Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-cphqk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-30T07:00:22.591Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Rationality Between the Maximizers and the Satisficers

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2022

Alex C. Michalos
Alex C. Michalos*
Affiliation:
University of Guelp, Ontario
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

It is argued that by explicating rationality in terms of benefits balancing or outweighing costs instead of in terms of maximizing or satisficing something, a more adequate view of rationality is obtained.

Type
Part XII Inductive Logic
Information
PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association , Volume 1972 , 1972 , pp. 423 - 445
Copyright
Copyright © 1974 by D. Reidel Publishing Company

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

I would like to thank Myles Brand, Hugh Lehman, Michael Martin, Ian Mitroff, Michael Ruse and Gordon Welty for their thoughtful comments and encouragement.

References

Arrow, K. J.: 1951, Social Choice and Individual Values, John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York.Google Scholar
Bales, R. E.: 1971, ‘Act-Utilitarianism: Account of Right-making Characteristics or Decision-making Procedure?’, American Philosophical Quarterly 8, 257-265.Google Scholar
Bauer, R. A.: 1966, ‘Detection and Anticipation of Impact: the Nature of the Task’, Social Indicators (ed. by Bauer, R. A.), MIT Press, Cambridge, 1-67.Google Scholar
Braybrooke, D. and Lindblom, C. E.: 1963, A Strategy of Decision, Macmillan Co., New York.Google Scholar
Churchman, C. W.: 1961, Prediction and Optimal Decision, Prentice-Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs.Google Scholar
Davidson, D., Suppes, P., and Siegel, S.: 1957, Decision-Making: An Experimental Approach, Stanford University Press, Stanford.Google Scholar
Diesing, P.: 1950, ‘The Nature and Limitations of Economic Rationality’, Ethics 61, 12-26.10.1086/290743CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diesing, P.: 1955, ‘Non-Economic Decision-making’, Ethics 66, 18-35.10.1086/291027CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diesing, P.: 1962, Reason in Society, University of Illinois Press, Urbana.Google Scholar
Dror, Y.: 1968, Public Policymaking Reexamined, Chandler Publ. Co., San Francisco.Google Scholar
Duncan-Jones, A.: 1957, ‘Utilitarianism and Rules’, The Philosophical Quarterly 8, 364-367.10.2307/2217300CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friedrich, C. J.: 1964, ‘On Rereading Machiavelli and Althusius: Reason, Rationality, and Religion’, Rational Decision (ed. by Friedrich, C. J.), Atherton Press, New York, 1977-196.Google Scholar
Good, I. J.: 1962, ‘How Rational Should a Manager Be?’, Management Science 8, 383-393.10.1287/mnsc.8.4.383CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grauhan, R. R. and Strubelt, W.: 1971, ‘Political Rationality, Reconsidered: Notes on an Integrated Evaluative Scheme for Policy Choices’, Policy Sciences 2, 249-270.10.1007/BF01409868CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Helmer, O.: 1966, Social Technology, Basic Books, Inc., New York.Google Scholar
Kauder, E.: 1965, A History of Marginal Utility Theory, Princeton University Press, Princeton.10.1515/9781400877744CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knight, F. H.: 1921, Risk, Uncertainty and Profit, Houghton Mifflin Co., New York.Google Scholar
Kuhn, A.: 1963, The Study of Society, R. D. Irwin, Inc., Homewood.Google Scholar
Ladd, J.: 1964, ‘The Place of Practical Reason in Judicial Decision’, Rational Decision (ed. Friedrich, C. J.), Atherton Press, New York, pp. 126-144.Google Scholar
Luce, R. D. and Raiffa, H.: 1957, Games and Decisions, John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York.Google Scholar
Lyons, D.: 1965, Forms and Limits of Utilitarianism, Clarendon Press, Oxford.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198241973.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacRae, D.: 1968, ‘Utilitarian Ethics and Social Change’, Ethics 78, 188-198.Google Scholar
Malcolm, N.: 1950, ‘The Verification Argument’, Philosophical Analysis (ed. by Black, M.), Prentice-Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs, pp. 244-298.Google Scholar
March, J. G. and Simon, H. A.: 1958, Organizations, John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York.Google Scholar
Mason, R. O.: 1969, ‘A Dialectical Approach to Strategic Planning’, Management Science 15, 1 B403-B414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, D. W. and Starr, M. K.: 1960, Executive Decisions and Operations Research, Prentice-Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs.Google Scholar
Narveson, J.: 1967, Morality and Utility, The Johns Hopkins Press, Baltimore.Google Scholar
Neumann, J. von and Morgenstern, O.: 1944, Theory of Games and Economic Behavior, Princeton University Press, Princeton.Google Scholar
Pfiffner, J. M. and Sherwood, F. P.: 1960, Administrative Organization, Prentice-Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs.Google Scholar
Raiffa, H.: 1968, Decision Analysis, Addison-Wesley Publ. Co., Reading, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
Savage, L. J.: 1954, The Foundations of Statistics, John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York.Google Scholar
Schelling, T. C.: 1963, The Strategy of Conflict, Oxford University Press, New York.Google Scholar
Schwartz, T.: 1970, ‘On the Possibility of Rational Policy Evaluation’, Theory and Decision 1, 89-106.10.1007/BF00132454CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simon, H. A.: 1945, Administrative Behavior , Macmillan Co., New York.Google Scholar
Simon, H. A.: 1957, Models of Man, John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York.Google Scholar
Sobel, J. H.: 1970, ‘Utilitarianisms: Simple and General’, Inquiry 13, 394-449.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stein, H.: 1952, (ed.) Public Administration and Policy Development, Harcourt, Brace and Co., New York.Google Scholar
Taylor, V.: 1970, lsquo;How Much is Good Health Worth?’ Policy Sciences 1, 49-72.10.1007/BF00145192CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wagner, H. M.: 1969, Principles of Operations Research, Prentice-Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs.Google Scholar
Watkins, J.: 1970, ‘Imperfect Rationality’, Explanation in the Behavioral Sciences (ed. by Borger, R. and Cioffl, F.), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Werkmeister, W. H.: 1970, Historical Spectrum of Value Theories, Johnson Pub. Co., Lincoln.Google Scholar
Wolff, R. P.: 1970, ‘Maximization of Expected Utility as a Criterion of Rationality in Military Strategy and Foreign Policy’, Social Theory and Practice 1, 99-111.10.5840/soctheorpract1970117CrossRefGoogle Scholar