Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-02T18:21:43.873Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Reply to “Reducing Political Bias in Political Science Estimates”

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 January 2017

Daniel Maliniak ,
Ryan Powers  and
Barbara Walter
Daniel Maliniak
Affiliation:
College of William & Mary
Ryan Powers
Affiliation:
University of Wisconsin–Madison
Barbara Walter
Affiliation:
University of California, San Diego
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Zigerell (this issue) cites the findings of his recent reanalysis (Zigerell 2015) of the data in our 2013 study of the gender citation gap in the international relations literature to support his claim that our study showed a “preference for statistically-significant results.” We thank Zigerell for so closely engaging with our work. However, we note that he is focused on how his changes to our sample affect a single model in our original paper, highlight the fact that we reported statistically insignificant results when they arose in our original analyses, and review the findings of other recent re-analyses of our data. Ultimately, while we disagree with Zigerell’s conclusions about our work, we join Zigerell in calling for greater diversity in the discipline.

Type
Controversy: Bias in Political Science Estimates
Information
PS: Political Science & Politics , Volume 50 , Issue 1 , January 2017 , pp. 184 - 185
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Broockman, David, Kalla, Joshua, and Aronow, Peter. “Irregularities in LaCour (2014).” (2015): A36–A38.Google Scholar
Duarte, José L., Crawford, Jarret T., Stern, Charlotta, Haidt, Jonathan, Jussim, Lee, and Tetlock, Phillip E.. 2015. “Political Diversity Will Improve Social Psychological Science.” Behavioral and Brain Sciences 38: e130.Google Scholar
Fogarty, Brian J. 2015. “Comment on Zigerell (2015): Using Poisson Inverse Gaussian Regression on Citation Data.” Research & Politics 2 (4): 2053168015617496.Google Scholar
Gilbert, Daniel T., King, Gary, Pettigrew, Stephen, Wilson, Timothy D.. 2016. “Comment on ‘Estimating the Reproducibility of Psychological Science.’” Science 351.6277: 1037–1037.Google Scholar
LaCour, Michael J. and Green, Donald P.. 2014. “When Contact Changes Minds: An Experiment on Transmission of Support for Gay Equality.” Science 346 (6215): 1366–1369.Google Scholar
Maliniak, Daniel, Powers, Ryan, and Walter, Barbara F.. 2013. “The Gender Citation Gap In International Relations.” International Organization 67 (4): 889–922.Google Scholar
Monogan, James E. 2015. “Research Preregistration in Political Science: The Case, Counterarguments, and a Response to Critiques.” PS: Political Science & Politics 48 (03): 425–429.Google Scholar
Open Science Collaboration. 2015. “Estimating the Reproducibility of Psychological Science.” Science 349 (6251): aac4716.Google Scholar
Roberts, Margaret E., Stewart, Brandon M., and Nielsen, Richard. 2016. “Matching Methods for High-Dimensional Data with Applications to Text.” Working Paper, (http://www.margaretroberts.net/wp-content/uploads/2015/07/textmatching.pdf).Google Scholar
Shields, Jon A. and Dunn Sr, Joshua M.. 2016. Passing on the Right: Conservative Professors in the Progressive University. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Zigerell, L. J. 2015. “Is the Gender Citation Gap in International Relations Driven by Elite Papers?” Research & Politics 2 (2): 2053168015585192.Google Scholar