Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-s2hrs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-06T03:03:51.753Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Experimental Reproducibility and the Experimenters’ Regress

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2022

Hans Radder
Hans Radder*
Affiliation:
Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Many philosophers of science tend to take for granted the proposition that, as a rule, scientific experiments are reproducible (or, in other words, repeatable, replicable). Very few of them, however, have examined the issue in any detail (a recent exception is Hones 1990). Yet, by now an important body of literature exists, mainly written by sociologists and historians of science, in which the above proposition is discussed and analyzed on the basis of elaborate studies of experimental practice. These studies claim to offer not only a descriptively adequate account of experimentation, but also a number of fundamental philosophical conclusions concerning (experimental) science as a whole.

In the present paper I analyze and evaluate the views of H.M. Collins, an early and influential thinker concerning the issue in question. In particular I discuss what he has called the ‘experimenters’ regress’.

Type
Part II. Experimentation
Information
PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association , Volume 1992 , Issue 1: Volume One: Contributed Papers 1992 , 1992 , pp. 63 - 73
Copyright
Copyright © 1992 by the Philosophy of Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Brown, J.R. (1989), The Rational and the Social. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Collins, H.M. (1985), Changing Order. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Draaisma, D. (1989), “Voorbij het getal van Avogadro: de Benveniste-affaire”, Kennis en Methode 13: 84-107.Google Scholar
Gooding, D. (1985), ‘“In Nature’s School’: Faraday as an Experimentalist”, in Faraday Rediscovered, Gooding, D. and James, F.A.L.J. (eds.). New York: Stockton Press, pp. 105-35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gooding, D.. (1990), Experiment and the Making of Meaning. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hacking, I. (1988), “The Participant Irrealist at Large in the Laboratory”, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 39: 277-94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hesse, M. (1986), “Changing Concepts and Stable Order”, Social Studies of Science 16: 714-26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hones, MJ. (1990), “Reproducibility as a Methodological Imperative in Experimental Research”, in PSA 1990, Volume I, A. Fine, M. Forbes and L. Wessels (eds.). East Lansing: Philosophy of Science Association, pp. 585-99.Google Scholar
Latour, B. and Woolgar, S. (1979), Laboratory Life. Beverly Hills: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Nickles, T. (1988), “Reconstructing Science: Discovery and Experiment”, in Theory and Experiment, Batens, D. and van Bendegem, J.P. (eds.). Dordrecht: Reidel Publishing Company, pp. 33-53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Radder, H. (1988), The Material Realization of Science. Assen: Van Gorcum.Google Scholar
Radder, H.(forthcoming), “Experimenting in the Natural Sciences. A Philosophical Approach”, in The Autonomy of Experiment/The Sovereignty of Practice, Buchwald, J.Z. (ed.).Google Scholar
Rouse, J. (1987), Knowledge and Power. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Salmon, W. (1984), Scientific Explanation and the Causal Structure of the World. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Schaffer, S. (1989), “Glass Works: Newton’s Prisms and the Uses of Experiment”, in The Uses of Experiment, Gooding, D. , Pinch, T. and Schaffer, S. (eds.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 67-104.Google Scholar
Shapin, S and Schaffer, S. (1985), Leviathan and the Air-Pump. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar