Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T12:35:22.089Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

What, Where, Who, and Why? An Empirical Investigation of Positionality in Political Science Field Experiments

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 May 2022

Cristina Corduneanu-Huci Open the ORCID record for Cristina Corduneanu-Huci [Opens in a new window] ,
Michael T. Dorsch Open the ORCID record for Michael T. Dorsch [Opens in a new window]  and
Paul Maarek Open the ORCID record for Paul Maarek [Opens in a new window]
Cristina Corduneanu-Huci
Affiliation:
Central European University, Austria
Michael T. Dorsch
Affiliation:
Central European University, Austria
Paul Maarek
Affiliation:
Université Paris-Panthéon-Assas, France
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Field Experiments: Thinking Through Identity and Positionality
Information
PS: Political Science & Politics , Volume 55 , Issue 4 , October 2022 , pp. 741 - 748
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the American Political Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Allcott, Hunt. 2015. “Site-Selection Bias in Program Evaluation.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 130 (3): 1117–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blair, Graeme, Iyengar, Radha K., and Shapiro, Jacob N.. 2013. “Where Policy Experiments Are Conducted in Economics and Political Science: The Missing Autocracies.” Princeton, NJ: Princeton University. Working Paper.Google Scholar
Bold, Tessa, Kimenyi, Mwangi, Mwabu, Germano, Sandefur, Justin, et al. 2018. “Experimental Evidence on Scaling Up Education Reforms in Kenya.” Journal of Public Economics 168:1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cansun, Sebnem, and Arik, Engin. 2018. “Political Science Publications about Turkey.” Scientometrics 115 (1): 169–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Codato, Adriano, Madeira, Rafael, and Bittencourt, Maiane. 2020. “Political Science in Latin America: A Scientometric Analysis.” Brazilian Political Science Review 14 (3): e0007. DOI:10.1590/1981-3821202000030005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corduneanu-Huci, Cristina, Dorsch, Michael T., and Maarek, Paul. 2021. “The Politics of Experimentation: Political Competition and Randomized Controlled Trials.” Journal of Comparative Economics 49 (1): 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cronin-Furman, Kate, and Lake, Milli. 2018. “Ethics Abroad: Fieldwork in Fragile and Violent Contexts.” PS: Political Science & Politics 51 (3): 607–14.Google Scholar
Das, Sabyasachi. 2020. “(Don’t) Leave Politics Out of It: Reflections on Public Policies, Experiments, and Interventions.” World Development 127:104792.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, Justine M. 2020. “Manipulating Africa? Perspectives on the Experimental Method in the Study of African Politics.” African Affairs 119 (476): 452–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, Justine M., and Mitchelich, Kristin. 2022. “Field Experiments: Thinking through Identity and Positionality.” PS : Political Science & Politics. DOI:10.1017/S1049096522000671.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deaton, Angus. 2020. “Randomization in the Tropics Revisited: A Theme and Eleven Variations.” Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research. Technical Report.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duflo, Esther. 2017. “Richard T. Ely Lecture: The Economist as Plumber.” American Economic Review 107 (5): 1–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dupuis, Marc, Endicott-Popovsky, Barbara, and Crossler, Robert. 2013. “An Analysis of the Use of Amazon’s Mechanical Turk for Survey Research in the Cloud.” In Proceedings of the International Conference on Cloud Security Management: ICCSM 2013, 10–18. Seattle: University of Washington.Google Scholar
Evans, David K. 2021. “Towards Improved and More Transparent Ethics in Randomised Controlled Trials in Development Social Science.” Washington, DC: Center for Global Development.Google Scholar
