Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T19:17:31.486Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Four Basic Concepts of Medical Science

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2022

Caroline Whitbeck
Caroline Whitbeck*
Affiliation:
Institute for the Medical Humanities University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

It might be thought that the basic concept in medical science is that of health. However, as it turns out, medicine has little or nothing to say about health. (This is less true of some of the other health sciences and health professions, notably nursing and public health.) Instead it is diseases, injuries, impairments, and, to a lesser extent, symptoms which are the focus of concern in medicine. It is a generally recognized and frequently bemoaned fact that in this country, contemporary medicine and medical education largely ignore, not only the promotion of health, but even the prevention of disease and injury. (Medical educators are among those most acutely aware of this situation.) Instead, medicine is principally concerned with the diagnosis and treatment of medical crisis.

It is small wonder that in explicating the concept of health as it is found in the theories which inform the practice of medicine, Boorse arrives at a negative notion, viz., health as the absence of disease and injury.

Type
Part VI. Aspects of Rationality
Information
PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association , Volume 1978 , Issue 1: Volume One: Contributed Papers 1978 , 1978 , pp. 210 - 222
Copyright
Copyright © 1978 by the Philosophy of Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

1

I am indebted to Joseph Margolis for some very useful criticisms of an earlier draft of this paper.

References

Boorse, Christopher. “Health as a Theoretical Concept.” Philosophy of Science 44(1977): 542–573.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boorse, Christopher. “On the Distinction Between Disease and Illness.” Philosophy and Public Affairs 5(1975): 49–68.Google Scholar
Commission on Professional and Hospital Activities. Hospital Adaptation of ICDA (H-ICDA), 2nd. ed. Arbor, Ann, Michigan: CPHA, 1973.Google Scholar
Engelhardt, H. Tristram Jr., “The Concepts of Health and Disease.” Evaluation and Explanation in the Biomedical Sciences. Edited by Engelhardt, and Spicker, . Dordrecht: D. Reidel, 1975.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Engelhardt, H. Tristram Jr. “Is There a Philosophy of Medicine?” In PSA 1976, Volume 2. Edited by Suppe, F. and Asquith, P.D. East Lansing: Philosophy of Science Association, 1977. Pages 94–108.Google Scholar
Engelhardt, H. Tristram Jr. “The Disease of Masturbation: Values and the Concept of Disease.” Bulletin of the History of Medicine 48(1974): 234–238.Google ScholarPubMed
Erde, Edmund. “Mind-Body and Malady.” The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 2(1977): 177–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fabrega, Horacio. Disease and Social Behavior. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1974.Google Scholar
Fingarette, Herbert. The Self in Transformation: Psychoanalysis, Philosophy, & the Life of the Spirit. New York: Basic Books, 1963.Google Scholar
Garvin, Robert and Whitbeck, Caroline. “Toward a Complete Theory of Agency: Acting on the Self.” Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
Margolis, Joseph. “The Concept of Disease.” Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 1 (1976): 238–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parsons, Talcott. The Social System. New York: Free Press, 1951.Google Scholar
Sidel, Ruth and Sidel, Victor W. A Healthy State: An International Perspective on the Crisis in United States Medical Care. New York: Pantheon Books, 1977.Google Scholar
Stedman's Medical Dictionary. 22nd ed. Baltimore: Williams and Wilkins, 1972.Google Scholar
Susser, Mervyn. Causal Thinking in the Health Sciences. New York: Oxford University Press, 1973.Google Scholar
Whitbeck, Caroline. “Causation in Medicine: The Disease Entity Model.” Philosophy of Science 4(1977): 619–637.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whitbeck, Caroline. “The Relevance of the Philosophy of Medicine for Philosophy of Science.” In PSA 1976, Volume 2. Edited by Suppe, F. and Asquith, P.D.. East Lansing: Philosophy of Science Association, 1977. Pages 123–135.Google Scholar
Whitbeck, Caroline. “Health and Agents.” Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar