Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-d8cs5 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-12T09:15:16.776Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Problems in the Development of Cognitive Neuroscience Effective Communication between Scientific Domains

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 January 2023

Edward Manier
Edward Manier*
Affiliation:
University of Notre Dame
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Could anything provide a philosophically convincing mark of the mental in simple organisms (Lloyd 1984)? Individual organisms’ capacities to modify behavior adaptively as a result of past encounters with the environment might mark the first step in the phylogeny of minds. The simplest examples of mental representation are likely to be found in the simplest forms of animal learning.

The most scientifically rigorous test case of “bottom- up” strategies in cognitive neuroscience is provided by current studies of the cellular and molecular biology of associative learning in higher invertebrates, but particularly gastropod molluscs, snails or slugs (Quinn 1984). For the relevant neurobiological research community (Farley and Alkon 1985; Hawkins, Clark, and Kandel 1986), “Bottom-up” does not just mean letting one’s study of the properties of the nervous system control one’s analyses of animal behavior or cognition.

Type
Part III. Psychology
Information
PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association , Volume 1986 , Issue 1: Volume One: Contributed Papers 1986 , 1986 , pp. 183 - 197
Copyright
Copyright © Philosophy of Science Association 1986

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

1

The research for this paper was conducted while I was a Visiting Scholar in the Department of Philosophy, Columbia University, the guest of Dr. Walter Bock, Department of Life Sciences, Columbia University, a student in several courses offered by the Columbia Center for Molecular Neurobiology and Behavior, and a student in the Summer Course in Cellular and Molecular Biology of Behavior at Cold Spring Harbor, during a sabbatical year supported by my University and my mother and father, Mr. and Mrs. F.V. Manier. During that year I enjoyed the conversation of Eric Kandel, Irving Kupferman, Vince Castellucci, Ruth Colwill, Hillel Chiel, James Schwartz, Arthur Danto, Herbert Roitblat, and Herbert Terrace. More recently, I have had the opportunity to discuss my findings with Dudley Shapere, whose views concerning the development of scientific domains (1984J , have influenced this formulation of my results. The paper is dedicated to my father’s memory.

