Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T19:20:41.037Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Decision Theory and the Rationality of Ends

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2022

Ilmar Waldner*
Affiliation:
University of Maryland

Extract

One of the more important directions in which work in decision theory is moving is towards the consideration of possible norms not only upon the choices of actions but also upon preferences among the outcomes. There is beginning to be felt a need to explore rationality conditions upon desires, or goals, or preferences, in the same way that rationality conditions upon beliefs and upon choices of actions have been explored. I have suggested on another occasion that there are also reasons to explore the possibility of norms on the processes of planning, design of alternatives, and adaptation. I will not be dealing with these latter issues in this paper, however. Neither do I want now to discuss at length the reasons for incorporating norms on goals, etc., into a decision theory. Yet perhaps I need to motivate the project somewhat at the outset.

Type
Part VII. Recent Developments in Rational Decision Theory
Copyright
Copyright © 1977 by the Philosophy of Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

[1] Brandt, R.Rational Desires.” Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association 43(1969-70): 4364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[2] Braybrooke, D.From Economics to Aesthetics: The Rectification of Preferences.” Nous VIII(1974): 1324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[3] Boles, R.N. What Color is Your Parachute? A Practical Manual for Job Hunters arid Career Changers. Berkeley: Ten Speed Press, 1976.Google Scholar
[4] Crystal, J.C. and Boles, R.N. Where Do I Go From Here With My Life?. New York: Seaburg Press, 1974.Google Scholar
[5] Drucker, P.F. Management: Tasks, Responsibilities, Practices. New York: Harper and Row, 1974.Google Scholar
[6] Frankfurt, H.Freedom of the Will and the Concept of a Person.” Journal of Philosophy LXVIII(1971): 520.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[7] Hubbard, L.R. Dianetics: The Modern Science of Mental Health. Los Angeles: The Church of Scientology of California, Publications Organization United States, 1950.Google Scholar
[8] Hubbard, L.R.. Dianetics Today. Los Angeles: The Church of Scientology of California, Publications Organization United States, 1975.Google Scholar
[9] Hubbard, L.R.. The Technical Bulletins of Dianetics and Scientology Volumes I-X. Copenhagen: Scientology Publications, 1976.Google Scholar
[10] Jeffrey, R.Preference Among Preferences.” Journal of Philosophy LXXI(1974): 377391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[11] Maslow, A.H. The Farther Reaches of Human Nature. New York: Viking, 1971.Google Scholar
[12] Rawls, J. A Theory of Justice. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1971CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[13] Rogers, Car R.Towards a Modern Approach to Values: The Valuing Process in the Mature Person.” The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 68(1964): 160167. (As reprinted in Hart, J.T. and Tomlinson, T.H. (eds.). New Directions in Client Centered Therapy. Boston: Houghton Mifflln, 1970. Pages 430-441.)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[14] Stephenson, W.U. The Study Of Behavior. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1953.Google Scholar
[15] Waldner, I.Good Desires.“ In Problems of Choice and Decision. Edited by Black, M.. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Program on Science Technology, 1975. Pages 453481.Google Scholar
[16] Waldner, I.. “Prolegomena to a Theory of Rational Motives.” In Proceedings of the International Colloquium on the Foundations and Applications of Decision Theory. Edited by C. Hooker. Forthcoming.Google Scholar