Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T07:37:37.477Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Using US Senate Delegations from the Same State as Paired Comparisons: Evidence for a Reagan Realignment

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 March 2018

Thomas L. Brunell  and
Bernard Grofman
Thomas L. Brunell
Affiliation:
University of Texas at Dallas
Bernard Grofman
Affiliation:
University of California, Irvine
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The fact that two senators are elected from each state offers the potential for natural paired comparisons. In particular, examining historical and geographic patterns in terms of changes in the number of divided US Senate delegations (i.e., states whose two senators are of different parties) is a useful route to testing competing models of American politics, including theories of split-ticket voting, party polarization, and realignment. Brunell and Grofman (1998) used divided Senate delegations to indirectly examine evidence for realignment. We hypothesized that a partisan realignment will necessarily lead to a cyclical pattern in the number of divided Senate delegations. We predicted that the number of divided Senate delegations at the state level would decline after 1996 because we conjectured that there had been a realignment cusp around 1980. We tested this prediction with data from 1952–2016 and our prediction was confirmed.

Type
Articles
Information
PS: Political Science & Politics , Volume 51 , Issue 3 , July 2018 , pp. 512 - 516
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Alesina, Alberto, and Rosenthal, Howard. 1995. Partisan Politics, Divided Government and the Economy. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brunell, Thomas L., and Grofman, Bernard. 1998. “Explaining Divided Senate Delegations, 1788–1996: A Realignment Approach.” American Political Science Review 92 (2): 391–9.Google Scholar
Donnelly, Christopher P. 2015. “Balancing Act? Testing a Theory of Split-Party US Senate Delegations.” Electoral Studies 38 (1): 19–27.Google Scholar
Enten, Harry. 2016. “There Were No Purple States on Tuesday.” November 10. Available at http://fivethirtyeight.com/features/there-were-no-purple-states-on-Tuesday.Google Scholar
Fiorina, Morris P. 1996. Divided Government. Second edition. New York: Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar
Grofman, Bernard, Griffin, Robert, and Berry, Gregory. 1995. “House Members Who Become Senators: Learning from a ‘Natural Experiment’ in Representation.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 20 (4): 513–29.Google Scholar
Grofman, Bernard, Griffin, Robert, and Glazer, Amihai. 1990. “Identical Geography, Different Party: A Natural Experiment on the Magnitude of Party Differences in the U.S. Senate, 1960–84.” In Developments in Electoral Geography, eds. Johnston, R. J., Shelley, F. M., and Taylor, P. J., 207–17. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Grofman, Bernard, Koetzle, William, McDonald, Michael, and Brunell, Thomas. 2000. “A New Look at Split-Ticket Voting for House and President: The Comparative Midpoints Model.” Journal of Politics 62 (1): 34–50.Google Scholar
Mayhew, David R. 2004. Electoral Realignments: A Critique of an American Genre. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Merrill, Samuel III, Grofman, Bernard, and Brunell, Thomas L.. 2008. “Cycles in American National Electoral Politics, 1854–2006: Statistical Evidence and an Explanatory Model.” American Political Science Review 102 (1): 1–17.Google Scholar
Poole, Keith, and Rosenthal, Howard. 1984. “The Polarization of American Politics.” Journal of Politics 46: 1061–79.Google Scholar
Schiller, Wendy J. 2000. Partners and Rivals: Representation in US Senate Delegations. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Wattenberg, Martin P. 1991. The Rise of Candidate-Centered Politics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wattenberg, Martin P. 1996. The Decline of American Political Parties 1952–1996. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar