Hostname: page-component-6bf8c574d5-k2jvg Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-03-09T03:31:06.179Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Quantum Field Theory for Philosophers

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2022

Michael L.G. Redhead
Michael L.G. Redhead*
Affiliation:
Chelsea College, London
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

…the quantum theory of fields is the contemporary locus of metaphysical research. (Stein 1970, p. 285)

It is now generally recognized that Quantum Field Theory (QFT), after many vicissitudes and a period of almost total neglect, has emerged during the last ten years as a triumphant framework in which to do elementary particle physics.

If philosophers are prepared to use current physical theory as a guide to resolving metaphysical questions (and that is a big “If”), then QFT is what philosophers should all be studying. But the subject is notoriously.recondite, and philosophers are busy people, so the objective of the present paper is to cut through all technicalities and try to tell in as straightforward a way as possible just what QFT has to say about “reality”.

Type
Part I. High-Energy Physics
Information
PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association , Volume 1982 , Issue 2: Volume Two: Symposia and Invited Papers 1982 , 1982 , pp. 57 - 99
Copyright
Copyright © 1983 Philosophy of Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

1

Edward MacKinnon, Andrew Pickering, Michael Redhead and Paul Teller provided very helpful comments on a preliminary draft of this paper.

References

Audi, M. (1973). The Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics. Chicago-London: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Barnette, R.L. (1978). “Does Quantum Mechanics Disprove the Principle of the Identity of Indiscernibles?” Philosophy of Science 45: 466-470.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bohr, N. and Rosenfeld, L. (1933). “Zur Frage der Messbarkeit der Electromagnetischen Feldgrössen.” Det Kongelige Danske-Videnskabernes Selskab Mathematisk-fysiske Meddelelser 12 (8): 1-65. (As translated in Selected Papers of Leon Rosenfeld. (Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science. Volume 21.) (eds.) Cohen, R.S. and Stachel, J.J.. Dordrecht: D. Reidel. Pages 357-400.Google Scholar
Bohr, N. and Rosenfeld, L. (1950). “Field and Charge Measurements in Quantum Electrodynamics.” Physical Review 78: 794-798.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boltzmann, L. (1877). “Über die Beziehung zwlicher dem zweiten Hauptsatze der mechanischen Wärmetheorie und der Wahrscheinlichkeitsrechnung.” Wissenschaftliche Abhandlungen 2: 164-223.Google Scholar
Boltzmann, L. (1897). Vorlesungen ueber die Prinoipe der Mechanik I. Theil. Leipzig:Verlag von Johann Ambrosius Barth.Google Scholar
Bromberg, J. (1976). “The Concept of Particle Creation before and after Quantum Mechanics.” Historical Studies In the Physical Sciences 7: 161-191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bromberg, J. (1977). “Dirac's Quantum Eletrodynamics and the Wave-Particle Equivalence.” In History of Twentieth Century Physics. Edited by Heiner, C.. New York: Academic Press. Pages 147-157.Google Scholar
Brown, H.R. and Redhead, M.L.G. (1981). “A Critique of the Disturbance Theory of Indeterminacy in Quantum Mechanics.” Foundations of Physics 11: 1-20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Casimir, H.B.G. (1948). “On the Attraction between Two Perfectly Conducting Plates.” Kongelige Nederlandse akademie van wetensohappen 51: 793-795.Google Scholar
Cortes, A. (1976). “Leibniz's Principle of the Identity of Indiscernibles: A False Principle.” Philosophy of Science 43: 491-505.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cushing, J.T. (1982). “Models and Methodologies in Current Theoretical High-Energy Physics.” Synthese 50: 5-101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dell'Antonio, G.F.; Greenberg, D.W.; and Sudarshan, E.C.G., (1964). “Parastatistlcs: Axiomatic Formulation, Connection with Spin and Statistics and TCP Theorem for a General Field Theory.” In Group Theoretical Concepts and Methods In Elementary Particle Physics. Edited by Gursey, F.. New York-London: Gordon and Breach. Pages 403-407.Google Scholar
Dirac, P.A.M. (1927). “The Quantum Theory of the Emission, and Absorption of Radiation.” Proceedings of the Royal Society of London A 114: 243-265.Google Scholar
