Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T17:06:15.547Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

On Writing the History of Special Relativity

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2022

John Earman
Affiliation:
University of Minnesota
Clark Glymour
Affiliation:
University of Pittsburgh
Robert Rynasiewicz
Affiliation:
Cornell University

Extract

Einstein himself had a few words to say about the writing of the history of science. From the first of his famous conversations with Einstein, Robert Shankland relates: “Then he gave me his ideas on historical writing of science. ‘Nearly all historians of science are philologists and do not comprehend what physicists were aiming at, how they thought and wrestled with their problems… .’ The struggle with their:problems, their trying everything to find a solution which came at last often by very indirect means, is the correct picture.” (Shankland 1963, p. 50).

Why should we take these words seriously? After all, Einstein was not an historian, and, unless we are to pose him as an authority on every topic, these comments represent but a personal opinion. This, however, is precisely why they should be taken seriously, if we are interested in the history of Einstein's own accomplishments.

Type
Part VIII. Einstein's Discovery/Invention Of Special Relativity
Copyright
Copyright © 1983 Philosophy of Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

1

Robert Rynasiewicz would like to acknowledge the support of the Andrew Mellon Foundation for postdoctoral fellowships held with the Department of History and Philosophy of Science, University of Pittsburgh and with the Sage School of Philosophy, Cornell University.

References

Abraham, M. (1902). “Dynamik des Elektrons.” Göttinger Nachrichten 20-41.Google Scholar
Abraham, M. (1903). “Prinzipien der Dynamik des Elektrons.” Annalen der Physik 10: 105-179.Google Scholar
Einstein, A. (1905). “Zur Elektrodynamik bewegter Körper.” Annalen der Physik 17: 891-921. (As reprinted as “On the Electrodynamics of Moving Bodies.” In Lorentz, H.A. et al. The Principle of Relativity: A Collection of Original Memoirs on the Special and General Theories of Relativity, (trans.) W. Perrett and G.B. Jeffrey. New York: Dover, 1952. Pages 37-65.Google Scholar
Einstein, A. (1907). “Über das Relativitätsprinzip und die aus demselben gezogenen Folgerungen.” Jahrbuch der Radioaktivität. und Elektronik 4: 411-462.Google Scholar
Einstein, A. (1949). “Autobiographical Notes.” In Albert Einstein: Philosopher-Scientist. Volume One. (Library of Living Philosophers, Volume VII.) Edited by Schilpp, P.A.. Evanston: The Library of Living Philosophers. Pages 2-94.Google Scholar
Grünbaum, A. (1961). “The Genesis of the Special Theory of Relativity.” In Current Issues in the Philosophy of Science. Edited by Feigl, Herbert and Maxwell, Grover. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston. Pages 43-53.Google Scholar
Grünbaum, A. (1963). Philosophical Problems of Space and Time. New York: Alfred Knopf.Google Scholar
Grünbaum, A. (1973). Philosophical Problems of Space and Time. 2nd enlarged ed. (Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science. Volume XII. Edited by Cohen, R.S. and Wartofsky, Marx.) Dordrecht: Reidel.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holton, G. (1960). “On the Origins of the Special Theory of Relativity.” American Journal of Physics 28: 627-636. (As reprinted in Holton, (1973). Pages 165-183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holton, G. (1967-1968). “Influences on Einstein's Early Work.” The American Scholar 37: 59-79. (As reprinted in Holton (1973). Pages 197-217.Google Scholar
Holton, G. (1969). “Einstein, Michelson, and the ‘Crucial’ Experiment.” Isis 60: 133-197. (As reprinted in Holton (1973). Pages 261-352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holton, G. (1973). Thematic Origins of Scientific Thought: Kepler to Einstein. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Holton, G. (1980). “Einstein's Scientific Program: The Formative Years.” In Some Strangeness in the Proportion. Edited by Woolf, Harry. Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley. Pages 49-65.Google Scholar
Klein, M.J. (1967). “Thermodynamics in Einstein's Thought.” Science 157: 509-516.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lorentz, H.A. (1895). Versuch einer Theorie der elektrischen und optischen Erscheinungen in bewegten Körpern. Leiden:Brill.Google Scholar
Lorentz, H.A. (1904). “Electromagnetic Phenomena in a System Moving with any Velocity Less than that of Light.” Proceedings of the Academy of Solences of Amsterdam 6: 809-831. (As reprinted in Lorentz, H.A. et al. The Principle of Relativity: A Collection of Original Memoirs on the Special and General Theories of Relativity. New York: Dover, 1952. Pages 11-34.Google Scholar
Miller, A.I. (1975). “Albert Einstein and Max Wertheimer: A Gestalt Psychologist's View of the Genesis of Special Relativity.” History of Science 13; 75-103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, A.I. (1981). Albert Einstein's Special Theory of Relativity: Emergence (1905) and Early Interpretation (1905-1911) Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
Polanyi, M. (1958). Personal Knowledge. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Polanyi, M. (1961). “Notes on Professor Grünbaum's Observations.” In Current Issues in the Philosophy of Science. Edited by Feigl, Herbert and Maxwell, Grover. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston. Pages 53-55.Google Scholar
Reiser, A. (1930). Albert Einstein: A Biographical Portrait. New York: Albert and Charles Boni.Google Scholar
Seelig, C. (1954). Albert Einstein: Eine dokumentarische Biographie. Zürich: Europa-Verlag. (As reprinted as Albert Einstein: A Documentary Biography, (trans.) Savill, Mervyn. London: Staples, 1956.Google Scholar
Shankland, R.S. (1963). “Conversations with Albert Einstein.” American Journal of Physics 31: 47-57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stachel, J. (1981). “Einstein and Michelson: The Context of Discovery and the Context of Justification.” . Prepared for the Michelson Colloquium, Potsdam - Caputh, April 27-30, 1981, Mimeo.Google Scholar
Wertheimer, M. (1945). Productive Thinking. New York: Harper.Google Scholar