Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T08:01:43.941Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Separate Tables: Schools and Sects in Political Science

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2013

Gabriel A. Almond
Gabriel A. Almond*
Affiliation:
Stanford University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

“Miss Cooper: Loneliness is a terrible thing don't you agree?

Anne: Yes, I do agree. A terrible thing ….

Miss Meacham: She's not an ‘alone’ type.

Miss Cooper: Is any type an ‘alone’ type, Miss Meacham … ?”

(From Terence Rattigan's Separate Tables, (1955, 78, 92)

In Separate Tables, the hit of the 1955 New York theatrical season, the Irish playwright, Terence Rattigan, used the metaphor of solitary diners in a second-rate residential hotel in Cornwall to convey the loneliness of the human condition. It may be a bit far fetched to use this metaphor to describe the condition of political science in the 1980s. But in some sense the various schools and sects of political science now sit at separate tables, each with its own conception of proper political science, but each protecting some secret island of vulnerability.

It was not always so. If we recall the state of the profession a quarter of a century ago, let us say in the early 1960s, David Easton's (1953) and David Truman's (1955) scoldings of the profession for its backwardness among the social science disciplines, had been taken to heart by a substantial and productive cadre of young political scientists. In 1961 Robert Dahl wrote his Epitaph for a Monument to a Successful Protest reflecting the sure confidence of a successful movement, whose leaders were rapidly becoming the most visible figures in the profession. Neither Dahl nor Heinz Eulau, whose Behavioral Persuasion appeared in 1963 made exaggerated or exclusive claims for the new political science.

Type
Research Article
Information
PS: Political Science & Politics , Volume 21 , Issue 4 , Fall 1988 , pp. 828 - 842
Copyright
Copyright © The American Political Science Association 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

An earlier version of this paper was delivered as the Distinguished Social Science Lecture at the Northern Illinois University at DeKalb, Illinois, on November 13, 1987.

References

Anderson, Perry. 1976. Considerations on Western Marxism. London: New Left Books.Google Scholar
Axelrod, Robert. 1984. The Evolution of Cooperation. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Bates, Robert. 1988. Macro-Political Economy in the Field of Development. Duke University Program in International Political Economy, Working Paper No. 40 (June).Google Scholar
Bergesen, Albert. 1980. “The Class Structure of the World System.” In Contending Approaches to World System Analysis, ed. Thompson, William R.. Beverly Hills, Calif.: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Black, Duncan. 1958. The Theory of Committees and Elections. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bornschier, Volker, and Hoby, J. P. 1981. “Economic Policy and Multi-National Corporations in Development; The Measurable Impacts in Cross National Perspective.” Social Problems, 28: 363–377.10.2307/800050CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bornschier, Volker, Chase-Dunn, C., and Rubinson, R. 1978. “Cross-national Evidence of Effects of Foreign Aid and Investment on Development.” American Journal of Sociology, 84(3): 207–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buchanan, James, and Wagner, Richard. 1977. Democracy in Deficit. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Buchanan, James. 1978. The Economics of Politics. Lancing, West Sussex: Institute of Economic Affairs.Google Scholar
Cardoso, Fernando, and Faletto, Enzo. 1979. Dependency and Development in Latin America. Berkeley: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Catlin, George E. G. 1927. The Science and Method of Politics. Hamden, Conn.: Anchor Books.Google Scholar
Chase-Dunn, Christopher. 1982. “Commentary.” In World System Analysis: Theory and Methodology, ed. Hopkins, Terence and Wallerstein, Immanuel. Beverly Hills, Calif.: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Crick, Bernard. 1959. The American Science of Politics. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Dahl, Robert A. 1961. “The Behavioral Approach in Political Science; Epitaph for a Monument to a Successful Protest.” American Political Science Review, 55(Dec.): 763–72.Google Scholar
Easton, David. 1953. The Political System. New York: A. A. Knopf.Google Scholar
Eulau, Heinz. 1963. The Behavioral Persuasion in Politics. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
Fagen, Richard. 1978. “A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to the Market: Thoughts on Extending Dependency Ideas.” International Organization, 32(1): 287–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geertz, Clifford. 1972. The Interpretation of Cultures. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Hamilton, Alexander. 1937. The Federalist. Washington, D.C.: National Home Library Foundation.Google Scholar
Held, David. 1980. Introduction to Critical Theory: Horkheimer to Habermas. Berkeley: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hirschman, Albert. 1970. “The Search for Paradigms as a Hindrance to Understanding.” World Politics, 22(3, March): 329–343.10.2307/2009600CrossRefGoogle Scholar
March, James, and Olsen, Johan. 1984. “The New Institutionalism; Organizational Factors in Political Life.” American Political Science Review, 78(3 Sept.): 734–750.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marx, Karl. 1880. Enquiete Ouvriere. In La Revue Socialiste (20 April).Google Scholar
Merriam, Charles E. 1921. “The Present State in the Study of Politics,” American Political Science Review, 15(May): 173–185.Google Scholar
Mitchell, William. 1988. Virginia, Rochester, and Bloomington: Twenty-five Years of Public Choice and Political Science. Public Choice, 56: 101–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
North, Douglass. 1981. Structure and Change in Economic History. New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
Pateman, Carole. 1970. Participation and Democratic Theory. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511720444CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pateman, Carole. 1979. The Problem of Political Obligation. Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar
Pollock, Frederick. 1890. History of the Science of Politics. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Popkin, Samuel. 1979. The Rational Peasant. Berkeley, Calif.: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rattigan, Terence. 1955. Separate Tables. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
Ricci, David. 1984. The Tragedy of Political Science. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Riker, William. 1982. Liberalism Against Populism. San Francisco: Freeman.Google Scholar
Rubinson, Richard, and Chase-Dunn, C. 1979. Cycles, Trends, and New Departures in World System Development. In National Development and World Systems, ed. Meyer, J. W. and Hannan, M. T.. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Seeley, John Robert. 1896. Introduction to Political Science. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Seidelman, Raymond. 1985. Disenchanted Realists. Albany, N.Y.: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Simon, Herbert. 1985. Human Nature in Politics: The Dialogue of Psychology with Political Science. American Political Science Review, 79(2 June): 293–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slater, Philip. 1977. Origin and Significance of the Frankfurt School: A Marxist Perspective. London: Routledge, Kegan, Paul.Google Scholar
Strauss, Leo. 1959. What Is Political Philosophy? Glencoe, Ill.: The Free Press.Google Scholar
Strauss, Leo. 1972. Political Philosophy and the Crisis of Our Time. In The Post Behavioral Era, ed. Graham, George and Carey, George. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, pp. 217–242.Google Scholar
Sylvan, David, Snidal, Duncan et al. , 1983. The Peripheral Economy: Penetration and Economic Distortion, 1970–1975. In Contending Approaches to World System Analysis, ed. Thompson, William. Beverly Hills, Calif.: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Therborn, Goran. 1977. The Frankfurt School in Western Marxism: A Critical Reader. London: New Left Books.Google Scholar
Tocqueville, Alexid de. 1962. Journey to America. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Truman, David. 1955. The Impact of the Revolution in Behavioral Science on Political Science. Brookings Lectures, Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution, pp. 202–231.Google Scholar
Walzer, Michael. 1970. Obligations. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Walter, Michael. 1983. Spheres of Justice. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Weber, Max. 1949. The Methodology of the Social Sciences (translated by Shils, E. A. and Finch, H.A.). Glencoe, Ill.: The Free Press.Google Scholar
Womack, John. 1969. Zapata and the Mexican Revolution. New York: A. A. Knopf.Google Scholar
Wood, Gordon S. 1988. The Fundamentalists and the Constitution. New York Review of Books, (18 Feb.).Google Scholar