Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T18:33:45.701Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Elementarily and Anti-Matter in Contemporary Physics: Comments on Michael D. Resnik’s “Between Mathematics and Physics”

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 January 2023

Susan C. Hale*
Affiliation:
California State University, Northridge
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Part IX. Mathematical and Physical Objects
Copyright
Copyright © Philosophy of Science Association 1991

Footnotes

1

I would like to thank Michael D. Resnik, Mark Risjord, and Richard Zaffron for their helpful comments while I was initially preparing this commentary. Many participants at the PSA meeting raised good criticisms, but I would especially to thank Steven French and Hartry Field for their criticisms.

References

Boscovich, R.J. (1966), A Theory of Natural Philosophy, translated by Child, J.M.. Cambridge, Massachusetts: M.I.T. Press.Google Scholar
Cartwright, N. (1987), “Max Born and the Reality of Quantum Probabilities”, in The Probabilistic Revolution, Vol. II, Kruger, L., Gigerenzer, G., and Morgan, M. (eds.). Cambridge, Massachusetts: M.I.T. Press.Google Scholar
Gjertsen, D. (1989), Science and Philosophy: Past and present. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
Heisenberg, W. (1983), Encounters with Einstein. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Resnik, M.D. (1991), “Between Mathematics and Physics” this volume.Google Scholar