Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T06:14:38.566Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Comments on Kochen’s Specification of Measurement Interactions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 January 2023

Richard Healey
Richard Healey*
Affiliation:
Darwin College, Cambridge University
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. As you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Part VII. Realism and Quantum Mechanics
Information
PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association , Volume 1978 , Issue 2: Volume Two: Symposia and Invited Papers 1978 , 1978 , pp. 276 - 294
Copyright
Copyright © 1981 Philosophy of Science Association

Footnotes

1

My research has been supported by the Thyssen Foundation, whose generosity permitted me to accept the invitation to comment on the lecture. I have profited from conversations with Nancy Cartwright, William Demopoulos, Hilary Putnam and Abner Shimony, as well as from the views of participants in a seminar at Cambridge University.

*

Kochen’s paper, given at the PSA Meeting and discussed in these comments, was not submitted for publication. Dr. Healey’s comments are reasonably self-contained and were thought to be worth publishing even without the paper on. which the comments are being made.

References

[1] Bell, J.S. “On the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen Paradox.” Physics 1 (1964): 195–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[2] Bub, J. The Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics. (University of Western Ontario Series in Philosophy of Science, Volume 3.) Dordrecht: Reidel, 1974.Google Scholar
[3] Cartwright, N. “A Dilemma for the Traditional Interpretation of Quantum Mixtures.” In PSA 1972. (Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science. Volume XX.) Edited by Schaffner, K. and Cohen, R.S. Dordrecht: Reidel, 1974. Pages 251–258.Google Scholar
[4] Cartwright, N. “The Only Real Probabilities in Quantum Mechanics.” In PSA 1978, Volume 1. Edited by Asquith, P.D. and Hacking, I. East Lansing, Michigan: Philosophy of Science Association, 1978. Pages 54–59.Google Scholar
[5] Dorling, J. “A Proof of the Non-Existence of Partial Hidden Variable Theories.” Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
[6] Einstein, A., Podolsky, B., and Rosen, N. “Can Quantum Mechanical Description of Physical Reality be Considered Complete?” Physical Review 47(1935): 777–780.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[7] Gleason, A.M. “Measures on the Closed Subspaces of a Hilbert Space.” Journal of Mathematics and Mechanics 6(1957): 885–893.Google Scholar
[8] Healey, R.A. “Quantum Realism: Naivete is No Excuse.” Synthese 42(1979): 121–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[9] Jauch, J.M. Foundations of Quantum Mechanics. Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley, 1968.Google Scholar
[10] Kochen, S., and Specker, E. “The Problem of Hidden Variables in Quantum Mechanics.” Journal of Mathematics and Mechanics 17 (1967): 59–87.Google Scholar
[11] Margenau, H. “Measurements and Quantum States” I and II. Philosophy of Science 30(1963): 1–16, 138-157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[12] Stairs, A. Quantum Mechanics, Logic and Reality. Unpublished Ph.D. Thesis, University of Western Ontario, 1978. Xerox University Microfilms Publication Number 03-30162.Google Scholar
[13] van Fraassen, B. “The Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen Paradox.” Synthese 29(1974): 291–339. (As reprinted in Logic and Probability in Quantum Mechanics. Edited by Suppes, P. Dordrecht: Reidel, 1976. Pages 283–301.)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[14] Wigner, E. “Remarks on the Mind-Body Question.” In The Scientist Speculates. Edited by Good, I.J. New York: Basic Books, 1962. Pages 284–302. (As reprinted in Symmetries and Reflections. Cambridge, Mass.: M.I.T. Press, 1967. Pages 171–184.)Google Scholar
[15] Wigner, E. “On Hidden Variables and Quantum Mechanical Probabilities.” American Journal of Physics 38(1970): 1005–1009.Google Scholar