Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T18:36:46.223Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Still Pluralist After All These Years? Considering Whether Political Science Fosters Tolerance for Dissent or Merely Promotes Leftist Values

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 June 2021

Matthew C. Woessner
Affiliation:
United States Army War College
Robert Maranto
Affiliation:
University of Arkansas

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Ideology in the Classroom
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the American Political Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

American Political Science Association. 2017. “APSA Statement on Violence at Middlebury College on March 2.” www.apsanet.org/Portals/54/goverance/2017/APSA%20Statement%20on%20Violence%20at%20Middlebury%20College%20on%20March%202.pdf?ver=2017-03-09-102506-453.Google Scholar
Ceaser, James W., and Maranto, Robert. 2009. “Why Political Science Is Left but Not Quite PC: Causes of Disunion and Diversity.” In The Politically Correct University, ed. Maranto, Robert, Redding, Richard E., and Hess, Frederick M., 209–24. Washington, DC: American Enterprise Institute.Google Scholar
Crick, Bernard. 1983. In Defense of Politics. New York: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Dryzek, John S. 2006. “Revolutions Without Enemies: Key Transformations in Political Science.” American Political Science Review 100 (4): 487–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Galston, William A. 2018. Anti-Pluralism: The Populist Threat to Liberal Democracy. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Gunnell, John G. 2006. “The Founding of the American Political Science Association: Discipline, Profession, Political Theory, and Politics.” American Political Science Review 100 (4): 481–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
King, Gary, Schlozman, Kay Lehman, and Nie, Norman H.. 2009. The Future of Political Science: 100 Perspectives. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klein, Daniel B., and Stern, Charlotta. 2009. “By the Numbers: The Ideological Profile of Professors.” In The Politically Correct University, ed. Maranto, Robert, Redding, Richard E., and Hess, Frederick M., 1537. Washington, DC: American Enterprise Institute.Google Scholar
Lukianoff, Greg, and Haidt, Jonathan. 2018. The Coddling of the American Mind. New York: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Maranto, Robert. 2015. “It Can Work: The Surprisingly Positive Prospects for Effective Civic Education.” In Civic Education in the Twenty-First Century: A Multidimensional Inquiry, ed. Gooch, Donald and Rogers, Michael, 4360. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
Maranto, Robert, Redding, Richard E., and Hess, Frederick M. (eds.). 2009. “The PC Academy Debate: Questions Not Asked.” The Politically Correct University, 314. Washington, DC: American Enterprise Institute.Google Scholar
Maranto, Robert, and Woessner, Matthew. 2012. “Seeking Relevance: American Political Science and America.” Academic Questions 25 (Fall): 403–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merelman, Richard M. 2003. Pluralism at Yale. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Paul, Darel E. 2018. From Tolerance to Equality. Waco, TX: Baylor University Press.Google Scholar
Pew Research Center. 2017. “Changing Attitudes on Gay Marriage: Public Opinion on Same-Sex Marriage.” www.pewforum.org/fact-sheet/changing-attitudes-on-gay-marriage.Google Scholar
Pew Research Center. 2018. “Public Opinion on Abortion: Views on Abortion, 1995–2018.” www.pewforum.org/fact-sheet/changing-attitudes-on-gay-marriage.Google Scholar
Pitkin, Hannah F. 1967. The Concept of Representation. Berkeley: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rothman, Stanley. 2016. The End of the Experiment. Piscataway, NJ: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar
Rothman, Stanley, Kelly-Woessner, April, and Woessner, Matthew. 2011. The Still Divided Academy: How Competing Visions of Power, Politics, and Diversity Complicate the Mission of Higher Education. New York: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Seidelman, Raymond, and Harpham, Edward J.. 1985. Disenchanted Realists: Political Science and the American Crisis. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Whittington, Keith. 2018. Speak Freely: Why Universities Must Defend Free Speech. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Woessner, Matthew, and Kelly-Woessner, April. 2009a. “Left Pipeline: Why Conservatives Don’t Get Doctorates.” In The Politically Correct University, ed. Maranto, Robert, Redding, Richard E., and Hess, Frederick M., 3859. Washington, DC: American Enterprise Institute.Google Scholar
Woessner, Matthew, and Kelly-Woessner, April. 2009b. “I Think My Professor Is a Democrat: Considering Whether Students Recognize and React to Faculty Politics.” PS: Political Science & Politics 42 (2): 343–52.Google Scholar
Yancey, George. 2012. “Recalibrating Academic Bias.” Academic Questions 25 (2): 267–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Supplementary material: PDF

Woessner and Maranto supplementary material

Appendix A

Download Woessner and Maranto supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 123.7 KB