Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T07:40:59.151Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Public Morality and Religion in the Liberal State

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 November 2022

William A. Galston
William A. Galston*
Affiliation:
Roosevelt Center for American Policy Studies
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

During the past generation, the view has arisen that a liberal polity must remain systematically neutral on the widest possible range of moral and religious questions. During this same period, religious fundamentalism has attained an influence not seen in the United States for more than half a century. It is my thesis that these two developments are intimately related and that, considered together, they have much to teach us about public morality in a liberal society.

Early liberal theorists worked to disentangle civil society from destructive religious quarrels. But they nevertheless assumed that civil society needed morality and that publicly effective morality rested on religion. Juridical liberalism, which focused on the exercise of liberty and the limits of government, presumed a foundation of individual moral restraint. While the civil authority in a liberal society need not directly enforce this moral code in most cases, it should certainly encourage that morality—at the very least, by refraining from utterances and policies that undermine it.

This understanding of the proper relation among politics, morality, and religion dominated the American Founding. It suffused Tocqueville's analysis. In clearly recognizable form, it survived well into the twentieth century. In the past generation, however, this understanding came under attack, and the delicate balance between juridical liberalism and its social preconditions was disrupted. Influential philosophers argued that the essence of liberalism was public neutrality on the widest possible range of moral issues.

Type
Religion and Politics
Information
PS: Political Science & Politics , Volume 19 , Issue 4 , Fall 1986 , pp. 807 - 824
Copyright
Copyright © The American Political Science Association 1986

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Ackerman, Bruce. 1980. Social Justice in the Liberal State. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Bellah, Robert N., Madsen, Richard, Sullivan, William M., Swidler, Ann, and Tipton, Steven M. 1985. Habits of the Heart: Individualism and Commitment in American Life. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Berns, Walter. 1985. The First Amendment and the Future of American Democracy. Chicago: Gateway.Google Scholar
Bowers v. Hardwick, 106 S.Ct. 2841 (1986).Google Scholar
Bryce, James. 1978. The American Commonwealth. In Kurland, Philip B., ed., Religion and the Law: Of Church and State and the Supreme Court. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Dworkin, Ronald. 1978. Liberalism. In Hampshire, Stuart, ed., Public and Private Morality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Galston, William A. 1982. Defending Liberalism. American Political Science Review, 76: 621–629.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howe, Mark DeWolfe. 1965. The Garden and the Wilderness: Religion and Government in American Constitutional History. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Kelly, George. 1982. Faith, Freedom and Disenchantment: Politics and the American Religious Consciousness. Daedalus, Winter: 127–148.Google Scholar
Kurland, Philip B. 1978. Religion and the Law: Of Church and State and the Supreme Court. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Locke, John. 1983. A Letter Concerning Toleration. Tully, James H., ed., Indianapolis: Hackett.Google Scholar
Malbin, Michael J. 1978. Religion and Politics: The Intentions of the Authors of the First Amendment. Washington, D.C.: American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research.Google Scholar
Mansfield, Harvey C. Jr., 1985. The American Election: Entitlements Versus Opportunity. Government and Opposition, 20: 3–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mondale Walter. September 6, 1984. Unpublished speech to the B'ai B'rith International Convention in Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
Neuhaus, Richard John. 1985. What the Fundamentalists Want. Commentary, 79:41–46.Google Scholar
Neuhaus, Richard John. 1984. The Naked Public Square: Religion and Democracy in America. Grand Rapids, MI: William B. Eerdmans.Google Scholar
Martin, David. 1982. Revised Dogma and New Cult. Daedalus, Winter: 53–71.Google Scholar
Rawls, John. 1971. A Theory of Justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reichley, A. James. 1985. Religion in American Public Life. Washington, D.C.: The Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
Shklar, Judith. 1985. Ordinary Vices. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Smith, Rogers M. 1985. Liberalism and American Constitutional Law. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Smith, Rogers M. 1982. The Constitution and Autonomy. Texas Law Review, 60: 175–205.Google Scholar
Tarcov, Nathan. 1984. Locke's Education for Liberty. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Tocqueville, Alexis de. 1969. Democracy in America. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.Google Scholar
Wallace v. Jaffree, 105 S.Ct. 2479 (1985).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, James Q. 1985. The Rediscovery of Character: Private Virtue and Public Policy. The Public Interest, 81:3–16.Google Scholar