Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-l4dxg Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-12T11:10:13.875Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Recent Revolution in Geology and Kuhn’s Theory of Scientific Change

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 January 2023

Rachel Laudan
Rachel Laudan*
Affiliation:
Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The 1960s witnessed a striking change in geology. Since at least the seventeenth century, one of the central problems of the subject had been the origin of the major irregularities of the surface of the globe—continents and oceans, mountain chains and ocean islands—irregularities that were not anticipated by most physical theories. Traditionally these features had usually been explained either as residual traces of events occurring during the very early history of the globe, or as the result of vertical movements of the earth’s crust, caused, for example, by changes in the heat budget. The last two decades have seen an end to all this. The vast majority of geologists now believe that these irregularities largely result from the lateral movement of thin rigid plates covering the earth, a theory now known as “plate tectonics”, but a theory which also has obvious parallels with the hypothesis of continental drift, in which it was postulated that continents can move laterally.

Type
Part VI. Philosophical Consequences of the Recent Revolution in Geology
Information
PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association , Volume 1978 , Issue 2: Volume Two: Symposia and Invited Papers 1978 , 1978 , pp. 227 - 239
Copyright
Copyright © 1981 Philosophy of Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

1

I am indebted to David Hull for first raising with me the question of why drift was accepted in the continued absence of a mechanism. Richard Burian, Henry Frankel, Lorenz Krüger, Larry Laudan, Walter Pilant and Victor Schmidt all made helpful comments on an earlier draft of this paper.

References

[1] Anderson, D.L. “The Plastic Layer of the Earth’s Mantle.” Scientific American 207 #1(1962): 52–59. (As reprinted in [29]. Pages 28–35.)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[2] Blackett, P.M.S., Bullard, Edward, and Runcorn, S.K. (eds.). A Symposium on Continental Drift. London: The Royal Society, 1965.Google Scholar
[3] Brush, S. “A Geologist Among Astronomers: The Rise and Fall of the Chamberlin-Moulton Controversy.” Journal for the History of Astronomy 9(1978): 1–41, 77-104).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[4] Cox, A. (ed.). Plate Tectonics and Geomagnetic Reversals. San Francisco: Freeman, 1973.Google Scholar
[5] Daly, R.A. Our Mobile Earth. New York and London: Scribner, 1926.Google Scholar
[6] Dietz, R.S. “Continent and Ocean Basin Evolution by Spreading of the Sea Floor.” Nature 190(1961): 854–857.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[7] Du Toit, A.L. Our Wandering Continents. Edinburgh: Oliver and Boyd, 1937.Google Scholar
[8] Frankel, H. “Alfred Wegener and the Specialists.” Centaurus 20(1976): 305–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[9] Frankel, H. “The Career of Continental Drift Theory: An Application of Imre Lakatos’ Analysis of Scientific Growth to the Rise of Drift Theory.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 10(1979): 21–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[10] Frankel, H. “The Reception and Acceptance of Continental Drift Theory as a Rational Episode in the History of Science.” In The Reception of Unconventional Science. (AAAS Selected Symposia Series.) Edited by Mauskopf, S.H. Boulder: Westview Press, 1979. Pages 51–89.Google Scholar
[11] Gould, S.J. “The Validation of Continental Drift.” In Ever Since Darwin: Reflections in Natural History. New York: Norton, 1977. Pages 160–167.Google Scholar
[12] Greene, M.T. Major Developments in Geotectonic Theory Between 1800 and 1912. Unpublished Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Washington, 1978. Xerox University Microfilms Publication No. 7820726.Google Scholar
[13] Hallam, A. A Revolution In the Earth Sciences: From Continental Drift to Plate Tectonics. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1973.Google Scholar
[14] Hess, H.H. “History of Ocean Basins.” In Petrologic Studies: A Volume to Honor A.J. Buddington. New York: Geological Society of America, 1962. Pages 599–620. (As reprinted in [4]. Pages 23-38.)Google Scholar
[15] Holmes, A. Principles of Physical Geology. London and Edinburgh: Nelson, 1945.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[16] Jeffreys, H. The Earth: Its Origin, History, and Physical Constitution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1st edition, 1924; 2nd edition, 1929; 3rd edition, 1952; 4th edition, 1959; 5th edition, 1970.Google Scholar
[17] Kitts, D.B. “Continental Drift and Scientific Revolution.” Bulletin of the American Association of Petroleum Geologists 58 (1974): 2490–2496. (As reprinted in The Structure of Geology. Dallas: Southern Methodist University Press, 1977. Pages 115–127.)Google Scholar
[18] Kuhn, T. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1962.Google Scholar
[19] Marvin, U.B. Continental Drift: The Evolution of a Concept. Washington, D.C.: Smithsonian Institution Press, 1973.Google Scholar
[20] McKenzie, D.P. “Plate Tectonics and Its Relationship to the Evolution of Ideas in the Geological Sciences.” Daedalus 106 #3 (1977): 97–124.Google Scholar
[21] Pinkham, G. “Some Doubts About Scientific Data.” Philosophy of Science 42(1975): 260–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[22] Runcorn, S.K. (ed.). Continental Drift. New York and London: Academic Press, 1962.Google Scholar
[23] Takeuchi, H., Uyeda, S., and Kanamori, H. Debate about the Earth: Approach to Geophysics through Analysis of Continental Drift. San Francisco: Freeman, 1967.Google Scholar
[24] Uyeda, S. The New View of the Earth: Moving Continents and Moving Oceans. San Francisco: Freeman, 1978.Google Scholar
[25] Wegener, A. Die Entstehung der Continente und Ozeane. Braunschweig: Friedrich Vieweg und Sohns, 1915. (Translated as [26].)Google Scholar
[26] Wegener, A. The Origin of Continents and Oceans, (trans.) Biram, John from the fourth (1924) German edition. New York: Dover, 1966. (Originally published as [25].)Google Scholar
[27] Wilson, J.T. “A New Class of Faults and Their Bearing on Continental Drift.” Nature 207(1965): 343–347. (As reprinted in [4]. Pages 48–56.)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[28] Wilson, J.T. “Static or Mobile Earth—the Current Scientific Revolution.” American Philosophical Society Proceedings. 112 (1968): 309–320.Google Scholar
[29] Wilson, J.T. (ed.). Continents Adrift. San Francisco: Freeman, 1970.Google Scholar
[30] Wilson, J.T. (ed.). Continents Adrift and Continents Aground. San Francisco: Freeman, 1976.Google Scholar