Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-lrblm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-13T03:59:35.779Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Assessing Functional Explanations in the Social Sciences

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 January 2023

Harold Kincaid
Harold Kincaid*
Affiliation:
University of Alabama
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Despite decades of controversy, functionalism continues to be a lively research tradition in the social sciences. Furthermore, social scientists who reject Parsonian functionalism and its variants frequently make liberal use of functional explanations. Yet, neither social scientists nor philosophers have reached any consensus on when and where functional accounts are legitimate. Critics doubt that functionalism is really explanatory or testable; advocates are unfortunately vague on their claims and the evidence for them. In what follows I try to clarify what functionalism entails, discuss some ways in which functional hypotheses can be confirmed, and evaluate criticisms. While I think much functionalism is bad science, I hope to show that the problem is not one of principle but of practice.

Social scientists use the term “functionalism” in diverse ways. At times the term refers to a specific theoretical movement in sociology and anthropology—the movement identified with Malinowski and Parsons.

Type
Part VI. Special Sciences
Information
PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association , Volume 1990 , Issue 1: Volume One: Contributed Papers 1990 , 1990 , pp. 341 - 354
Copyright
Copyright © Philosophy of Science Association 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alexander, J.C. (1983), “The Modern Reconstruction of Classical Thought: Talcott Parsons,” Theoretical Logic in Sociology. Volume IV. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Allen, M.R. (1967), Male Cults and Secret Initiations in Melanesia. Victoria: Melbourne University Press.Google Scholar
Boyd, R. and Richerson, P. (1985), Culture and the Evolutionary Process. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Cohen, G.A. (1978), Karl Marx’s Theory of History: A Defence. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Eisenstadt, S.N. (1985), “Systematic Qualities and Boundaries of Societies,” in Neofunctionalism, Alexander, J.C. (ed). Beverly Hills: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Ellen, R. (1982), Environment, Subsistence and System: the Ecology of Small-Scale Social Formations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elster, J. (1983), Explaining Technical Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Endler, J.A. (1986), Natural Selection in the Wild. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Faia, M. (1986), Dynamic Functionalism: Strategy and Tactics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hallpike, C. (1986), Principles of Social Evolution. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hannan, M.T. and Freeman, J. (1989), Organizational Ecology. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harris, M. (1979), Cannibals and Kings. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
Milliband, R. (1969), The State in Capitalist Society. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Piven, F.F. and Cloward, R.A. (1971), Regulating the Poor: The Functions of Public Welfare. New York: Pantheon Books.Google Scholar
Rappaport, R.A. (1984), Pigs for the Ancestors: Ritual in the Ecology of a New Guinea People. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Sober, E. (1984), The Nature of Selection. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Stincombe, A. (1968), Constructing Social Theories. New York: Harcourt, Brace and World.Google Scholar
Turner, J.H. and Maryanski, A. (1979), Functionalism. Menlo Park: Benjamin/Cummings Publishing.Google Scholar
Vayda, A.P. (1987), “Explaining What People Eat: A Review Article,” Human Ecology 15: 493–510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yalmon, N. (1963), “On the Purity of Women in the Castes of Ceylon and Malabar,” Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 93: 25–58.Google Scholar
Young, R. (1988), “Is Population Ecology a Useful Paradigm for the Study of Organizations?”, American Journal of Sociology 94:124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar