense of Camap's Aufbau” Erkenntnis 35: 263–286.Google Scholar
Mundy, B. (1986), “On the General Theory of Meaningful Representation”, Synthese 67: 391–437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Proust, J. (1984), “Quasi-analyse et reconstruction logique du monde”, Fundamenta Scientiae 3: 285–303.Google Scholar
Quine, W.V.O. (1975), “On Empirically Equivalent Systems of the World”, Erkenntnis 9: 313–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar