Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-08T02:54:07.941Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Should the Electoral College be Replaced by the Direct Election of the President? A Debate

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 November 2022

Theodore S. Arlington  and
Saul Branner
Theodore S. Arlington
Affiliation:
University of North Carolina-Charlotte
Saul Branner
Affiliation:
University of North Carolina-Charlotte
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Other
Information
PS: Political Science & Politics , Volume 17 , Issue 2 , Spring 1984 , pp. 237 - 250
Copyright
Copyright © The American Political Science Association 1984

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Selected Bibliography

In Favor of Direct Election

Banzhaf, John F. III, “One Man, 3.312 Votes: A Mathematical Analysis of the Electoral College,” Villanova Law Review (Winter, 1968), 303–46.Google Scholar
Longley, Lawrence D. and Braun, Alan G., The Politics of Electoral College Reform, 2nd ed. (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1975).Google Scholar
Peirce, Neal R., and Longley, Lawrence D., The People's President (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1981).Google Scholar
Yunker, John H. and Longley, Lawrence D., “The Biases of the Electoral College: Who is Really Advantaged?,” in Perspectives on Presidential Selection, ed. Matthews, Donald R. (Washington, D.C.: The Brookings Institution, 1972).Google Scholar
Zeidersteln, Harvey, Direct Election of the President (Lexington, Mass.: Heath-Lexington Books, 1973).Google Scholar
Best, Judith, The Case Against Direct Election of the President: A Defense of the Electoral College (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1975).Google Scholar
Bickel, Alexander M., Reform and Continuity: The Electoral College, The Convention, and The Party System (New York: Harper and Row, 1971).Google Scholar
Diamond, Martin, The Electoral College and The American Idea of Democracy (Washington, D.C.: American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research, 1977).Google Scholar
Power, Max S., “Logic and Legitimacy: On Understanding the Electoral College Controversy,” in Perspectives on Presidential Selections, ed. Matthews, Donald R. (Washington, D.C.: The Brookings Institution, 1972).Google Scholar
Polsby, Nelson W. and Wildavsky, Aaron, Presidential Election: Strategies of American Electoral Politics, Sixth Edition (New York: Charles Scribner's Sons, 1984), 246–256.Google Scholar
Sayre, Wallace S. and Parris, Judith H., Voting for President: The Electoral College and the American Political System (Washington, D.C.: The Brookings Institution, 1970).Google Scholar