Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-cphqk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-13T22:49:55.519Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Descartes and Method in 1637

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2022

Daniel Garber
Daniel Garber*
Affiliation:
University of Chicago
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The Discours de la Méthode and the three essays that were published with it, the Dioptrique, the Météores, and the Géometrie make up a very curious book. The very title page emphasizes the preliminary discourse, and that discourse, the Discours de la Méthode, emphasizes method, the importance that method had for Descartes in making the discoveries he made, the importance that the method Descartes claims to have found will have for the progress of the sciences and for the benefit of humankind as whole. Descartes is not, of course, telling us that we are obligated to follow his method; the Discours is, after all, proposed “as a story, or, if you prefer, as a fable.” (AT VI 4). But Descartes expects that we will all see the light, the light of reason, of course, and follow his example.

Type
Part VIII. Descartes
Information
PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association , Volume 1988 , Issue 2: Volume Two: Symposia and Invited Papers 1988 , 1988 , pp. 225 - 236
Copyright
Copyright © 1989 by the Philosophy of Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adam, C. and Tannery, P. (eds.) (1965-1975), Oeuvres de Descartes (nouvelle présentation). Paris: J. Vrin.Google Scholar
Beck, L.J. (1952), The Method of Descartes. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Costabel, P. (1982), Démarches originales de Descartes savante. Paris: J. Vrin.Google Scholar
Garber, D. (1986), “Semel in Vita: the Scientific Background to Descartes's Meditations”, in Rorty, A. (ed.), Essays on Descartes’ Meditations. Los Angeles and Berkeley: University of California Press, 1980.Google Scholar
Gilson, E. (1967), René Descartes: Discours de la méthode, texte et commentaire, 4me éd. Paris: J. Vrin.Google Scholar
Gouhier, H. (1958), Les premiéres pensées de Descartes. Paris: J. Vrin.Google Scholar
Rodis-Lewis, G. (1971), L'oeuvre de Descartes. Paris: J. Vrin.Google Scholar
Schouls, Peter (1980), The Imposition of Method. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Schuster, J.A. (1980) “Descartes’ Mathesis Universalis, 1619-28,” in Gaukroger, S. (ed.), Descartes: Philosophy, Mathematics and Physics. Sussex: the Harvester Press, 1980.Google Scholar
Serrus, C. (1933), La méthode de Descartes et son application à la métaphysique. Paris: Librarie Félix Alcan.Google Scholar
Weber, J.-P. (1964), La constitution du texte des Regulae. Paris: Société d'édition d'enseignement supérieur.Google Scholar