Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T06:36:11.760Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A Defense of a Non-Computational, Interactive Model of Visual Observation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 January 2023

Bonnie Tamarkin Paller*
Affiliation:
California State University-Northridge
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

In a recent paper1 I argued that observation can be thought of as the result of a properly composed and functioning observation system. In brief, such a system must be composed of a source object and one or more devices which interact with a receptor. If we think of observation as the result of interaction among components are differing functions, we can approach the problem of describing human sense perception as that of describing one type of observation, differentiated from other types by the organic and species specific nature of the receptor devices. Receptor devices are typed by their specific range of sensitivity, which is best thought of as a limit on the type of devices with which the receiver can interact. One consequence of this view is that observation can be achieved in all sorts of ways by all sorts of organic and non-organic systems as long as they satisfy functional conditions.

Type
Part V. Perception and Psychology
Copyright
Copyright © Philosophy of Science Association 1988

References

Falk, D, Brill, D. and Stork, D (1986). Seeing The Light. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Fodor, J. and Pylyshyn, Z. (1981). “How Direct is Visual Perception?: Some Reflections on Gibson’s ‘Ecological Approach’.Cognition 9: 139196.10.1016/0010-0277(81)90009-3CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gibson, J.J. (1979). An Ecological Approach to Visual Perception. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
Paller, B. (forthcoming). “Visual Perception, Observation Systems and Empiricism.” Philosophical Studies.Google Scholar
Pylyshyn, Z. (1984). Computation and Cognition. Cambridge: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Searle, J. (1984). Minds, Brains and Science. London: BBC.Google Scholar