Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T18:10:00.419Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Jarrett’s Locality Condition and Causal Paradox

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 January 2023

Allen Stairs
Allen Stairs*
Affiliation:
University of Maryland
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

In this paper, I want to present a family of results that may seem to add up to a new proof of the impossibility of hidden variables. In fact, I very much doubt that that’s really what really emerges, but I think the results are nonetheless interesting because they help to sharpen the discussion of Jon Jarrett’s very useful decompostion theorem, in particular, of the condition he calls locality. Jarrett (1984) and Ballentine and Jarrett (1987) have suggested that the so-called condition of locality is the one that provides the conceptual link between hidden variable theories and relativity: if locality is violated, so is relativity. On the other hand, a theory may violate the condition Jarrett calls completeness without running afoul of relativity. Now I agree with Jarrett and Ballentine about completeness, but I strongly suspect that we have quite a way to go before we really understand what would be involved in a violation of locality.

Type
Part X. Causation
Information
PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association , Volume 1988 , Issue 1: Volume One: Contributed Papers 1988 , 1988 , pp. 318 - 325
Copyright
Copyright © Philosophy of Science Association 1988

References

Ballentine, L.E. and Jarrett, Jon P. (1987). “Bell’s Theorem: Does Quantum Mechanics Contradict Relativity?”, American Journal of Physics 55: 696–707.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heywood, P. and Redhead, M.L.G. (1983). “Nonlocality and the Kochen and Specker Paradox”, Foundations of Physics 13: 481–498.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horwich, P. (1987) Asymmetries in Time Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Jarrett, J.P. (1984). “On the Physical Significance of the Locality Condition in the Bell Argument”, Nous 18: 569–589.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, D. (1976). “The Paradoxes of Time Travel”, American Philosophical Quarterly 13: 145–152.Google Scholar
Shimony, A. (1984). “Contextual Hidden Variables and Bell’s Inequalities”, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 35: 25–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stairs, A. (1988). “Locality and Causal Paradoxes”, (forthcoming).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Fraassen, B.C. (1973). “Semantic Analysis of Quantum Logic”. In Hooker, C.A. (ed.), Contemporary Research in the Foundations of Quantum Mechanics. Dordrecht: Reidel, pp. 80–113.Google Scholar