No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Tick, Tick, Boom: Simulating Human Rights Decisions in the Classroom
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 31 March 2022
Abstract
This article presents an original simulation, called Tick, Tick, Boom, which is designed to help students examine the use of torture in counterterrorism interrogations. The simulation is designed to be embedded in a larger array of course content but needs only one 50-minute class period to play. Unlike many similar games, students participate individually, learning the consequences of their actions through dice rolls. The article summarizes the gameplay and debriefing, presents a brief assessment of the simulation as an activity, and offers suggestions for future extensions.
- Type
- Article
- Information
- Copyright
- © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the American Political Science Association
References
REFERENCES
Allam, Nermin, Gallagher, Janice, Sidney, Mara, and Josephson, Jyl. 2021. “Outside-In Political Science: Implementing Community-Engaged Pedagogy across the Political Science Major.” PS: Political Science & Politics 54 (2): 377–80.Google Scholar
Asal, Victor, and Blake, Elizabeth L.. 2006. “Creating Simulations for Political Science Education.” Journal of Political Science Education 2 (1): 1–18.10.1080/15512160500484119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bell, Sarah, Mattern, Mark, and Telin, Mike. 2007. “Community-Action Learning.” Journal of Political Science Education 3:61–78.10.1080/15512160601115539CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brunell, Laura A. 2013. “Building Global Citizenship: Engaging Global Issues, Practicing Civil Skills.” Journal of Political Science Education 9 (1): 16–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeLaet, Debra L. 2016. “A Pedagogy of Civic Engagement for the Undergraduate Political Science Classroom.” Journal of Political Science Education 12 (1): 72–84.10.1080/15512169.2015.1063434CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elder, Laurel, and Wallace, Shelley. 2020. “Exploring Diversity and Student Political Activism through Archival Research.” PS: Political Science & Politics 53 (2): 333–37.Google Scholar
Feinstein, Dianne. 2014. The Senate Intelligence Committee Report on Torture: Committee Study of the Central Intelligence Agency’s Detention and Interrogation Program. Brooklyn, NY: Melville House Publishing.Google Scholar
Frank, Richard W., and Genauer, Jessica. 2019. “A Classroom Simulation of the Syrian Conflict.” PS: Political Science & Politics 52 (4): 737–42.Google Scholar
Frederking, Brian. 2005. “Simulations and Student Learning.” Journal of Political Science Education 1 (3): 385–93.10.1080/15512160500261236CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hassner, Ron E. 2018. “The Myth of the Ticking Bomb.” The Washington Quarterly 41 (1): 83–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hunsinger, George. 2008. “Torture Is the Ticking Time-Bomb: Why the Necessity Defense Fails.” Dialog: A Journal of Theology 47 (3): 228–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kille, Kent J. 2002. “Simulating the Creation of a New International Human Rights Treaty: Active Learning in the International Studies Classroom.” International Studies Perspectives 3:271–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Low, Bronwen, and Sonntag, Emmanuelle. 2013. “Towards a Pedagogy of Listening: Teaching and Learning from Life Stories of Human Rights Violations.” Journal of Curriculum Studies 45 (6): 768–89.10.1080/00220272.2013.808379CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luban, David. 2005. “Liberalism, Torture, and the Ticking Time Bomb.” Virginia Law Review 91:1425–61.Google Scholar
Marlin-Bennett, Renée. 2002. “Linking Experiential and Classroom Education: Lessons Learned from The American University—Amnesty International USA Summer Institute on Human Rights.” International Studies Perspectives 3:384–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McBride, Becca. 2017. “Teaching across Cultures: Student-Led Modules in a Human Rights Course.” PS: Political Science & Politics 50 (4): 1089–93.Google Scholar
Opotow, Susan. 2007. “Moral Exclusion and Torture: The Ticking-Time-Bomb Scenario and the Slippery Ethical Slope.” Peace and Conflict: Journal of Peace Psychology 13 (4): 457–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prokop, Andrew. 2014. “The Huge New Senate Report on CIA Torture, Explained.” Vox, December 9. www.vox.com/2014/12/9/7339753/senate-torture-report.Google Scholar
Propst, Lisa, and Robinson, Christopher C.. 2021. “Pandemic Fiction Meets Political Science: A Simulation for Teaching Restorative Justice.” PS: Political Science & Politics 54 (2): 340–45.Google Scholar
Richards, David L., Morrill, Mandy, and Anderson, Mary R.. 2012. “Some Psycho-Social Correlates of US Citizen Support for Torture.” Nordic Journal of Human Rights 30 (1): 63–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Siegel, David A., and Young, Joseph K.. 2009. “Simulating Terrorism: Credible Commitment, Costly Signaling, and Strategic Behavior.” PS: Political Science & Politics 42 (4): 765–71.Google Scholar
UN General Assembly. 1966. International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights. United Nations, Treaty Series, vol. 999. www.refworld.org/docid/3ae6b3aa0.html.Google Scholar
UN General Assembly. 1984. Convention Against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment. United Nations, Treaty Series, vol. 1465. www.refworld.org/docid/3ae6b3a94.html.Google Scholar
Walsh, James I., and Piazza, James A.. 2010. “Why Respecting Physical Integrity Rights Reduces Terrorism.” Comparative Political Studies 43 (5): 551–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weir, Kimberly A. 2021. “Learning by Logging: Tracking Choices, Habits, and Decisions.” Journal of Political Science Education 17 (2): 299–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watson supplementary material
Watson supplementary material
PDF
484.6 KB