Hostname: page-component-f554764f5-44mx8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-04-08T17:29:57.032Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Against Scientific Imperialism

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2022

John Dupré
John Dupré*
Affiliation:
Stanford University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Most discussion of the unity of science has concerned what might be called vertical relations between theories: the reducibility of biology to chemistry, or chemistry to physics, and so on. In this paper I shall be concerned rather with horizontal relations, that is to say, with theories of different kinds that deal with objects at the same structural level. Whereas the former, vertical, conception of unity through reduction has come under a good deal of criticism recently (see, e.g., Dupré 1993), horizontal unity has generally been conceded to be an important goal. The most pressing questions about horizontal unification arise in the study of human behavior. Numerous sciences including psychology, economics, anthropology, sociology, and parts of biology, attempt to provide explanations of human behavior. It is possible that some of these sciences may be able to coexist peacefully or even cooperatively.

Type
Part XII. Unity and Disunity in Physics and Biology
Information
PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association , Volume 1994 , Issue 2: Volume Two: Symposia and Invited Papers 1994 , 1994 , pp. 374 - 381
Copyright
Copyright © 1995 by the Philosophy of Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Anderson, E. (1993), Value in Ethics and Economics. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Becker, G.S. (1981; enlarged ed. 1991), A Treatise on the Family. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Dupré, J. (1993), The Disorder of Things: Metaphysical Foundations of the Disunity of Science. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Frank, R.H., Gilovich, T. and Regan, D.T. (1993), “Does Studying Economics Inhibit Cooperation?”, Journal of Economic Perspectives 7: 159–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friedman, M. (1974), “Explanation and Scientific Understanding”, Journal of Philosophy 71: 5–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gagnier, R. (1993), “On the Insatiability of Human Wants: Economic and Aesthetic Man”, Victorian Studies 36: 125–154.Google Scholar
Gauthier, D. (1986), Morals by Agreement. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hamilton, W.D. and Zuk, M. (1982), “Heritable True Fitness and Bright Birds: A Role for Parasites?”, Science 218: 384–387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kitcher, P. (1981), “Explanatory Unification”, Philosophy of Science 48: 507–531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oakeshott, M. (1962), “Political Education”, in Rationalism in Politics and Other Essays. New York: Basic Books, pp. 111–136.Google Scholar
Philipson, T.J. and Posner, R.A. (1993), Private Choices and Public Health: The AIDS Epidemic in Economic Perspective. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Sen, A.K. (1979), “Rational Fools: A Critique of the Behavioural Foundations of Economic Theory”, in Hahn, F. and Hollis, M., (eds.), Philosophy and Economic Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 86–109.Google Scholar
Shapin, S. (1994), A Social History of Truth. Chicago: Chicago University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, A. (1776), The Wealth of Nations. Edited by Cannan, E., New York: The Modern Library (1937).Google Scholar