Gerber, Alan. 2011. “Field Experiments in Political Science.” In Cambridge Handbook of Experimental Political Science, ed. Druckman, James N., Greene, Donald P., Kuklinski, James H., and Lupia, Arthur, 115–38). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI:10.1017/CBO9780511921452.009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Green, Donald P., Calfano, Brian R., and Aronow, Peter M.. 2014. “Field Experimental Designs for the Study of Media Effects.” Political Communication 31 (1): 168–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haas, Nicholas, Haenschen, Katherine, Kumar, Tanu, Panagopoulos, Costas, Peyton, Kyle, Ravanilla, Nico, and Sierra-Arévalo, Michael. 2022. “Organizational Identity and Positionality in Randomized Control Trials: Considerations and Advice for Collaborative Research Teams.” PS : Political Science & Politics. DOI:10.1017/S1049096522000026.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herman, Biz, Panin, Amma, Owlsley, Nicholas, Blair, Graeme, Dyzenhaus, Alex, Wellman, Elizabeth, Grossman, Allison, Opalo, Ken, Singh, Anisha, Alarian, Hannah, Pruett, Lindsay, and Tan, Yvonne. 2022. “Field Experiments in the Global South: Assessing Risks, Localizing Benefits, and Addressing Positionality.” Forthcoming in PS : Political Science & Politics.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Humphreys, Macartan, and Weinstein, Jeremy M.. 2009. “Field Experiments and the Political Economy of Development.” Annual Review of Political Science 12:367–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, Eunji, Badrinathan, Sumitra, Danny, D. H. Choi, Karim, Sabrina, and Zhou, Yang-Yang. 2022. “Navigating ‘Insider’ and ‘Outsider’ Status as Researchers Conducting Field Experiments.” PS : Political Science & Politics. DOI:10.1017/S1049096522000208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levine, Adam Seth. 2021. “How to Form Organizational Partnerships to Run Experiments.” In Advances in Experimental Political Science, ed. Druckman, James N. and Green, Donald P., 199–216. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI:10.1017/9781108777919.014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDermott, Rose, and Hatemi, Peter K.. 2020. “Ethics in Field Experimentation: A Call to Establish New Standards to Protect the Public from Unwanted Manipulation and Real Harms.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 117 (48): 30014–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ogden, Timothy. 2017. Experimental Conversations: Perspectives on Randomized Trials in Development Economics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Ouma, Marion. 2020. “Trust, Legitimacy, and Community Perceptions on Randomisation of Cash Transfers.” CODESRIA Bulletin 1:25–28.Google Scholar
Panin, Amma. 2020. “Economics Experiments in Africa: How Many and by Whom.” CODESRIA Bulletin 4:23–29.Google Scholar
Phillips, Trisha. 2021. “Ethics of Field Experiments.” Annual Review of Political Science 24:277–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scientometrics. 2022. “Aims and Scope.” https://www.springer.com/journal/11192/aims-and-scope. (Accessed November 4, 2021.)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shah, Neil Buddy, Wang, Paul, Fraker, Andrew, and Gastfriend, Daniel. 2015. “Evaluations with Impact. Decision-Focused Impact Evaluation as a Practical Policymaking Tool.” Washington, DC: International Initiative for Impact Evaluation. Working Paper 25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shanghai Ranking. 2019. https://www.shanghairanking.com/rankings/gras/2019/RS0504. (Accessed November 4, 2021.)Google Scholar
Soedirgo, Jessica, and Glas, Aarie. 2020. “Toward Active Reflexivity: Positionality and Practice in the Production of Knowledge.” PS: Political Science & Politics 53 (3): 527–31.Google Scholar
Vivalt, Eva. 2020. “How Much Can We Generalize from Impact Evaluations?” Journal of the European Economic Association 18 (6): 3045–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, Matthew Charles, and Knutsen, Carl Henrik. 2020. “Geographical Coverage in Political Science Research.” Perspectives on Politics: 1–16.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: Link

Corduneanu-Huci et al. supplementary material

Corduneanu-Huci et al. supplementary material

https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/JVW4NF
Link
Supplementary material: PDF

Corduneanu-Huci et al. supplementary material

Corduneanu-Huci et al. supplementary material

Download Corduneanu-Huci et al. supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 601.3 KB