Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T13:51:37.090Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Smugglers: The Rationality of Political Satire in the 2014 Elections

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 January 2016

Jamie Warner*
Affiliation:
Marshall University

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Features Symposium: The Art of Elections
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Baym, Geoffrey. 2005. “The Daily Show: Discursive Integration and the Reinvention of Political Journalism.” Political Communication 22 (3): 259–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baym, Geoffrey. 2007. “Serious Comedy: The Expanding Boundaries of Political Discourse.”In Laughing Matters: Humor and American Politics in the Media Age, eds. Baumgartner, Jody C. and Morris, Jonathan S.. New York: Routledge, 2137.Google Scholar
Baym, Geoffrey. 2010. From Cronkite to Colbert: The Evolution of Broadcast News. Boulder, CO: Paradigm Publishers.Google Scholar
Baumgartner, Jody C. and Morris, Jonathan S.. 2006. “The Daily Show Effect: Candidate Evaluations, Efficacy, and the American Youth.” American Politics Research 34 (3): 341367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baumgartner, Jody C. and Morris, Jonathan S., eds. 2007. Laughing Matters: Humor and American Politics in the Media Age. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Calhoun, Craig, ed. 1992. Habermas and the Public Sphere. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Caulfield, Rachel Paine. 2008. “The Influence of ‘Infoenterpropagainment’: Exploring the Power of Political Satire as a Distinct Form of Political Humor.” In Laughing Matters: Humor and American Politics in the Media Age, eds. Baumgartner, Jody C. and Morris, Jonathan S.. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Colbert, Stephen. 2014a. “Republicans Are People, Too.” The Colbert Report. October 9. http://thecolbertreport.cc.com/videos/xfjyum/republicans-are-people–too (August 5, 2015).Google Scholar
Colbert, Stephen. 2014b. “Midterms ‘014—Detour to Gridlock—Live Coverage,” The Colbert Report. November 4. http://thecolbertreport.cc.com/videos/1g0aji/midterms–014–-detour-to-gridlock–-live-coverage (August 5, 2015).Google Scholar
Day, Amber. 2011. Satire and Dissent: Interventions in Contemporary Political Debate. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen. [1962] 1989. The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere: And Inquiry into a Category of Bourgeois Society, trans. Thomas Burger with Frederick Lawrence. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen. [1985] 1987. The Philosophical Discourse of Modernity: Twelve Lectures, trans. Lawrence, Frederick G.. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Hart, Roderick P. and Hartelius, Johanna. 2007. “The Political Sins of Jon Stewart.” Critical Studies in Media Communication 24 (3): 263–72.Google Scholar
Jameson, Fredrick. 1991. Postmodernism, or The Cultural Logic of Late Capitalism. Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Jones, Jeffrey P. and Baym, Geoffrey. 2010. “A Dialogue on Satire News and the Crisis of Truth in Postmodern Political Television.” Journal of Communication Inquiry 34 (3): 278–94.Google Scholar
Lyotard, Jean-Francois. 1984. The Postmodern Condition: A Report on Knowledge. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
NAES04. 2004. “Daily Show Viewers Knowledgeable About Presidential Campaign, National Annenberg Election Survey Shows.” Annenberg Center for Public Policy. September 21). http://cdn.annenbergpublicpolicycenter.org/wp-content/uploads/2004_03_late-night-knowledge-2_9-21_pr2.pdf (July 30, 2015).Google Scholar
The Peabody Awards. “The Comedians.” http://www.peabodyawards.com/stories/story/the-comedians (July 30, 2015).Google Scholar
Pew Research Center. 2008. “Journalism, Satire or Just Laughs? "The Daily Show with Jon Stewart," Examined.” Pew Research Center: Journalism and Media. June 8. http://www.journalism.org/2008/05/08/ journalism-satire-or-just-laughs-the-daily-show-with-jon-stewart-examined/ (July 30, 2015).Google Scholar
Stewart, Jon. 2014a. “Democalypse 2014: 2016 Foreplay Edition.” The Daily Show with Jon Stewart. May 7. http://thedailyshow.cc.com/videos/58aovw/democalypse-2014–-2016-foreplay-edition-pt–1. (August 5, 2015).Google Scholar
Stewart, Jon. 2014b. “Democalypse 2014: It’s All About That Base.” The Daily Show with Jon Stewart. September 4. http://thedailyshow.cc.com/videos/exzp4a/democalypse-2014–-it-s-all-about-that-base (August 4, 2015).Google Scholar
Stewart, Jon. 2014c. “Come On Repubicans! Just Go Ahead and Take Over Already.” The Daily Show with Jon Stewart. November 3. http://thedailyshow.cc.com/videos/47novv/democalypse-2014–-come-on–republicans–just-go-ahead–-take-over-already- (August 5, 2015).Google Scholar
Stewart, Jon. 2015. “The Trail to the Path to the Route to the Road to the White House.” The Daily Show with Jon Stewart. February 2. http://thedailyshow.cc.com/videos/adedvb/democalypse-2016–-the-trail-to-the-path-to-the-route-to-the-road-to-the-white-house (August 5, 2015).Google Scholar
Warner, Jamie. 2007. “Political Culture Jamming: The Dissident Humor of The Daily Show with Jon Stewart .” Popular Communication 5:1, 1736.Google Scholar
Warner, Jamie. 2013. “The New Refeudalization of the Public Sphere.” In The Routledge Companion to Advertising and Promotional Culture, eds. McAllister, Matthew P. and West, Emily. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
White, Stephen K. 1991. Political Theory and Postmodernism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Young, Dannagal Goldthwaite. 2011. “ The Daily Show as the New Journalism: In Their Own Words.” In Laughing Matters, eds. Baumgartnr, Jody C. and Morris, Jonathan S.. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar