Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T19:40:28.514Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Twitter Style: An Analysis of How House Candidates Used Twitter in Their 2012 Campaigns

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 April 2014

Heather K. Evans ,
Victoria Cordova  and
Savannah Sipole
Heather K. Evans
Affiliation:
Sam Houston State University
Victoria Cordova
Affiliation:
Sam Houston State University
Savannah Sipole
Affiliation:
Sam Houston State University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article examines how House candidates used Twitter during the 2012 campaign. Using a content analysis of every tweet from each candidate for the House in the final two months before the 2012 election, this study provides a snapshot of House candidates’ “Twitter style.” In particular, this article shows that incumbents, Democrats, women, and those in competitive races tweet differently than challengers, Republicans, minor party candidates, men, and those in safe districts.

Type
Features
Information
PS: Political Science & Politics , Volume 47 , Issue 2 , April 2014 , pp. 454 - 462
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Amman, Sky L. 2010. “A Political Campaign Message in 140 Characters or Less: The Use of Twitter by U.S. Senate Candidates in 2010. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1725477CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barbera, Pablo. 2013. “Birds of the Same Feather Tweet Together. Bayesian Ideal Point Estimation Using Twitter Data.” Working paper available athttp://cprg.polisci.ucla.edu/barbera.pdf.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beevolve, . 2012. “An Exhaustive Study of Twitter Users Across the World.” http://www.beevolve.com/Twitter-statistics/Google Scholar
Benoit, William L. 2004. “Political Party Affiliation and Presidential Campaign Discourse.” Communication Quarterly 52 (2): 89–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bystrom, Dianne and Kaid, Lynda Lee. 2002. “Are Women Candidates Transforming Campaign Communication? A Comparison of Advertising Videostyles in the 1990s.” In Women Transforming Congress, ed C.S. Rosenthal. Norman, : University of Oklahoma Press.Google Scholar
Converse, Philip E. 1964. “The Nature of Belief Systems in Mass Publics.” In Ideology and Discontent, ed. Apter., DavidLondon: The Free Press of Glencoe.Google Scholar
Glassman, Matthew Eric, Straus, Jacob R., and Shogan, Colleen J.. 2010. “Social Networking and Constituent Communications: Member Use of Twitter During a Two-Month Period in the 111th Congress.” CRS Report for Congress.Google Scholar
Golbeck, Jennifer, Grimes, Justin M., and Rogers, Anthony. 2010. “Twitter Use by the U.S. Congress.” Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 61 (8): 1612–621.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldstein, Ken, and Freedman, Paul. 2002. “Campaign Advertising and Voter Turnout: New Evidence for a Stimulation Effect.” Journal of Politics 64 (3): 721–40.Google Scholar
Gueorguieva, V. 2007. “Voters, Myspace, and YouTube: The Impact of Alternative Communication Channels on the 2006 Election Cycle and Beyond.” Social Science Computer Review 26 (3): 288–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haber, Steven. 2011. “The 2010 U.S. Senate Elections in 140 Characters or Less: An Analysis of How Candidates Use Twitter as a Campaign Tool.” Available at: http://aladinrc.wrlc.org/bitstream/handle/1961/10028/Haber,%20Steven%20-%20Spring%20%2711.pdf?sequence=1Google Scholar
Lassen, David S., and Brown, Adam R.. 2011. “Twitter: The Electoral Connection.” Social Science Computer Review 29 (4): 419–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mayhew, David R. 1974. Congress: The Electoral Connection, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Pear Analytics. 2009. “Twitter Study” Available at: http://www.scribd.com/doc/18548460/Pear-Analytics-Twitter-Study-August-2009Google Scholar
Pew Research Center. 2013. “The Demographics of Social Media Users – 2012.” Available at: http://pewinternet.org/∼/media/Files/Reports/2013/PIP_SocialMediaUsers.pdf.Google Scholar
Proctor, David E., Schench-Hanlin, William J., and Haase, Karen. 1994. “Exploring the Role of Gender in the Development of Negative Political Advertising.” Women and Politics 14: 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skemp, K. 2009. “All A-Twitter about the Massachussetts Senate Primary.” http://bostonist.com/2009/12/01/massachusetts_senate_primary_debate_Twitter.phpGoogle Scholar
Tumasjan, Andranik, Sprenger, Timm O., Sandner, Philipp G., and Welpe, Isabell M.. 2010. “Predicting Elections with Twitter: What 140 Characters Reveal about Political Sentiment.” Proceedings of the Fourth International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media, 178–85. https://www.aaai.org/ocs/index.php/ICWSM/ICWSM10/paper/viewFile/1441/1852CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, Christine B., and Gulati, Girish J.. 2006. “The Evolution of Online Campaigning in Senate Elections 2000–2004.” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago, IL.Google Scholar
Williams, Christine B., and Gulati, Girish J.. 2008. “What is a Social Network Worth? Facebook and Vote Share in the 2008 Presidential Primaries.” Presented at the 2008 American Political Science Association Annual Meeting, Boston, MA.Google Scholar
Williams, Christine B., and Gulati, Girish J.. 2009. “Social Networks in Political Campaigns: Facebook and Congressional Elections 2006, 2008.” Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Toronto, Canada.Google Scholar
Williams, Christine B., and Gulati, Girish J.. 2010. “Communicating with Constituents in 140 Characters or Less” Working Papers. Paper 42. http://opensiuc.lib.siu.edu/pn_wp/43Google Scholar
Witt, Linda, Paget, Karen M., and Matthews, Glenna. 1994. Running as a Woman: Gender and Power in American Politics. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar