Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-s22k5 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-13T03:58:54.076Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

How the Models of Chemistry Vie

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 January 2023

James R. Hofmann
James R. Hofmann*
Affiliation:
California State University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Recent work by historians and philosophers has called attention to the complexity of modern experimental physics and its intricate relation to interpretive and explanatory theory (Franklin 1987, Hacking 1983, Galison 1987 and 1989, Pickering 1984 and 1987). One point of general agreement has been that the contexts of discovery and justification often significantly overlap and do not uniformly correlate with experiment and theory. Instead, intended applications, instrumentation, experiment, phenomenological description, explicative models, and explanatory theory all act both as incentives and as constraints during the production of scientific knowledge. The present paper investigates how one node of this network operates in the domain of solid state physics and chemistry. In particular, a case study analysis of how models function in transition metal oxide research provides ample support for several conclusions.

First, it must be emphasized that the term “theory” can have misleading connotations in this domain if it is allowed to imply a single and foundational level of explanatory generality.

Type
Part VII. Realism
Information
PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association , Volume 1990 , Issue 1: Volume One: Contributed Papers 1990 , 1990 , pp. 405 - 419
Copyright
Copyright © Philosophy of Science Association 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adler, D. (1968), “Insulating and Metallic States in Transition Metal Oxides”, Solid State Physics 21: 1–113.Google Scholar
Bantz, D.A. (1980), “The Structure of Discovery: Evolution of Structural Accounts of Chemical Bonding”, in Nickles, T. (ed.), Scientific Discovery: Case Studies. Dordrecht: D. Reidel Publishing Company, pp. 291–329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bierlein, J.A. (1955), “A Phenomenological Theory of Soret Diffusion”, Journal of Chemical Physics 23: 10–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bogen, J. and Woodward, J. (1988), “Saving the Phenomena”, The Philosophical Review 97: 303–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cartwright, N. (1983), How the Laws of Physics Lie. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Boer, J.H. and Verwey, E.J.W. (1937), “Semi-Conductors with Partially and with Completely Filled 3d-Lattice Bands”, Proceedings of the Physical Society 49 (extra part): 59–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Franklin, A. (1987), “Experiment and the Development of the Theory of Weak Interactions: Fermi’s Theory”, in Fine, A. and Machamer, P. (eds.), PSA 1986 Proceedings, vol. 2. East Lansing: Philosophy of Science Association, pp. 163–179.Google Scholar
Galison, P. (1987), How Experiments End. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Galison, P. (1989), “Multiple Constraints, Simultaneous Solutions”, in Fine, A. and Leplin, J. (eds.), PSA 1988 Proceedings, vol. 2. East Lansing: Philosophy of Science Association, pp. 157–163.Google Scholar
Hacking, I. (1983), Representing and Intervening. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heikes, R.R. and Johnston, W.D. (1957), “Mechanism of Conduction in Li-Substituted Transition Metal Oxides”, Journal of Chemical Physics 26: 582–587.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heitler, W. (1967), “Quantum Chemistry: The Early Period”, International Journal of Quantum Chemistry 1: 13–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hubbard, J. (1963), “Electron Correlations in Narrow Energy Bands”, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London A276: 238–257.Google Scholar
Ksendzov, Ya.M., Ansel’m, L.N., Vasil’eva, L.L., and Latysheva, V.M. (1963), “Investigation of the Carrier Mobility in NiO with Li Impurity”, Soviet Physics - Solid State 5: 1116–1123.Google Scholar
