Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T19:23:42.233Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Tea Party Movement and the 2012 House Election

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 October 2014

Andrew D. McNitt
Andrew D. McNitt*
Affiliation:
Eastern Illinois University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article examines Tea Party candidates for the US House of Representative in 2012. Tea Party and Tea Party–endorsed candidates are similar to other Republican candidates. Although they have served in the House for a shorter period, they have approximately the same financial resources, prior political experience, and reelection rate as other Republicans. Multivariate analysis finds that Tea Party membership and endorsement have no impact on electoral outcome when other political factors are controlled for (e.g., incumbency, running for an open seat, quality of opposing candidate, prior political experience, financial resources, and Obama’s vote). Consequently, the success of Tea Party candidates depends on acquiring the traditional political resources, having weak opponents, and running in favorably disposed constituencies rather than identification with this highly visible political movement.

Type
Features
Information
PS: Political Science & Politics , Volume 47 , Issue 4 , October 2014 , pp. 799 - 805
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abramowitz, Alan. 2011. “Partisan Polarization and the Rise of the Tea Party Movement.” Presented at the Annual Meeting of the America Political Science Association, Seattle, WA.Google Scholar
Blake, Aaron. 2012. “Has the Tea Party Become a GOP Liability?” Washington Post, April 6.Google Scholar
Bullock, Charles, and Hood, H. V. III. 2012. “The Tea Party, Sarah Palin, and the 2010 Election: The Aftermath of the Election of Barack Obama.” Social Science Quarterly 93 (December): 1424–35.Google Scholar
Burghart, Devin. 2012. “Tea Party Endorsed Candidates and Election 2012.” Institute for Research and Education on Human Rights. Available at www.irehr.org/issue-areas/tea-party-nationalism/tea-party-news-and-analysis/item/442-tea-party-endoresed-candidates-and-election-2012 (accessed February 22, 2013).Google Scholar
Campbell, David, and Putnam, Robert. 2011. “Crashing the Tea Party.” New York Times, August 16.Google Scholar
Cannon, David. 1990. Actors, Athletes, and Astronauts: Political Amateurs in the United States Congress. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Friedersdorf, Conor. 2013. “The Decline and Fall of the Tea Party.” The Atlantic, January 6.Google Scholar
Gardner, Amy. 2012. “Inside Dick Armey’s Failed Freedom Works Coup.” Washington Post, December 26.Google Scholar
Gervais, Bryan, and Morris, Irwin. 2012. “Reading the Tea Leaves: Understanding Tea Party Caucus Membership in the US House of Representatives.” PS: Political Science and Politics 45(2): 245–50.Google Scholar
Greenblatt, Alan. 2012. “Is the Party Over for the Tea Party?” Available at www.npr.blogs/itsallpolitics/2012.12/31/168196092/why-tea-party-stands-at-a-crossroads (accessed January 15, 2014).Google Scholar
Gunzburger, Ron. 2012. “Congressional Candidates.” Politics1.com. Available at www.politics1.com/congress.htm (accessed February 24, 2012).Google Scholar
Hofstetter, C. Richard. 1971. “The Amateur Politician: A Problem in Construct Validation.” Midwest Journal of Political Science 15 (February): 31–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacobson, Gary. 2011. “The President, the Tea Party, and Voting Behavior in 2010: Insights from the Cooperative Congressional Election Study.” Presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Seattle, WA Google Scholar
Jonsson, Patrick. 2011. “Why Senators Are Avoiding the Tea Party Caucus.” Christian Science Monitor, January 28.Google Scholar
Christopher, Karpowitz, Quin Monson, J., Patterson, Kelly, and Pope, Jeremy. 2011. “Tea Time in America? The Impact of the Tea Party Movement on the 2010 Midterm Elections.” PS: Political Science and Politics 44(2): 303–9.Google Scholar
Lorber, Janie. 2010. “Republicans Form Caucus for Tea Party in the House.” New York Times, July 21.Google Scholar
Maxwell, Angie, and Wayne Parent, T.. 2012. “The Obama Trigger: Presidential Approval and Tea Party Membership.” Social Science Quarterly 93 (December): 1384–401.Google Scholar
Nimmo, Dan, and Savage, Robert. 1972. “The Amateur Democrat Revisited.” Polity 5 (Winter): 268–76.Google Scholar
Rucker, Philip. 2011. “Senate Tea Party Caucus Holds First Meeting Without Some Who Had Embraced Banner.” Washington Post, January 28.Google Scholar
Travis, Shannon. 2011. “Who Is the Tea Party Caucus in the House?” CNN Political Ticker. Available at politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2011/07/29/who-is-the-tea-party-caucus-in the-house. (accessed February 11, 2013).Google Scholar
Wilson, James. 1962. The Amateur Democrat: Club Politics in Three Cities. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Zernike, Kate. 2011. “Support for Tea Party Falls in Strongholds, Polls Show.” New York Times, November 29.Google Scholar