Published online by Cambridge University Press: 31 January 2023
I show that locality, as it occurs in EPR arguments for the incompleteness of quantum mechanics, can be construed as causal independence understood in terms of Lewis’ counterfactual analysis of causation. This construal has two benefits. It supplements recent analyses, which have not treated locality in detail. And it clarifies the relation between two EPR arguments that have recently been distinguished. It shows that the simpler of the two is more complex than has been thought; and that the other argument does not need ‘counterfactual definiteness’.
I aim to show that in the EPR argument (Einstein et al. 1935) for the incompleteness of quantum mechanics (QM), locality can be taken as causal independence, understood in terms of Lewis’ counterfactual analysis of causation.
Recent analyses of the EPR argument makes this construal of locality timely, for two reasons. First, these analyses typically say little about locality.
I am grateful to audiences in Cambridge and Princeton; and especially to Alan Hajek, Martin Jones, and Rob Clifton.