Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-d8cs5 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-05T11:01:35.560Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Function of Credit in Hull's Evolutionary Model of Science

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 January 2023

Noretta Koertge
Noretta Koertge*
Affiliation:
Indiana University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

David Hull’s book (1988) provides an evolutionary account of the development of science which pays attention to both the social and conceptual aspects of that process. Unlike most philosophers who only invoke Darwinian metaphors in a casual way, Hull takes the analogy between the biological evolution of species and the growth of scientific knowledge quite seriously and by providing abstract definitions of terms such as replicator, interactor and lineage, he makes it possible for us to see clearly the structural similarities between the two historical processes.

Other symposiasts will comment on how tight that analogy really is. I must remark in passing that I have never understood the intense interest which evolutionary epistemologists take in this comparison. Surely our major job is to understand how science works, perhaps by using evolutionary theory as a fallible heuristic, but nothing seems to hinge on the extent of the formal analogy.

Type
Part VI. Science as Process
Information
PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association , Volume 1990 , Issue 2: Volume Two: Symposia and Invited Papers 1990 , 1990 , pp. 237 - 244
Copyright
Copyright © Philosophy of Science Association 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Dijksterhuis, E.J. (1961), The Mechanization of the World Picture. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hull, D.L. (1988), Science as a Process: An Evolutionary Account of the Social and Conceptual Development of Science. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kemal, Y. (1979), Mehmet, My Hawk. Denmark: Gyuldendalo Bogklub.Google Scholar
Pagels, E. (1979), The Gnostic Gospels. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
Popper, K.R. (1972), Objective Knowledge: An Evolutionary Approach. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar