No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Scholasticism at Berkeley
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 12 June 2017
Abstract
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Symposium: The “Berkeley School” of Political Theory: A Discussion of its Beginnings, its Development, and the Disagreements over Calling it a “School”
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © American Political Science Association 2017
References
REFERENCES
Gunnell, John G. 1979. Political Theory: Tradition and Interpretation. Boston: Little-Brown.Google Scholar
Gunnell, John G. 1968. Political Philosophy and Time. Middletown, CT: Wesleyan University Press.Google Scholar
Gunnell, John G. 1993. The Descent of Political Theory: The Genealogy of an American Vocation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Jacobson, Norman. 1958. “The Unity of Political Theory: Science, Morals, Politics.” In Approaches to the Study of Politics, ed. Young, Roland, 115–24. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
Jacobson, Norman. 1978. Pride and Solace: The Functions and Limits of Political Theory. Berkeley: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nelson, John. 1986. Tradition, Interpretation, and Science. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Rosenblum, Nancy. 2015. “A Conversation with Hanna Pitkin.”
Annual Review of Political Science
18: 1–10.Google Scholar
Wolin, Sheldon. S. 1969. “Political Theory as a Vocation.”
American Political Science Review
63: 1062–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolin, Sheldon S. and Schaar, John H.. 1970. The Berkeley Rebellion and Beyond: Essays on Politics and Education in the Technological Society. New York: Vintage.Google Scholar