Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T22:07:57.231Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

What Do You Desire? What Do You Fear? Theorize it! Teaching Political Theory through Utopian Writing

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2005

Khristina Haddad
Affiliation:
Moravian College

Extract

Undergraduate students should not just study political theory. They should theorize. Writing-intensive political theory courses can help them do so sooner. By preparing an original political vision, a utopia or a dystopia, throughout the course of the semester, students read and compare the texts of the course against their own emerging texts and move into more critical and systematic political analysis. As a political theorist, my focus is not so much on utopias or dystopias as a subject of study per se, but on tapping into the creative freedom, critical distance, and hard-hitting insights of these traditions while teaching writing. I take seriously Berlin's above-stated concern for the “place and mode of operation” conveyed to the student through the process of learning to write. Visionary writing accelerates students' appreciation of the complexity of another's theory, but also of their own standpoint and capacity for agency and judgment.Khristina Haddad is assistant professor, department of political science, Moravian College. She teaches a writing-intensive course on visionary political writing and is affiliated with German Studies and Women's Studies. Her research interests include politics of time and temporality, Hannah Arendt, political action, fear, feminist theory, women's studies, and, in particular, the politics of women's health.I am greatly indebted to friends and colleagues who helped me along at various stages including (in alphabetical order) Robert Humanick, Eleanor Linn, Bob Mayer, Karla Morales, Laurie Naranch, Gary Olson, Miguelina Ortiz, Martha Reid, Joanna Vecchiarelli Scott, Lyman Tower Sargent, Joel Wingard, and Elizabeth Wingrove. Thanks go also to all those whose dedicated work inspires student writers and teachers of writing at the Gayle Morris Sweetland Writing Center at the University of Michigan, to helpful commentators at the Society for Utopian Studies' Annual Meeting in Toronto, to two anonymous reviewers at PS, and to three groups of students who shared their visions with me.

Type
THE TEACHER
Copyright
© 2005 The American Political Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Arendt, Hannah. 1963. Eichmann in Jerusalem: A Report on the Banality of Evil. New York: Viking Press.Google Scholar
Berlin, James. 1996. “Contemporary Composition: The Major Pedagogical Theories.” In Composition in Four Keys: Inquiring into the Field, eds. Mark Wiley, Barbara Gleason, and Louise Weatherbee Phelps. Mountain View, CA: Mayfield Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Hamilton, David. 1980. “Interdisciplinary Writing.” College English, 41 (March): 780.Google Scholar
Hjortshoj, Keith. 2001. Transition to College Writing. Boston: Bedford/St. Martin's Press.Google Scholar
Lunsford, Andrea. 1999. The New St. Martin's Handbook. Boston: Bedford/St. Martin's Press.Google Scholar
Machiavelli, Niccolo. 1985. The Prince. Trans. Harvey C. Mansfield. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Murray, Donald. 2003. “Teaching Writing as a Process Not a Product.” In Cross-Talk in Comp Theory—A Reader, ed. Victor Villanueva. Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.Google Scholar
Rousseau, Jean Jacques. 1992. Discourse on the Origin of Inequality. Trans. Donald Cress. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Company.Google Scholar