Doran, B.G. (1975). “Origins and Consolidation of Field Theories in : Nineteenth-Century Britain: From the Mechanical to the Electromagnetic View of Nature.” Historical Studies in the Physical Sciences 6: 133-260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dyson, F.J. (1951). “Heisenberg Operators in Quantum Electrodynamics.” Physical Review 82: 428-439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elkana, Y. (1974). The Discovery of the Conservation of Energy. London: Hutchinson.Google Scholar
Faraday, M. (1844). “A Speculation touching Electric Conduction and the Nature of Matter.” Philosophical Magazine 24: 136-144. (As reprinted in Experimental Researches In Electricity. Volume II. London: R. and J.E. Taylor, 1844. Pages 284-293.Google Scholar
Fermi, E. (1932). “Quantum Theory of Radiation.” Reviews of Modern Physics 4: 87-132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fermi, E. (1933). “Tentativo di una Teoria dell’ Emissione dei Raggi “Beta”. Ricerca Scientifica 2: 491-495.Google Scholar
Freedman, D.Z. and Van Nieuwenhuizen, P. (1978). “Supergravity and the Unification of the Laws of Physics.” Scientific American 238(2): 126-143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ginsberg, A. (1981). “Quantum Theory and Identity of Indiscernibles Revisited.” Philosophy of Science 48: 487-491.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Green, H.S. (1953). “A Generalized Method of Field Quantization.” Physical Review 90: 270-273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greenberg, O.W. (1964). “Spin and Unitary-Spin Independence in a Paraquark Model of Baryons and Mesons.” Physical Review Letters 13: 598-602.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, A.R. and Hall, M.B. (eds.). (1962). Unpublished Scientific Papers Of Isaac Newton. London: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Halpern, F.R. (1968). Special Relativity and Quantum Mechanics. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Heilbron, J.L. (1979). Electricity in the 17th and 18th Centuries: A Study of Early Modern Physics. Berkeley: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heimann, P.M. and MeGuire, J.E. (1971). “Newtonian Forces and Lockean Powers: Concepts of Matter in Eighteenth Century Thought.” Historical Studies In the Physical Sciences 3: 233-306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jauch, J.M. and Piron, C. (1967). “Generalized Localizability.” Helvetica Physica Acta 40: 559-570.Google Scholar
Joos, H. (1962). “Zur Darsteliungstheorie der Inhomogenen Lorentzgruppe als Grundlage Quantenmechanischer Kinematik;” Fortschritte der Physik 10: 65-146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koba, Z. (1949). “Semi-Classical Treatment of the Reactive Corrections. I. The Anomalous Magnetic Moment of the Electron.” Progress of Theoretical Physics 4: 319-330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maimonides, M. (1904). The Guide for the Perplexed. English translation from the original Arabic text by Friedlander, M.. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
McCormmach, R. (1970). “H.A. Lorentz and the Electromagnetic View of Nature.” Isis. 61: 459-497.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGuire, J.E. (1974). “Forces, Powers, Aethers and Fields.” In Methodological and Historical Essays in the Natural and Social ‘Sciences. (Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science. Volume XIV.) Edited by Cohen, R.S and Wartofsky, M.W. Dordrecht: Reidel. Pages 119-159.Google Scholar
Messiah, A.M.L. and Greenberg, O.W. (1964). “Symmetrization Postulate and Its Experimental Foundation.” Physical Review 36B: 248-267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Misner, C.W. (1974). “Some Topics for Philosophical Enquiry Concerning the Theories of Mathematical Geometrodynamics and of Physical Geometrodynamics.” In PSA 1972. Edited by Schaffner, K.F. and Cohen, R.S. Dordrecht: Reidel. Pages 7-29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mulvey, J.H. (ed.). (1981). The Nature of Matter. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Newton, T.D. and Wigner, E.P. (1949). “Localized States for Elementary Systems.” Reviews of Modern Physics 21: 400-406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newton-Smith, W.H. (1981). The Rationality of Science. Boston-London-Henley: Routledge and Kegan Paul.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pickering, A. (1981). Constructing Quarks: The Road to Unity in High-Energy Physics. Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
Post, H.R. (1963). “Individuality and Physics.” The Listener 70: 534-537.Google Scholar
Prigogine, I . (1962). Noneouilibrium Statistical Mechanics. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Redhead, M.L.G. (1975). “Symmetry in Intertheory Relations.” Synthese 32: 77-112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Redhead, M.L.G. (1977). “Wave-Particle Duality.” The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 28: 65-80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Redhead, M.L.G. (1980a). “Some Philosophical Aspects of Particle Physics.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 11: 279-304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Redhead, M.L.G. (1980b). “Models in Physics.” The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 31; 145-163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Redhead, M.L.G. (1983). “Nonlocality and Peaceful Coexistence.” In Space. Tine and Causality. Edited by Swinburne, R.. Dordrecht: Reidel. Pages 151-189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schaffner, K.F. (1972). Nineteenth-Century Aether Theories. Oxford: Pergamon.Google Scholar
Schweber, S.S. (1961). An Introduction to Relativistic Quantum Field Theory. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Silliman, R.H. (1963). “William Thomson: Smoke Rings and Nineteenth Century Atomism.” Isis 54: 461-474.Google Scholar
Sparnaay, M.J. (1958). “Measurements of Attractive Forces between Flat Plates.” Physica 24: 751-764.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stein, H. (1970). “On the Notion of Field in Newton, Maxwell and Beyond.” In Historical and Philosophical Perspectives of Science. (Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science. Volume 5.) Edited by Stuewer, R.H.. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. Pages 264-287.Google Scholar
Stolt, R.H. and Taylor, J.R. (1970a). “Classification of Paraparticles.” Physical Review D 1: 2226-2228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stolt, R.H. and Taylor, J.R. (1970b). “Correspondence between the First- and Second-Quantized Theories of Paraparticles.” Nuclear Physics B19: 1-19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Teller, P. (1983). “Quantum Physics, The Identity of Indiscernibles, and Some Unanswered Questions.” Philosophy of Science 50: 309-319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Theobald, D.W. (1966). The Concept of Energy. London: E. and F.N. Spon.Google Scholar
Van Nieuwenhuizen, P., (1981). “Supergravity.” Physics Reports 68: 189-398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weinberg, S. (1964a). “Feynman Rules for Any Spin.” Physical Review 133 B: 1318-1332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weinberg, S. (1964b). “Feynman Rules for Any Spin. II. Massless Particles.” Physical Review 134 B: 882-896.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weinberg, S. (1977). “The Search for Unity: Notes for a History of Quantum Field Theory.” Daedelus 106(4): 17-35.Google Scholar
Weisskopf, V.F. (1981). “The Development of Field Theory in the Last 50 years.” Physics Today 34(11): 69-85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Welton, T.A. (1948). “Some Observable Effects of the Quantum-Mechanical Fluctuations of the Electromagnetic Field.” Physical Review 74: 1157-1167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wentzel, G. (1949). Quantum Theory of Fields. New York: Interscience.Google Scholar
Wentzel, G. (1960). “Quantum Theory of Fields (until 1947).” In Theoretical Physics in the Twentieth Century. Edited by Fierz, M. and Weiskopf, V.F.. New York: Interscienee. Pages 48-77. (As reprinted in Mehra, J. (ed.). The Physicist's Conception of Nature. Dordrecht: Reidel, 1973. Pages 380-403.Google Scholar
Whittaker, E.T. (1951). A History of the Theories of Aether and Electricity: I. The Classical Theories. London: Nelson.Google Scholar
Wiggins, D. (1963). “The Individuation of Things and Places. I.” The Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 37: 177-202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wightman, A.S. (1962). “On the Localizability of Quantum Mechanical Systems.” Reviews of Modern Physics 34: 845-872.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wightman, A.S. (1972). “The Dirac Equation.” In Aspects of Quantum Theory. Edited by Salam, A. and Wigner, E.P.. London: Cambridge university Press. Pages 95-115.Google Scholar
Wigner, E.P. (1939). “On Unitary Representations of the Inhomogeneous : Lorentz Group.” Annals of Mathematics 40: 149-204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wigner, E.P. (1950). “Do the Equations of Motion Determine the Quantum Mechanical Commutation Relations?” Physical Review 77: 711-712.CrossRefGoogle Scholar