Laymon, R.(1989), “Cartwright and the Lying Laws of Physics”, Journal of Philosophy 86: 353–372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lowdin, P. O.(1967), “Nature of Quantum Chemistry”, International Journal of Quantum Chemistry 1: 7–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morin, F. J.(1958), “Oxides of the 3-d Transition Metals”, Bell System Technical Journal 37: 1047–1084.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mott, N. (1937), “Discussion of the Paper by De Boer and Verwey”, Proceedings of the Physical Society 49 (extra part): 72–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mott, N. (1941), “Application of Atomic Theory to Solids”, Nature 147: 623–624.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mott, N. (1949), “The Basis of the Electron Theory of Metals, with Special Reference to the Transition Metals”, Proceedings of the Physical Society 62: 416–422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mott, N. (1951), “Semi-conductors”, in Henisch, H.K. (ed.), Semi-Conducting Materials. London: Butterworths Scientific Publications, pp. 1–7.Google Scholar
Mott, N. (1952), “Recent Advances in the Electron Theory of Metals”, Progress in Metal Physics 3: 76–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mott, N. (1956), “On the Transition to Metallic Conduction in Semiconductors”, Canadian Journal of Physics 34: 1356–1368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mott, N. (1958), “The Transition from the Metallic to the Non-Metallic State”, Del Nuovo Cimento 7 (supplement): 312–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mott, N. (1984), “Metals, non-metals and metal-non-metal transitions: some recollections”, Reports on Progress in Physics 47: 909–923.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mott, N. F. and Gurney, R. W. (1948), Electronic Processes in Ionic Crystals. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Mulliken, R. S. (1968), “Spectroscopy, Quantum Chemistry and Molecular Physics”, Physics Today 52: 52–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pickering, A. (1984), “Against Putting the Phenomena First: The Discovery of the Weak Neutral Current”, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 15: 85–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pickering, A. (1987), “Against Correspondence: A Constructivist View of Experiment and the Real”, in Fine, A. and Machamer, P. (eds.), PSA 1986 Proceedings, vol. 2. East Lansing: Philosophy of Science Association; pp. 196–206.Google Scholar
Schopman, J. (1983), “The Philips’ Contribution to Theory and Application of Semiconducting Oxides (1935-1950)”, Janus 70: 129–145.Google Scholar
Schopman, J. (1988), “Industrious Science: Semiconductor Research at the N.V. Philips’ Gloeilampenfabrieken, 1930-1957”, Historical Studies in the Physical Sciences 19: 137–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seitz, F. (1940), The Modern Theory of Solids. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Slater, J. C. (1959), “Band Theory”, Journal of the Physics and Chemistry of Solids 8: 21–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slater, J. C. (1967), “The Current State of Solid-State and Molecular Theory”, International Journal of Quantum Chemistry 1: 37–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slater, J. C. (1968), “Quantum Physics in America Between the Wars”, Physics Today 21(1): 43–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Switendick, A.C. (1963), “Energy Bands in Nickel Oxide by the Augmented Plane-Wave Method” (abstract), Bulletin of the American Physical Society 8: 221.Google Scholar
Verwey, E.J.W. (1951), “Oxidic Semi-conductors”, in Henisch, H.K. (ed.), SemiConducting Materials. London: Butterworths Scientific Publications, pp. 151–161.Google Scholar
Verwey, E.J.W., Haaijman, P.W., Romeijn, F.C. and van Oosterhout, G.W. (1950), “Controlled-Valency Semiconductors”, Philips Research Reports 5: 173–187.Google Scholar
Woodward, J. (1989), “Data and Phenomena”, Synthese 79: 393–472.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yamashito, J. (1963), “Electronic Structure of TiO and NiO”, Journal of the Physical Society of Japan 18: 1010–1016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yamashito, J. and Kurosawa, T. (1960), “Heitler-London Approach to Electrical Conductivity and Application to d-Electron Conductions”, Journal of the Physical Society of Japan 15: 802–821.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zener, C. (1959), “D-Band and Mixed-Valency Semiconductors”, Journal of the Physics and Chemistry of Solids 8: 26–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhuze, V. P. and Shelykh, A. I. (1963), “Hall Effect in Nickel Oxide”, Soviet Physics Solid State 5: 1278–1280.Google Scholar