Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-8bhkd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-08T02:23:44.680Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Only Real Probabilities in Quantum Mechanics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2022

Nancy Cartwright
Nancy Cartwright*
Affiliation:
Stanford University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Position probabilities play a privileged role in the interpretation of quantum mechanics. The quantum wave function (usually designated “Ψ(r)’) cannot itself represent a physical quantity, because it is complex valued. Its square — |Ψ(r)|2 — however, is real; and it is |Ψ(r)|2 which is the fundamental interpreted quantity of the theory. Schrödinger, who originated wave mechanics, interpreted |Ψ(r)|2 as the density of a charged particle; but this suggestion was inadequate. A principal reason is that, for most physical systems, |Ψ(r)|2 spreads out in time, whereas particles themselves do not. Schrödinger's interpretation was replaced by Born who introduced probabilities into quantum mechanics. Born urged that |Ψ(r)|2 represents not the density of the system in space, but rather a probability density. This is almost universally how quantum mechanics is taught today: |Ψ(r)|2 gives the probability that a system in state Ψ(r) is located at r.

Type
Part II. Philosophy of Physics
Information
PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association , Volume 1978 , Issue 1: Volume One: Contributed Papers 1978 , 1978 , pp. 54 - 59
Copyright
Copyright © 1978 by the Philosophy of Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Born, M. “Zur Quantenmechanik der Stossvorgänge.” Zeitschrift für Physik. 37(1926): 863–867.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Born, M. “Quantemechanik der Stossvorgänge.” Zeitschrift für Physik. 38(1926): 803–827.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Born, M. “Zur Wellenmechanik der Stossvorgänge.” Gottinger Nachrichten (1926): 146–160.Google Scholar
Born, M. “Das Adiabatenprinzip in der Quantenmechanik.” Zeitschrift für Physik 40(1926): 167–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Born, M. and Fock, V. “Beweis des Adiabatensatzes.” Zeitschrift für Physik 51(1928): 165–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cartwright, N. “Measuring Position Probabilities.” Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
Fine, Arthur. “On the Completeness of Quantum Theory.” In Logic and Probability in Quantum Mechanics. (Synthese Library 78). Edited by Suppes, P. Dordrecht: D. Reidel, 1976. Pages 249–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fine, Arthur. “Probability and the Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics.” British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 24(1973): 1–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fine, Arthur. “Some Conceptual Problems of Quantum Theory.” In Paradigms and Paradoxes. (University of Pittsburgh Series in Philosophy of Science, Volume 5). Edited by Colodny, R. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press, 1972. Pages 3–31.Google Scholar
Margenau, H. The Nature of Physical Reality. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1950.Google Scholar
Margenau, H. and Cohen, L. “Probabilities in Quantum Mechanics.” Edited by Bunge, M. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 1967. Pages 67–89.Google Scholar
Putnam, H. “How to Think Quantum Logically.” In Logic and Probability in Quantum Mechanics. Edited by Suppes, P. Dordrecht: D. Reidel, 1976. Pages 47–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Putnam, H. “Is Logic Empirical?” In Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, Volume 5. Dordrecht: D. Reidel, 1969. Pages 216–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schrodinger, E. “Quantisierung als Eigenwertproblem.” Annalen der Physik 79(1926): 361–376, 489-527; 80(1926): 437-490; 81(1926): 109-139. (English translation in Collected Papers on Wave Mechanics. London: Blackie & Sons, 1928. Pages 1-40, 62-123.)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schrodinger, E. “Der stetige übergang von der Mikro-zur Makromechanik.” Die Naturwissenschaften 14(1926): 664–666. (English translation in Schrödinger, E. Collected Papers on Wave Mechanics. London: Blackie & Sons, 1928. Pages 41-44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
von Neumann, J. Mathematical Foundations of Quantum Mechanics. (trans.) Beyer, Robert T.. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1955. (Originally published as Mathematische Grundlagen der Quantenmechanik. Berlin: Julius Springer-Verlag, 1932.)Google Scholar
Wigner, Eugene P. “Epistemological Perspective on Quantum Theory.” In Contemporary Research in the Foundations and Philosophy of Quantum Theory. (The University of Western Ontario Series in Philosophy of Science, Volume 2.) Edited by Hooker, C.A. Dordrecht: D. Reidel, 1973. Pages 369–385.Google Scholar
Wigner, Eugene P. “Physics and the Explanation of Life.” Foundations of Physics 1(1970): 33–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wigner, Eugene P. “Remarks on the Mind-Body Question.” In The Scientist Speculates. Edited by Good, I.J. London: William Heinemann, 1962. Pages 284–302.Google Scholar
Wigner, Eugene P. “Two Kinds of Reality.” The Monist 48(1964): 248–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar