Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T17:49:50.076Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Historiography of Special Relativity: Comments on the Papers by John Earman, Clark Glymour, and Robert Rynasiewicz and by Arthur Miller

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2022

Kenneth F. Schaffner
Kenneth F. Schaffner*
Affiliation:
University of Pittsburgh
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Part VIII. Einstein's Discovery/Invention Of Special Relativity
Information
PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association , Volume 1982 , Issue 2: Volume Two: Symposia and Invited Papers 1982 , 1982 , pp. 417 - 428
Copyright
Copyright © 1983 Philosophy of Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Cassirer, E. (1921). Zur Einstelnschen Relativitätstheorie. Berlin: Bruno Cassirer Verlag.Google Scholar
Earman, J.; Glymour, C. and Rynasiewicz, R. (unpublished). “Reconsidering the Origins of Special Relativity.” January 1983.Google Scholar
Einstein, A. (1905). “Zur Elektrodynamik bewegter Korper.” Anrialen der Physik 17: 891-921. (As reprinted as “On the Electrodynamics of Moving Bodies.” In Lorentz, H.A. et al. The Principle of Relativity: A Collection of Original Memoirs on the Special and General Theories of Relativity, (trans.) Perrett, W.and Jeffery, G.B.. New York: Dover, ‘1952. Pages 37-65. But see Miller (1981) pages 391-415 for a critique of this widely used translation and Miller's own new translation.Google Scholar
Einstein, A. (1917). Über die spezielle und die allgemeine Relativitätstheorie: Gemeinverständich. Braunschweig: F. Vieweg. (As reprinted as Relativity: The Special and General Theory. (trans.) Lawson, R.W.. New York: Crown, 1961. (Preface is dated December 1916 by Einstein.Google Scholar
Einstein, A. (1919). “What is the Theory of Relativity?” The London Times November 28, 1919. (As reprinted in The World As I See It. New York: Covici-Friede, 1934. Pages 73-74.Google Scholar
Einstein, A. (1922). “How I Created the Theory of Relativity.” (As printed in Physics Today (1982) 35(8): 45-47. (trans.) Y.A. Ono.) (This is the “Kyoto Address”— see Note 1 for a discussion.Google Scholar
Einstein, A. (1949). “Autobiographical Notes.” In Albert Einstein: Philosopher-Scientist. Volume One. (Library of Living Philosophers. Volume VII.) Edited by P.A. Schilpp. Evanston: The Library of Living Philosophers. Pages 2-94.Google Scholar
Frank, P. (1949). Modern Science and Its Philosophy. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Grünbaum, A. (1973). Philosophical Problems of Space and Time. 2nd enlarged edition. (Boston Studies in the Philosophy of-Science, Volume XII. Edited by Cohen, R.S. and Wartofsky, Marx.) Dordrecht-Holland: Reidel.Google Scholar
Helmholtz, H. von. (1894). “Preface” to Hertz (1894). (no pagination).Google Scholar
Hertz, H. (1894). Die Prinzipien der Mechanik in neuen zusammenhange dargestellt, Gesammelte Werke, bd. III.) Edited by Lenard, P.. Leipzig: J.A. Barth. (As reprinted as The Principles of Mechanics, (trans.) Jones, D.E. and Walley, J.T.. New York: Dover, 1956.)Google Scholar
Holton, G. (1968). “Mach, Einstein, and the Search for Reality.” Daedalus 97: 636-673. (As reprinted in Holton (1973). Pages 219-259.Google Scholar
Holton, G. (1969). “Einstein, Michelson, and the ‘Crucial’ Experiment.” Isis 60: 133-197. (As reprinted in Holton (1973). Pages 261-352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holton, G. (1973). Thematic Origins of Scientific Thought: Kepler to Einstein. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Lorentz, H.A. (1904). “Electromagnetic Phenomena in a System Moving with Any Velocity Less Than That of Light.” Proceedings of the Academy of Sciences of Amsterdam 6: 809-831. (As reprinted in Lorentz, H.A. et al. The Principle of Relativity; A Collection of Original Memoirs on the Special and General Theories of Relativity. New York: Dover, 1952. Pages 11-34.) (For the full version of this 1904 essay, see Lorentz's (1935-39) Collected Papers, Volume 5. The Hague: Nijhoff. Pages 172-197.Google Scholar
Lorentz, H.A. (1909 and 1915). The Theory of Electrons. New York: Dover. (The Dover edition is the second edition, but the differences between the 1909 and 1915 are clearly labeled by Lorentz and conform to the 1909 edition as published by Columbia university Press.Google Scholar
Mach, E. (1883). Die Mechanik in ihrer Entwickelung historischkritisch dargestellt. Leipzig: F.A. Brockhaus. (As reprinted from the 9th German edition as The Science of Mechanics: A Critical and Historical Account of Its Development, (trans.) McCormack, T.J.. La Salle, IL: Open Court, 1960.Google Scholar
Mach, E. (1896). Die PrinciPien der Wärmelehre. Historisch-kritisch entwickelt. Leipzig: Barth. (As reprinted as “Critique of the Concept of Temperature.” (trans.) McCormack, T.J.. The Open Court (1903) 17: 95-103, 154-161.Google Scholar
Miller, A. (1975). “Albert Einstein and Max Wertheimer: A Gestalt Psychologist's View of the Genesis of Special Relativity.” History of Science 13: 75-103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, A. (1981). Albert Einstein's Special Theory of Relativity: Emergence 1905) and Early Interpretation ( 1905-1911). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
Pais, A. (1982). “Subtle is the Lord”: The Science and Life of Albert Einstein. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Poincaré, H. (1902). La Science et l'Hypothese. Paris: Flammarion. (As reprinted as Science and Hypothesis, (trans.) Greenstreet, W.J.. New York: Dover, 1952.)Google Scholar
Schaffner, K.F. (1969). “The Lorentz Electron Theory of Relativity.” American Journal of Physics 37: 498-513.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schaffner, K.F. (1972). Nineteenth-Century Aether Theories. Oxford: Pergamon Presa.Google Scholar
Schaffner, K.F. (1974). “Einstein Versus Lorentz: Research Programmes and the Logic of Comparative Theory Evaluation.” The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 25: 45-78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schaffner, K.F. (1980). “Discovery in the Biomedical Sciences: Logic or Irrational Intuition.” In Scientific Discovery: Case Studies. Edited by Nickles, Thomas. Dordrecht-Holland: Reidel. Pages 171-205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wertheimer, M. (1959). Productive Thinking. New York: Harper.Google Scholar