Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T20:08:55.489Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

An Information-Processing Theory of Mental Imagery: A Case Study in the New Mentalistic Psychology

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 March 2022

George E. Smith  and
Stephen M. Kosslyn
George E. Smith
Affiliation:
Tufts University
Stephen M. Kosslyn
Affiliation:
Harvard University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Mental imagery has been on the defensive for the last fifty years. Philosophers have argued that talk of mental images invites systematic confusion, that such talk is at best metaphorical, and that it consequently creates only an unfortunate illusion of explanation when it is taken literally. Such a prioristic objections ought to carry less weight in the case of experimental studies of imagery since empirical findings are likely to supply nonmetaphorical content where it is needed. Nevertheless, the same sorts of criticism have been put forward against experimental efforts. Added to this is a suspicion that mental imagery is not compatible with a strictly computational account of mental processes and hence it is out of step with the most promising research occurring in cognitive psychology. So, even in the case of experimental studies, there is a presumptive burden of argument on those who take mental imagery seriously.

Type
Part IV. Imagery and Representation in Psychology
Information
PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association , Volume 1980 , Issue 2: Volume Two: Symposia and Invited Papers 1980 , 1980 , pp. 247 - 266
Copyright
Copyright © 1981 by the Philosophy of Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anderson, J.R. (1978). “Arguments Concerning Representations for Mental Imagery.” Psychological Review 85: 249-277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, J.R. (1979). “Further Arguments Concerning Representations for Mental Imagery: A Response to Hayes-Roth and Pylyshyn.” Psychological Review 86: 395-406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cooper, L.A. and Shepard, R.N. (1973). “Chronometric Studies of the Rotation of Mental Images.” In Visual Information Processing Edited by Chase, W.G.. New York: Academic Press. Pages 75-176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farah, M. and Kosslyn, S.M. (in press). “Learning Concepts.” In Advances in Child Development and Behavior, Vol. 16. Edited by Lipsitt, L.P. and H.W., Reese. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Finke, R.A. (1980). “Levels of Equivalence in Imagery and Perception.” Psychological Review 87: 113-132.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Finke, R.A. and Kosslyn, S.M. (1980). “Mental Imagery Acuity in the Peripheral Visual Field.” Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 6: 126-139.Google Scholar
Kosslyn, S.M. (1975). “Information Representation in Visual Images.” Cognitive Psychology 7: 341-370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kosslyn, S.M. (1976). “Can Imagery Be Distinguished from Other Forms of Internal Representation? Evidence from Studies of Information Retrieval Time.” Memory and Cognition 4: 291-297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kosslyn, S.M. (1978). “Measuring the Visual Angle of the Mind's Eye.” Cognitive Psychology 10: 359-389.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kosslyn, S.M. (1980). Image and Mind. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Kosslyn, S.M. (1981). “The Medium and the Message in Mental Imagery: A Theory.” Psychological Review 88: 46-66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kosslyn, S.M., Pinker, S., Smith, G.E. and Shwartz, S.P. (1979). “On the Demystification of Mental Imagery.” The Behavioral and Brain Sciences 2: 535-581.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pylyshyn, Z.W. (1981). “The Imagery Debate: Analogue Media Versus Tacit Knowledge.” Psychological Review 88: 16-45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ryle, G.(1949). The Concept of Mind. London: Hutchinson and Co., Ltd.Google Scholar
Smith, E.E. (1978). “Theories of Semantic Memory.” In Handbook of Learning and Cognitive Processes, Vol. 6. Edited by Estes, William K.. Hillsdale, N.Y.: Erlbaum Press. Pages 1-56.Google Scholar