Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T20:15:02.215Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Means/Ends and the Nature of Engineering

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 March 2022

Michael Hodges
Michael Hodges*
Affiliation:
Vanderbilt University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

One of the most interesting and influential views in Aristotle's work is his distinction between the practical life and the contemplative life. The division is based on two important claims. The first is a philosophical psychology which involves a hierarchy of human faculties, the highest of which is the intellect. The second is a distinction between two kinds of human doing. One sort of doing is essentially aimed at ends for the sake of which it is undertaken and the other is a doing pursued for its own sake, merely as an exercise of appropriate faculties, skills, or capacities. The hierarchy of faculties and division of human doings grounds Aristotle's view that the exercise of intellect, what he calls “contemplation”, is the highest form of human activity.

Type
Part VIII. Philosophy, Engineering and Society
Information
PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association , Volume 1980 , Issue 2: Volume Two: Symposia and Invited Papers 1980 , 1980 , pp. 456 - 463
Copyright
Copyright © 1981 by the Philosophy of Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anonymous. (1970). “Pure Technology.” Technology Review 70: 38-45. (As Reprinted in Teich, A. (ed.) Technology and Man's Future. New York: St. Martin's Press, 1972. Pages 51-61.)Google Scholar
, Aristotle Nicomaohean Ethics. (trans.)Ostwald, Martin. New York: The Library of Liberal Arts, 1962.Google Scholar
Barzun, J. (1959). The House of Intellect Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Feibleman, J.K. (1961). “Pure Science, Applied Science, and Technology: An Attempt at Definitions.” Technology and Culture 2: 305-317. (As Reprinted in Mitcham and Mackey (1972). Pages 33-41.)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Florman, S.C. (1976). The Existential Pleasures of Engineering. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
Mitcham, C. and Mackey, R. (eds.). (1972). Philosophy and Technology: Readings in the Philosophical Problems of Technology. New York: The Free PressGoogle Scholar
Mumford, L., (1962). “Technics and The Nature of Man.” In Knowledge Among Men. Edited by Oehser, Paul H.. New York: Simon and Schuster. Pages 174-182. (As Reprinted in Mitcham and Mackey (1972). Pages 77-85.)Google Scholar