Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T09:19:34.799Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Predatory Publishing, Open Access, and the Costs to Academia

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 April 2016

Timothy S. Rich
Timothy S. Rich*
Affiliation:
Western Kentucky University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

As publishing demands increase, so does the availability of open access predatory publishing options masquerading as reputable peer-review outlets. This article cautions against the broader consequences of predatory publishing and suggests means to control their influence.

Type
The Profession
Information
PS: Political Science & Politics , Volume 49 , Issue 2 , April 2016 , pp. 265 - 267
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Antelman, Kristin. 2004. “Do Open-Access Articles Have a Greater Research Impact?” College & Research Libraries 65 (5): 372–82.Google Scholar
Beall, Jeffrey. 2015a. “Global Science Research Journals: A Dangerous Publisher, Keep Clear.” Scholarly Open Access Blog. June 9. Available at http://scholarlyoa.com/2015/06/09/global-science-research-journals-a-dangerous-publisher-keep-clear/#more-5513.Google Scholar
Beall, Jeffrey. 2015b. “Did a Romanian Researcher Successfully Game Google Scholar to Raise His Citation Count?” Scholarly Open Access Blog. January 20. Available at http://scholarlyoa.com/2015/01/20/did-a-romanian-researcher-successfully-game-google-scholar-to-raise-his-citation-count/#more-4813.Google Scholar
Beall, Jeffrey. 2015c. “OMICS Group Now Charging for Article Withdrawals.” Scholarly Open Access Blog. May 28. Available at http://scholarlyoa.com/2015/05/28/omics-group-now-charging-for-article-withdrawals/#more-5425.Google Scholar
Berger, Monica, and Cirasella, Jill. 2015. “Beyond Beall’s List: Better Understanding Predatory Publishers.” College & Research Libraries News 76 (3): 132–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berrett, Dan. 2012. “Open-Book, Closed-Book, or ‘Cheat Sheet’? Researchers Test the Merits of Different Exam Types.” Chronicle of Higher Education. December 12. Available at http://chronicle.com/article/Open-Book-Closed-Book-or/136249.Google Scholar
Bohannon, John. 2013. “Who’s Afraid of Peer Review?” Science 342 (6154): 60–5. Available at www.sciencemag.org/content/342/6154/60.full.Google Scholar
Butler, Declan. 2013. “Sham Journals Scam Authors.” Nature. March 27. Available at www.nature.com/news/sham-journals-scam-authors-1.12681.Google Scholar
Byers, Dylan. 2012. “CNN Retracts ‘Voting and Hormones’ Story.” Politico. October 24. Available at www.politico.com/blogs/media/2012/10/cnn-retracts-voting-and-hormones-story-147146.html.Google Scholar
Calin-Jageman, Robert, and Beall, Jeffrey. 2013. “Should Journalists Cite Material from Predatory Journals?” Scholarly Open Access Blog. January 8. Available at http://scholarlyoa.com/2013/01/08/should-journalists-cite-material-from-predatory-journals/#more-1129.Google Scholar
Craig, Iain D., Plume, Andrew M., McVeigh, Marie E., Pringle, James, and Amin, Mayur. 2007. “Do Open-Access Articles Have Greater Citation Impact? A Critical Review of the Literature.” Journal of Informatics 1 (3): 239–48.Google Scholar
Crawford, Walt. 2014. “Journals, ‘Journals,’ and Wannabes: Investigating the List.” Cites & Insights 14 (7): 1–24.Google Scholar
Freely, I. P., Clothesoff, Oliver, Strap, Jacques, Jazz, Hugh, and Huginkiss, Amanda. 2014. “Roberts No Longer Considered Harmful.” Journal of Computer Science and Information Technology 2 (2): 185–94. Available at http://jcsitnet.com/journals/jcsit/Vol_2_No_2_June_2014/12.pdf.Google Scholar
