Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-s22k5 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-12T21:39:33.772Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Conventionality of Slow-Transport Synchrony

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2022

Peter A. Bowman
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The conventionality of distant simultaneity, as maintained by Hans Reichenbach and Adolf Grünbaum, is by now so widely known that it can be stated very briefly. Let us consider two points A and B which are separated from one another in an inertial frame K. For a light signal emitted from A and reflected at B back to A, we compare the time interval for the out-going trip to that for the round trip. This ratio is called ‘epsilon’ (∊). In formulating the special theory of relativity, Einstein effectively took ∊ to be ½; thus, we may use ∊=½ in defining what is now called ‘standard signal synchrony’. Reichenbach views 6 as being restricted only by the causal relations involved in the signaling process.

Type
Contributed Papers: Session III
Information
PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association , Volume 1974 , 1974 , pp. 423 - 434
Copyright
Copyright © 1976 by D. Reidel Publishing Company, Dordrecht-Holland

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

This paper derives from section F of Bowman (1972): it summarizes subsection 2 and follows subsection 5 with only minor changes in the exposition

References

Bowman, P. A.: 1972, ‘Conventionality in Distant Simultaneity: Its History and Its Philosophy’, Ph.D. dissertation, Indiana University.Google Scholar
Bowman, P. A.: 1976, ‘On Conventionality and Simultaneity - Another Reply’, Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, Vol. VIII (ed. by J., Earman and C., Glymour), forthcoming.Google Scholar
Bowman, P. A.: 1976a, ‘The Rejection of Newtonian Simultaneity by Lorentz and Larmor’, forthcoming.Google Scholar
Bowman, P. A.: 1976b, ‘Henri Poincart and the Light Principle’, forthcoming.Google Scholar
Bridgman, P. W.: 1962, A Sophisticate’s Primer of Relativity, Wesleyan Univ. Press, Middletown, Conn.Google Scholar
Earman, J. and Friedman, M.: 1973, ‘The Meaning and Status of Newton’s Law of Inertia and the Nature of Gravitational Forces’, Philosophy of Science 40, 329-359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellis, B. D.: 1963, ‘Universal and Differential Forces’, The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 14, 177-194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellis, B. D.: 1965, ‘The Origin and Nature of Newton’s Laws of Motion’, in Colodny, R. G. (ed.), Beyond the Edge of Certainty, Univ. of Pittsburgh Press, Pittsburgh.Google Scholar
Ellis, B. D.: 1966, Basic Concepts of Measurement, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Ellis, B. D.: 1971, ‘On Conventionality and Simultaneity - A Reply’, Australasian Journal of Philosophy 49, 177-203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellis, B. D. and Bowman, P. A.: 1967, ‘Conventionality in Distant Simultaneity’, Philosophy of Science 34, 116-136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grünbaum, A.: 1969, ‘Simultaneity by Slow Clock Transport in the Special Theory of Relativity’, Philosophy of Science 36, 5-43; reprinted in Grünbaum (1973, pp. 670-708).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grünbaum, A.: 1970, ‘Space, Time and Falsifiability: Introduction and Part A’, Philosophy of Science 37, 469-588; reprinted in Griinbaum (1973, pp. 449-568).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grünbaum, A.: 1973, Philosophical Problems of Space and Time, 2nd ed. (Synthese Library), D. Reidel Publishing Company, Dordrecht and Boston; 1st ed. published 1963.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hunt, I.E. and Suchting, W. A.: 1969, ‘Force and “Natural” Motion’, Philosophy of Science 36, 233-251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lorentz, H. A.: 1937, ‘Versuch einer Theorie der elektrischen und optischen Erscheinungen in bewegten Körper’, in Collected Papers, Vol. V (ed. by P., Zeeman and A. D., Fokker), Martinus Nijhoff, The Hague.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poincaré, H.: 1954, Oeuvres de Henri Poincaré, Vol. IX, Gauthier-Villars, Paris.Google Scholar
Reichenbach, H.: 1958, The Philosophy of Space and Time (translated by M., Reichenbach and J., Freund), Dover Publications, New York; German ed. published 1928.Google Scholar
Reichenbach, H.: 1969, Axiomatization of the Theory of Relativity (translated by M., Reichenbach), University of California Press, Berkeley and Los Angeles; German ed. published 1924.Google Scholar
Schaffner, K. F.: 1969, ‘The Lorentz Electron Theory [and] Relativity’, American Journal of Physics 37, 498-513.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Winnie, J.: 1970, ‘Special Relativity Without One-Way Velocity Assumptions: Parts I and H’, Philosophy of Science 37, 81-99 and 223-238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar