Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-f46jp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-12T23:01:45.519Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Large-Scale Biological Entities and the Evolutionary Process

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2022

Nile Eldredge
Nile Eldredge*
Affiliation:
The American Museum of Natural History
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

I wish to pose an instance in which philosophy has made an explicit and I feel, very useful contribution to the resolution of a set of scientific problems. Some of this work has been done by philosophers with a biological bent, and some by biologists with a philosophical bent. Whether the upshot is philosophy of biology, I cannot say. But recent conceptual advances in the ontology of what we might call “large biological things” holds a number of practical consequences for macroevolutionary theory.

Let us begin by asking what is “macroevolution” and, consequently, macroevolutionary theory? The “Modern Synthesis“, of course, maintains thatvthe neo-Darwinian paradigm (i.e., natural selection united with a’ coherent theory of the principles of heredity) is both necessary and sufficient to account for most evolutionary phenomena, including macroevolution.

Type
Part XIII. Invited Paper: Philosophy of Biology
Information
PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association , Volume 1984 , Issue 2: Volume Two: Symposia and Invited Papers 1984 , 1984 , pp. 550 - 566
Copyright
Copyright © 1985 by the Philosophy of Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Book, W.J (1965). “The Role of Adaptive Mechanisms in the Origin of Higher Levels of Organization.” Systematic Zoology 14: 272-287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Book, W.J (1979). “The synthetic explanation of macroevolutionary change — a reductionistic approach.” Bulletin of the Carnegie Museum of Natural History 13: 20-69.Google Scholar
Cain, A.J (1954). Animal Species and Their Evolution. London: Hutchinson and Company, Limited.Google Scholar
Damuth, J (1985). “Selection Among ‘Species': A Formulation in Terms of Natural Functional Units.” Evolution 39: 1132-1146.Google Scholar
Dobzhansky, Th (1937). Genetics and the Origin of Species. New York: Columbia University Press. (As reprinted New York: Columbia University Press, 1982.Google Scholar
Dobzhansky, Th (1941). Genetics and the Origin of Species. 2nd ed. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Dobzhansky, Th (1951). Genetics and the Origin of Species. 3rd ed. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Eldredge, N and Gould, S.J (1972). “Punctuated Equilibria: An Alternative to Phyletic Gradualism.” In Models in Paleobiology. Edited by T.J.M. Schopf. San Francisco:: Freeman, Cooper and Company. Pages 82-115.Google Scholar
Eldredge, N and Gould, S.J and Cracraft, J (1980). Phylogenetic Patterns and the Evolutionary Process. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Eldredge, N and Gould, S.J (1982). “Phenomenological Levels and Evolutionary Rates.” Systematic Zoology 31: 338-347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eldredge, N and Gould, S.J and Salthe, S.N (1984). “Hierarchy and Evolution.” Oxford Surveys in Evolutionary Biology 1: 182-206 .Google Scholar
Eldredge, N and Gould, S.J (1985). The Integration of Evolutionary Theory. New York and London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ghiselin, M (1974). “A Radical Solution to the Species Problem.” Systematic Zoology 23: 536-544.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gould, S.J (1980). “G.G. Simpson, Paleontology, and the Modern Synthesis.” In The Evolutionary Synthesis. Perspectives on the Unification of Biology. Edited by Mayr, E and Provine, H.B. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. Pages 153-172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gould, S.J and Vrba, E.S (1982). “Exaptation — a missing term in the science of form.” Paleobiology 8: 4-15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hull, D.L (1976). “Are Species Really Individuals?” Systematic Zoology 25: 174-191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hull, D.L (1980). “Individuality and Selection.” Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 11: 311-332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hayrt, E (1942). Systematics and the Origin of Species. New York: Columbia University Press. (As reprinted New York: Columbia University Press, 1982.Google Scholar
Hayrt, E (1980a). “Prologue: Some Thoughts on the History of the Evolutionary Synthesis.” In The Evolutionary Synthesis. Perspectives on the Unification of Biology. Edited by Mayr, E and Provine, H.B. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. Pages 1-48.Google Scholar
Hayrt, E (1980b). “Biographical essays: G.G. Simpson.” In The Evolutionary Synthesis. Perspectives on the Unification of Biology. Edited by Mayr, E and Provine, H.B. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. Pages 452-463.Google Scholar
Paterson, H.E.H (1978). “More Evidence Against Speciation by Reinforcement.” South African Journal of Science 74: 369-371.Google Scholar
Rensch, B (1947). Neuere Probleme der Abstammungslehre. Stuttgart: Ferdinard Enke.Google Scholar
Rensch, B (1960). Evolution Above the Species Level. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Simpson, G.G (1944). Tempo and Mode in Evolution. New York: Columbia University Press. (As reprinted New York: Columbia University Press, 1984.Google Scholar
Simpson, G.G (1959). “The Nature and Origin of Supraspecific Taxa.” Cold Soring Harbor Symposia on Quantitative Biology 24: 255-271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simpson, G.G (1961). Principles of Animal Taxonomy. New York: Columbia University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, P (1983). “Tempo and Mode in Evolution: Punctuated Equilibrium and the Modern Synthetic Theory.” Philosophy of Science 50: 432-452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vrba, E.S (1980). “Evolution, Species and Fossils: How Does Life Evolve?” South African Journal of Science 76: 61-84.Google Scholar
Vrba, E.S (1984). “Evolutionary Pattern and Process in the Sister-Group Alcelaphini-Aepycerotini (Mammalia: Bovidae).” In Living Fossils. Edited by Eldredge, N and Stanley, S.M. New York: Springer Verlag. Pages 62-79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vrba, E.S and Eldredge, N (1984). “Individuals, hierarchies and processes: towards a more complete evolutionary theory.” Paleobiology 10: 146-171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wiley, E.O (1979). “Ancestors, Species and Cladograms — Remarks on the Symposium.” In Phylogenetic Analysis and Paleontology. Edited by Cracraft, J and Eldredge, N. New York: Columbia University Press. Pages 211-225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, G.C (1966). Adaptation and Natural Selection. A Critique of Some Current Evolutionary Thought. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Wright, S (1967). “Comments on the Preliminary Working Papers of Eden and Haddington.” In Mathematical Challenges to the Neo-Darwinian Interpretation of Evolution. Edited by Moorehead, P.S and Kaplan, M.M. Philadelphia: Wistar Institute Press. Pages 117-120.Google Scholar