Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T19:01:02.118Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Philosophers of Experiment

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2022

Ian Hacking
Ian Hacking*
Affiliation:
University of Toronto
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The Neglect of Experiment: that is the title of Alan Franklin's (1986). He did not mean to imply that scientists were neglecting experiments, spinning well financed cobwebs of theories while laboratories decayed for lack of funds. He meant that historians and philosophers neglected the experimental side of science. That was true, and is no longer so. Although his title was fine when he was writing, the times have passed it by.

A decade before there had been almost no reflective philosophy of experiment. What little had been published was not seen as writing about experiment—that was not something to write about—but as discussion of the theory/observation distinction, or the impossibility of eliminating a theory by crucial experiment, etc. The even-handed Dictionary of Scientific Biography discreetly cut articles on experimenters and expanded those on theorists. Thaddeus Trenn's (1977) on the experimental discovery of isotopes was poorly received.

Type
Part V. Experiment
Information
PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association , Volume 1988 , Issue 2: Volume Two: Symposia and Invited Papers 1988 , 1988 , pp. 147 - 156
Copyright
Copyright © 1989 by the Philosophy of Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Achinstein, P. and Hannaway, O. (eds). (1985), Observation, Experiment and Hypothesis in Modern Physical Science. Cambridge, Mass.: M.I.T. Press.Google Scholar
Ackermann, R. (1985), Data, Instruments, and Theory: A Dialectical Approach to Understanding Science. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baird, D. (1988), “Five Theses on Instrumental Realism”, PSA 1988, 1: 165–173.Google Scholar
Batens, D. and van Bendegem, J. P. (eds.). (1988), Theory and Experiment: Recent Insights and New Perspectives on their Relation. Dordrecht: Reidel.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Braithwaite, R.B. (1953), Scientific Explanation (1946 Tarner Lectures). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Cartwright, N. (1983), How the Laws of Physics Lie. Oxford: Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crombie, A.C. (1981), “Philosophical Presuppositions and Shifting Interpretations of Galileo”, in Probabalistic Thinking, Thermodynamics and the Interaction of the History and Philosophy of Science, Hintikka, J. et. al. (eds.). Dordrecht: Reidel.Google Scholar
Fleck, L. (1935), Entstehung und Entwicklung einer wissenschaftlicher Tatsache. Einfuehrung in die Lehre vom Denkstil und Denkcollectiv. Basel: Schwabe. Bradley, F. and Trenn, T. (trans.) (1979), Genesis and Development of a Scientific Fact. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
Franklin, A. (1986), The Neglect of Experiment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fuller, S. (1988), Social Epistemology. Bloomington, Ind: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Gilbert, G.N. and Mulkay, M. (1984), “Experiments are the Key: Participants’ Histories and Historians’ Histories of Science”, Isis 75: 105-25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gooding, D., Schaffer, S., and Pinch, T. (eds.). (1989), The Uses of Experiment: Studies of Experimentation in the Natural Sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Goodman, N. (1978), Ways of Worldmaking. Indianapolis: Hackett.Google Scholar
Hacking, I. (1982), “Language, Truth and Reason”, in Rationality and Relativism, Hollis, M. and Lukes, S. (eds.). Oxford, Blackwell: pp. 48–66. Enlarged in “Styles of Scientific Reasoning”, in Post-Analytic Philosophy, Rajchmann, J. and West, C. (eds.) New York: Columbia University Press, 1985, pp. 146-165.Google Scholar
Hacking, I. (1983), Representing and Intervening. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hacking, I. (1988a), “The Sociology of Knowledge about Child Abuse”, Nous 22: 53–63, followed by comment by B. Latour, 64-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hacking, I. (1988b), “The Participant Irrealist at Large in the Laboratory”, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 39: 277–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hacking, I. (1988c), “On the Stability of Laboratory Science”, The Journal of Philosophy, 85:507-14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heelan, P. (1988), “After Experiment: Realism and Research”, The Journal of Philosophy, 85: 515–524.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keller, E. F. (1985), Reflections on Gender and Science. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Latour, B. and Woolgar, S. (1979), Laboratory Life: The Social Construction of Scientific Facts, Sage, Beverly Hills and London. Second unaltered edition with additional preface and the word “Social” stricken from the subtitle on the grounds that it is redundant, Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1986.Google Scholar
Latour, B. (1987), Science in Action. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar
MacKenzie, D. (1981), Statistics in Britain 1865-1930: The Social Construction of Scientific Knowledge. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
McMullin, E. (1988a), “The Shaping of Scientific Rationality: Construction and Constraint”, in McMullin 1988b, pp. 1–48.Google Scholar
McMullin, E. (ed.) (1988b), Construction and Constraint: The Shaping of Scientific Rationality. Notre Dame, Ind.: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
Merchant, C. (1980), The Death of Nature. San Francisco: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Pickering, A. (1984), Constructing Quarks: A Sociological History of Particle Physics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Pickering, A. (forthcoming), “Big Science as a Form of Life:, in The Restructuring of the Physical Sciences in Europe and the United States, 1945-1960, de Maria, M. and Grilli, M. (eds.). World Scientific Publishing, Singapore, de Maria and Grilli.Google Scholar
Radder, H. (1988), The Material Realization of Science. Assen/Maastrict: van Gorcum.Google Scholar
Ravetz, J.R. (1971), Scientific Knowledge and its Social Problems. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Robinson, J.D. (1986), “Appreciating Key Experiments”, British Journal for the History of Science 19: 51–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rorty, R. (1988), “Is Science a Natural Kind?” in McMullin, E. (1988b). 49–74.Google Scholar
Shapin, S. and Schaffer, S. (1986), Leviathan and the Air Pump: Hobbes, Boyle and the Experimental Life. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Stump, D. (1988), “The Role of Skill in Experimentation”, PSA 1988, 1: 302–311.Google Scholar
Suppes, P. (1979), “The Plurality of Science”, PSA 1978, 2: 3–16.Google Scholar
Trenn, T. (1977), The Self-Spitting Atom: A Study of the Rutherford-Soddy Collaboration. Taylor and Francis: London.Google Scholar
Williams, B. (1985), Ethics and The Limits of Philosophy. Cambridge, Mass.:Harvard University Press.Google Scholar