No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Beliefs and Concepts: Comments on Brian Loar “Must Beliefs Be Sentences?”
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 28 February 2022
Abstract
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Part XV. Language and Thought
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © 1983 Philosophy of Science Association
References
Dennett, Daniel C. (1969). Content and Consciousness. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Foster, J.A. (1976). “Meaning and Truth Theory.” In Truth and Meaning: Essays in Semantics. Edited by Evans, Gareth and McDowell, John. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Pages 1-32.Google Scholar
Harman, Gilbert. (1974). “Meaning and Semantics.” In Semantics and Philosophy. Edited by Munitz, Milton K. and Unger, Peter K.. New York: New York University Press. Pages 1-16.Google Scholar
Harman, Gilbert. (1982). “Conceptual Role Semantics.” Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 23: 242-256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kripke, Saul. (1972). “Naming and Necessity.” In Semantics of Natural Language. Edited by Davidson, Donald and Harman, Gilbert. Dordrecht, Holland: D. Reidel. Pages 253-355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loar, Brian. (1983). “Must Beliefs Be Sentences?” In PSA 1982. Volume 2. Edited by Asquith, P.D. and Nickles, T.. East Lansing, Michigan: Philosophy of Science Association. Pages 627-643.Google Scholar
Ryle, Gilbert. (1953). “Ordinary Language.” The Philosophical Review 62: 167-186. (As reprinted in Ryle (1971). Pages 301-318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ryle, Gilbert. (1961). “Use, Usage, and Meaning. I.” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 35: 223-230. (As reprinted in Ryle (1971). Pages 407-414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar