Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-03T00:24:44.945Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Contextualizing Science: From Science Studies to Cultural Studies

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2022

Vassiliki Betty Smocovitis
Vassiliki Betty Smocovitis*
Affiliation:
University of Florida
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

For once I find myself in the unusual position of disagreeing with Joe Rouse for I do not think that science studies can or should be simply “modeled’ after cultural studies as he has suggested. Instead I will argue for a stronger relationship between science studies and cultural studies that follows historically, if not logically from the progression from HPS to science studies and thence to the cultural study of scientific knowledge. The endpoint of the cultural study of scientific knowledge, at least as I will locate it in this paper and elsewhere, for it depends on how one locates the meaning of culture and its study, is a return to the perspective of the scientist having made roughly a 359 degree angle of departure; that one degree more or less gives the critical distance to “defamiliarize the familiar” perspective of the scientist and to “contextualize” scientific practice.

Type
Part XIII. Discourse, Practice, Context: From HPS to Interdisciplinary Science Studies
Information
PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association , Volume 1994 , Issue 2: Volume Two: Symposia and Invited Papers 1994 , 1994 , pp. 402 - 412
Copyright
Copyright © 1995 by the Philosophy of Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

1

I wish to thank N. Doran, M. Futch, R. Hampton, C. Koehler, G. Kroll, M. Lesney, G. Weisel and other students in the “Cultural Study/Cultural History of Scientific Knowledge” at the University of Florida. I wish also to acknowledge the support of the National Science Foundation and the Division of Sponsored Research at the University of Florida. Support for the The New Contextualism: Science as Discourse and Culture was provided by the Dept. of History and the Humanities Council at the University of Florida; the Philosophy and English Departments provided additional sponsorship.

References

Abir-Am, . (1992), “A Historical Ethnography of A Scientific Anniversary,” Social Epistemology 6:323–354.10.1080/02691729208578670CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baker, K.M. (1990), Inventing the French Revolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Biagioli, M. (1993), Galileo, Courtier. The Practice of Science in the Culture of Absolutism. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chatman, S. (1990), “What Can We Learn from Contextualist Narratology?”, Poetics Today 11: 309–328CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chartier, R. (1988). Cultural History. Between Practices and Representations. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Findlen, P. (1990), “Jokes of Nature and Jokes of Knowledge: The Playfulness of Scientific Discourse in Early Modern Europe,” Renaissance Quarterly 43:292–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haraway, D. (1989), Primate Visions. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hunt, L. (ed.). (1989), The New Cultural History, Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Latour, , and Woolgar, S. [1979] (1986), Laboratory Life: The [Social] Construction of Scientific Facts. 2d (revised) ed. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Latour, B. (1987), Science in Action: How to Follow Scientists And Engineers through Society. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
McGuire, J.E. and Melia, T. (1989), “Some cautionary strictures on the writing of rhetoric of science,” Rhetorica 7:87–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pickering, A. (ed.) (1992), Science as Practice and Culture. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.10.7208/chicago/9780226668208.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pickering, A. (forthcoming), The Mangle of Practice.Google Scholar
Rouse, J. (1993), “What Are Cultural Studies of Scientific Knowledge?”, Configurations 1:1–22.10.1353/con.1993.0006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosaldo, R. (1989), Culture and Truth. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Shapin, S. and Schaffer, S. (1985), Leviathan and the Air-Pump. Hobbes, Boyle, and the Experimental Life. Princeton: Princeton University Press,Google Scholar
Shapin, S. (1994), A Social History of Truth. Civility and Science in Seveteenth-Century England. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smocovitis, V.B. (1992) “Unifying Biology: The Evolutionary Synthesis and Evolutionary Biology,” Journal of the History of Biology 25: 1–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Traweek, S. (1988), Beamtimes and Lifetimes. The World of High-Energy Physics. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Tribby, J. (1991), “Cooking with Clio and Cleo: Eloquence and Experiment in Seventeenth Century Florence,” Journal of the History of ideas 52:417–429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tribby, J. (1994), “Club Medici: Natural Experiment and the Imagineering of ‘Tuscany’”, Configurations 2:215–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woolgar, S. (1982), Science: The Very Idea. Chichester, Sussex: Ellis Horwood Ltd.Google Scholar
Wylie, A. (forthcoming). No Return to Innocence: Philosophical Writings in American Archaeology. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar