No CrossRef data available.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 28 February 2022
The opening paragraphs of Thomas Kuhn's Structure of Scientific Revolutions noted that different kinds of scientific writings have peculiar roles (Kuhn 1962). A textbook written for pedagogical purposes in a well-established scientific field gives a view of the field quite different from the actual history—an actual history that for the most part has to be reconstructed from the writings that originated the field. The originating writings correspond to the period of founding, to revolutionary science, whereas conventionalized textbooks belong to normal science.
This is almost too well known to be rehearsed again. Certain works found a science, like Newton's Opticks or Watson and Crick's original papers on the double-helical structure of DNA; others come in their wake, not just textbooks used for beginners but all the future texts that contribute to the paradigm project embodied in the originals.