Gharib, Afshin, Phillips, William, and Mathew, Noelle. 2012. “Cheat Sheet or Open-Book? A Comparison of the Effects of Exam Types on Performance, Retention, and Anxiety.” Psychology Research 2 (8): 469–78. Available at www.davidpublishing.com/davidpublishing/Upfile/10/15/2012/2012101583885209.pdf.Google Scholar
Herley, Cormac. 2012. “Why Do Nigerian Scammers Say They Are from Nigeria?” Unpublished paper. Available at http://research.microsoft.com/pubs/167719/whyfromnigeria.pdf.Google Scholar
Hoenig, Michael. 2014. “‘Unreliable’ Articles: More on Peer Review’s Frailties.” New York Law Journal. June 9. Available at www.herzfeld-rubin.com/publ_complexlitigation_20140609.htm.Google Scholar
Kaiser, Hinrich, Crother, Brian I., Kelly, Christopher M. R., Luiselli, Luca, O’Shea, Mark, Ota, Hidetoshi, Passos, Paulo, Schleip, Wulf D., and Wuster, Wolfgang. 2013. “Best Practices: In the 21st Century, Taxonomic Decisions in Herpetology Are Acceptable Only When Supported by a Body of Evidence and Published via Peer-Review.” Herpetological Review 44 (1): 8–23. Available at www.southeastern.edu/acad_research/depts/biol/faculty/pdf/kaiser_et_al2013.pdf.Google Scholar
Kolata, Gina. 2013. “Scientific Articles Accepted (Personal Checks, Too).” New York Times, April 8. Available at www.nytimes.com/2013/04/08/health/for-scientists-an-exploding-world-of-pseudo-academia.html?_r=1.Google Scholar
LaCour, Michael J., and Green, Donald P.. 2014. “When Contact Changes Minds: An Experiment on Transmission of Support for Gay Equality.” Science 346 (6215): 1366–9.Google Scholar
Lawrence, Steve. 2001. “Free Online Availability Substantially Increases a Paper’s Impact.” Nature 411: 521.Google Scholar
Mazieres, David, and Kohler. ND, Eddie. “Get Me Off Your Fucking Mailing List.” Available at www.scs.stanford.edu/∼dm/home/papers/remove.pdf.Google Scholar
Narang, Sanjeev. 2014. “Ulcerative Colitis.” International Journal of Medical Science Research and Practice 1 (1): 27.Google Scholar
Perry, Susan. 2015. “‘Plagiarism, Fraud, and Predatory Publishing’ Are Polluting Science, Says Bioethicist Arthur Caplan.” Minneapolis Post. April 7. Available at www.minnpost.com/second-opinion/2015/04/plagiarism-fraud-and-predatory-publishing-are-polluting-science-says-bioethic.Google Scholar
Regnerus, Mark. 2012. “How Different Are the Adult Children of Parents Who Have Same-Sex Relationships? Findings from the New Family Structures Study.” Social Science Research 41: 752–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
The Scientist . 2012. “Whither Science Publishing?” August 1. Available at www.the-scientist.com/?articles.view/articleNo/32378/title/Whither-Science-Publishing.Google Scholar
Spears, Tom. 2014a. “Blinded by Scientific Gobbledygook.” Ottawa Citizen, April 21. Available at http://ottawacitizen.com/news/local-news/blinded-by-scientific-gobbledygook.Google Scholar
Spears, Tom. 2014b. “Respected Medical Journal Turns to Dark Side.” Ottawa Citizen, August 20. Available at http://ottawacitizen.com/technology/science/respected-medical-journal-turns-to-dark-side.Google Scholar
Utomo, Yunanto Wiji. 2012. “Agnes dan Inul Dicatut di Makalah Jurnal Internasional.” KOMPAS. August 29. Available at http://sains.kompas.com/read/2012/08/29/13392470/Agnes.dan.Inul.Dicatut.di.Makalah.Jurnal.Internasional.Google Scholar
Van Noorden, Richard. 2013. “Open Access: The True Cost of Science Publishing.” Nature. March 27. Available at www.nature.com/news/open-access-the-true-cost-of-science-publishing-1.12676.Google Scholar
Xia, Jingfeng, Harmon, Jennifer L., Connolly, Kevin G., Donnelly, Ryan M., Anderson, Mary R., and Howard, Heather A.. 2015. “Who Publishes in ‘Predatory’ Journals?” Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology 66 (7): 1406–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar