Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T19:35:38.439Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Bell’s Inequality, Information Transmission, and Prism Models

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2022

Tim Maudlin*
Affiliation:
Rutgers University

Extract

Suppose we set about creating pairs of photons in the singlet state, allow them to separate to some considerable distance, and then send each photon into a polarizer oriented at some randomly chosen angle. Quantum theory predicts that in the long run we will observe the following behavior. On each wing of the experiment we will see perfectly random behavior. Roughly half of the photons will pass their polarizers and half will be absorbed. There will be no correlation between passage or absorption in one experiment and passage or absorption in the succeeding experiments. There will be no correlation between the passage or absorption and the angle at which the polarizer is set. But when we examine the correlations between the two wings of the experiment, something remarkable emerges.

Type
Part X. Quantum Theory II
Copyright
Copyright © 1992 by the Philosophy of Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

1

I would like to thank an anonymous referee for very helpful suggestions.

References

Bell, J.S. (1976), “The Theory of Local Beables”, Epistemological Letters: March 1976,11-24, reprinted as chapter 7 of Bell’s 1987 Speakable and Unspeakable in Quantum Mechanics, Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Fine, A. (1982), “Some Local Models for Correlation Experiments”, Synthese 50: 279-294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fine, A. (1989), “Correlations and Efficiency: Testing the Bell Inequalities”, Foundations of Physics 19: 231-478CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jarrett, J. (1984), “On the Physical Significance of the Locality Conditions in the Bell Arguments”, Nous 18: 569-589.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sharp, W.D. and Shanks, N. (1985), “Fine’s Prism Models for Quantum Correlation Experiments”, Philosophy of Science 52: 538-564CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shimony, A. (1989), “Our Worldview and Microphysics” , in Philosophical Consequences of Quantum Theory: Reflections on Bell’s Theorem, Cushing, J.T. and McMullin, E. (eds.). Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame PressGoogle Scholar