References

Carew, T.J.; Walters, E.T. and Kandel, Eric R (1981). “Classical Conditioning of a Simple Withdrawal Reflex in Aplysia californioa.” Journal of Neuroscience 1: 1426–1437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carew, T.J.; Hawkins, R.D. and Kandel, Eric. R (1983). “Differential Classical Conditioning of a Defensive Withdrawal Reflex in Aplysia californioa.” Science 219: 397–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Churchland, Patricia. (1980). “A Perspective on Mind-Brain Research.” Journal of Philosophy 77: 185–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Churchland, Paul. (1985). “Reduction, Qualia, and the Direct Inspection of Brain States.” The Journal of Philosophy 82: 8–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Churchland, Paul. (1986). “Cognitive Neurobiology: A Computational Hypothesis for Laminar Cortex.” Biology and Philosophy 1: 25–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coleman, W. (1985). “The Cognitive Basis of the Discipline. Claude , Bernard on Physiology.” Isis 76: 49–70.Google ScholarPubMed
Colwill, Rut and Bescorla, Robert A (1985). “Postconditioning Devaluation of a Reinforcer Affects Instrumental Responding.” Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes 1: 120–132.Google Scholar
Cummins, R. (1983). The Nature of Psychological Explanation. Cambridge, MA: Bradford Press.Google Scholar
Danto, A.C. (1984). “Outline of a Theory of Sentential States.” Social Research 51; 1001–1017.Google Scholar
Dickinson, A. (1980). Contemporary Animal Learning Theory. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Farley, J. and Alkon, D.L (1985). “Cellular Mechanisms of Learning, Memory and Information Storage.” Annual Review of Psychology 36: 419–494.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gallistel, C.R. (1980). The Organization of Action: A New Synthesis. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Gardner, H. (1985). The Mind’s Hew Science: A History of the Cognitive Revolution. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Gelperin, A.; Hopfield, J.J. and Tank, D.W (in press). “The Logic of Limax Learning.” In Model Neural Networks and Behavior. Edited by A.I. Selverston. New York: Plenum.Google Scholar
Gormezano, I. and Kehoe, J. (1975). “Classical Conditioning: Some Methodological-Conceptual Issues.” In Handbook of Learning and Cognitive Processesr Volume 2. Edited by W.K. Estes. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. Pages 143-179.Google Scholar
Habermas, J. (1981). Theorie de kommunikativen Handelns. Frankfurt: Surkamp Verlag. (As reprinted as The Theory of Communicative Action; Reason and the Rationalization of Society , Volume 1. (trans.) T. McCarthy. Boston: Beacon.)Google Scholar
Hawkins, R.D.; Abrams, T.H.; Carew, T.J. and Kandel, E.R. (1983). “A Cellular Mechanism of Classical Conditioning in Aplysia : activity-dependent amplification of presynaptic facilitation.” Science 219: 400–405.Google ScholarPubMed
Hawkins, R.D.; Abrams, T.H; Carew, T.J. and Kandel, E.R (1984). “Is There a Cell Biological Alphabet for Simle Forms of Learning?” Psychological Review 91: 375–391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hawkins, R.D. and Kandel, E.R (1986). “Cell Biological Studies of Learning in Simple Vertebrate and Invertebrate Systems.” In Handbook of Physiology. Bethesda, MD: American Physiological Society, (in press).Google Scholar
Hodgkin, A.L.; Huxley, A.F. and Katz, B. (1952). “Measure of Current- Voltage Relations in the Membrane of the Giant Axon of Loligo.” Journal of Physiology 116: 424–506; 117: 500-544.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hull, C.L. (1943). Principles of Behavior. New York: Appleton Century.Google Scholar
Kandel, E.R. and Spencer, W.A (1968). “Cellular Neurophysiological Approaches to the Study of Learning.” Physiological Review 48: 65–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kandel, E.R. and Spencer, W.A (1979). “Cellular Insights into Behavior and Learning.” In The Harvey Lectures. Edited by D. Marcus. New York: Academic Press. Pages 19-92.Google Scholar
Kandel, E.R. and Spencer, W.A (1984). “Steps toward a Molecular Grammar for Learning, Explorations into the Nature of Memory.” Tn Medicine, Science, and Society. Edited by K.J. Isselbacher. New York: Wiley. Pages 555-604.Google Scholar
Kandel, E.R. and Spencer, W.A (1985). Unpublished lectures at Cold Spring Harbor Summer Course on Cellular and Molecular Biology of Behavior, Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.Google Scholar
Knorr-Cetina, K. (1981). The Manufacture of Knowledge. New York: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
Lashley, K. (1951). “The Problem of Serial Order in Behavior.” In Cerebral Mechanisms in Behavior. Edited by L.A. Jeffress. New York: Wiley. Pages 112-136. [The Hixon Symposium, 1948].Google Scholar
Lloyd, Dan. (1984). “Simple Minds: Prolegomena to a Unified Cognitive Science.11 APA—Eastern Division.Google Scholar
Mackintosh, N.J. (1983). Conditioning and Associative Learning. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Manier, Edward; (1980). “Darwin’s Language and Logic.” Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science 11: 305–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manier, Edward. (1986). “The Cell Biology of Simple Computations.” manuscript.Google Scholar
Pavlov, I. (1924). Conditioned Reflexes: An Investigation of the Physiological Activity of the Cerebral Cortex. (As reprinted (trans, and ed.) O.V. Anrep. New York: Dover, 1960. From lectures at the Military Medical Academy, Petrograd, USSR.)Google Scholar
Pearce, J.M. and Hall, G (1980). “A Model of Pavlovian Learning: Variations in the Effectiveness of Conditioned But Not of Unconditioned Stimuli.” Psychological Review 87: 532–552.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pickering, A. (1984). Constructing Quarks. A Sociological History of Particle Physics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Quinn, W.G. (1984). “Work in Invertebrates on the Mechanisms Underlying Learning.” In The Biology of Learning. Edited by P. Marler and H. Terrace. Berlin: Springer-Verlag. Pages 197-246.Google Scholar
Rescorla, R.A (1967). “Pavlovian Conditioning and Its Proper Control Procedures.” Psychological Review 74; 71–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rescorla, R.A. and Wagner, Allan, R (1972). “A Theory of Pavlovian Conditioning: Variations in the Effectiveness of Reinforcement ‘ and Nonreinforcement.” In Classical Conditioning , II. Edited by A.H. Black and W.R. Prokasy. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts. Pages 64-99.Google Scholar
Roitblat, H.L. (1982). “The Meaning of Representation in Animal Memory.” The Behavioral and Brain Sciences 5: 353–406.Google Scholar
Roitblat, H.L. (1986). Introduction to Comparative Cognition. San Francisco: W.H. Freeman. (In press).Google Scholar
Sahley, Christie; Rudy, J.H. and Gelperin, A. (1981). “An Analysis of Associative Learning in a Terrestrial Mollusc: I. Higher-Order Conditioning, Blocking and a Transient US Pre-Exposure Effect.” Journal of Comparative Physiology: A 144: 1—8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shapere, D. (1984). Reason and the Search for Knowledge. Dordrecht: Reidel.Google Scholar
Sherrington, C.S. (1906). The Integrative Action of the Nervous System. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Tolman, E.C. (1948). “Cognitive Maps in Rats and Men.” Psychological Review 55: 189–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wagner, Allan R. (1981). “SOP. A Model of Automatic Memory Processing in Animal Behavior.” In Information Processing in Animals: Memory Mechanisms. Edited by N.E. Spear and R.R. Miller. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. Pages 5-47.Google Scholar