Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T21:06:41.393Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Was the 2000 Presidential Election Predictable?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 May 2002

Robert S. Erikson
Affiliation:
Professor of political science at Columbia University. His most recent book is The Macro Polity, coauthored with Michael MacKuen and James Stimson. His research interests include voting behavior and electoral politics.
Joseph Bafumi
Affiliation:
Ph.D. candidate at Columbia University.
Bret Wilson
Affiliation:
An instructor of political science and a U.S. Army captain at the United States Military Academy (West Point).

Extract

In late August 2000, at APSA's Annual Meeting, a panel of political scientists offered forecasts for the 2000 presidential election. Although they differed in particulars, most of the forecasters' models incorporated a measure of economic growth plus the president's approval rating. Because the economy was prospering and President Clinton enjoyed phenomenal approval numbers for the eighth year of office, the consensus prediction was a Democratic (Gore) victory by upwards of 6 percentage points. Although political scientists had offered forecasts before previous presidential elections, these political scientists' predictions for 2000 attracted more interest than usual. Their predictions drew exceptional interest both during the campaign, when nobody knew for sure how the election would turn out, and after, when the forecasters had to account for their mistakes.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 2001 by the American Political Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)